Agreeing on plans through iterated disputes

Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS

Volumn 2, Issue , 2010, Pages 765-772

  Belesiotis, Alexandros ^a   Rovatsos, Michael ^a   Rahwan, Iyad ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Communication protocols; Distributed problem solving; Planning

Indexed keywords

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; PLANNING;

ARGUMENTATION; DIALOGUE PROTOCOLS; DISTRIBUTED PROBLEM SOLVING; SITUATION CALCULUS; SPECIFIC PROBLEMS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 84899457206     PISSN: 15488403     EISSN: 15582914     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. K. Atkinson and T. Bench-Capon. Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence, 171(10-15):855-874, 2007.
2. A. Belesiotis, M. Rovatsos, and I. Rahwan. A generative dialogue system for arguing about plans in situation calculus. In Proceedings of ArgMAS-09, May 2009.
3. P. M. Dung. On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence, 77(2):321-357. 1995.
4. P. E. Dunne and T. Bench-Capon. Two party immediate response disputes: properties and efficiency. Artificial Intelligence, 149(2):221-250, 2003.
5. A. Finzi, F. Pirri, and R. Reiter. Open world planning in the situation calculus. In Proceedings of AAAI-2000, pages 754-760. AAAI Press, 2000.
6. D. Garcia, A. Garcia, and G. Simari. Planning and defeasible reasoning. In Proceedings of AAMAS-07, 2007.
7. A. Kakas, R. Miller, and F. Toni. An argumentation framework for reasoning about actions and changes. Lecture notes in computer science, pages 78-91, 1999.
8. J. McCarthy and P. J. Hayes. Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. Machine Intelligence, 4, 1969.
9. D. Nau, M. Ghallab, and P. Traverso. Automated Planning: Theory & Practice. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA, 2004.
10. I. Rahwan and L. Amgoud. An argumentation based approach for practical reasoning. In Proceedings of AAMAS-06, pages 347-354, 2006.
11. R. Reiter. Knowledge in Action: Logical Foundations for Specifying and Implementing Dynamical Systems. MIT Press, 2001.
12. G. Roger, M. Helmert, and B. Nebel. On the relative expressiveness of ADL and Golog: The last piece in the puzzle. In Proceedings of KR-08, 2008.
13. D. Smith and D. Weld. Conformant graphplan. In Proceedings of AAAI-98, pages 889-896, 1998.
14. Y. Tang and S. Parsons. Argumentation-based dialogues for deliberation. In Proceedings of AAMAS-05, pages 552-559, 2005.
15. Q. Vo and N. Foo. Reasoning about action: An argumentation-theoretic approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 24:465-518, 2005.