Multiagent argumentation for cooperative planning in DeLP-POP

10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems 2011, AAMAS 2011

Volumn 2, Issue , 2011, Pages 913-920

  Pardo, Pere ^a   Pajares, Sergio ^b   Onaindia, Eva ^b   Godo, Lluís ^a   Dellunde, Pilar ^c  

^a ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE IIIA CSIC   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Cooperation; Multiagent Planning

Indexed keywords

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS; LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

ARGUMENTATION; CO-OPERATIVE PLANNING; COOPERATION; COOPERATIVE SCENARIOS; DEFEASIBLE LOGIC PROGRAMMING; MULTI-AGENT PLANNING; PARTIAL ORDER PLANNING; SEARCH ALGORITHMS;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84899410607     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. L. Amgoud. A formal framework for handling conflicting desires. In Proc. of 7th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning with Uncertainty, ECSQARU 2003, LNAI 2711, Springer, pp. 552-563, 2003.
2. A. Belesiotis, M. Rovatsos, and I. Rahwan. Agreeing on plans through iterated disputes. In Proc. of 9th Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, AAMAS 2010, pp. 765-772, 2010.
3. P. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial intelligence, 77(2):321-357, 1995.
4. A. García and G. Simari. Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 4:95-138, 2004.
5. D. García, A. García, and G. Simari. Defeasible reasoning and partial order planning. In Proc. of the 5th International Conference on Foundations of information and knowledge systems, FoIKS 2008, LNCS 4932, pp. 311-328, 2008.
6. A. Gerevini and L. Schubert. Accelerating partial-order planners: Some techniques for effective search control and pruning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 5:95-137, 1996.
7. J. Hulstijn and L. van der Torre. Combining goal generation and planning in an argumentation framework. In Proc. of NMR 2004 Workshop on Argument, Dialogue and Decision, J. P. Delgrande and T. Schaub (Eds.), pp. 212-218, 2004.
8. J. Pearl. Heuristics: Intelligent Search Strategies for Computer Problem Solving. Addison-Wesley, 1984.
9. J. Penberthy and D. Weld. Ucpop: A sound, complete, partial order planner for adl. In Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'92), pp. 103-114, 1992.
10. I. Rahwan and L. Amgoud. An argumentation-based approach for practical reasoning. In Proc. of 5th Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, AAMAS 2006, pp. 347-354, 2006.
11. G. Simari and R. Loui. A mathematical treatment of defeasible reasoning and its implementation. Artificial intelligence, 53:125-157, 1992.
12. Y. Tang, T. Norman, and S. Parsons. A model for integrating dialogue and the execution of joint plans. In Proc. of ArgMAS 2009, P. McBurney et al. (Eds.), LNAI 6057, pp. 60-78, 2010.
13. M. Thimm. Realizing argumentation in multi-agent systems using defeasible logic programming. In Proc. of ArgMAS 2009, P. McBurney et al. (Eds.), LNAI 6057, pp. 175-194, 2010