Realizing argumentation in multi-agent systems using Defeasible Logic Programming

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6057 LNAI, Issue , 2010, Pages 175-194

  Thimm, Matthias ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL ISSUES; DEFEASIBLE LOGIC PROGRAMMING; DISTRIBUTED APPROACHES; INDIVIDUAL AGENT; INTUITIVE MODELING; MULTIAGENT ARCHITECTURE; RATIONAL REPRESENTATION; THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK;

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 78650499774     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12805-9_11     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. de Almeida, I.C., Alferes, J.J.: An argumentation-based negotiation for distributed extended logic programs. In: Proceedings of CLIMA VII, pp. 191-210 (2006).
2. Alsinet, T., Chesñevar, C.I., Godo, L., Simari, G.R.: A logic programming framework for possibilistic argumentation: Formalization and logical properties. Fuzzy Sets and Systems (2008).
3. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: A dialogue game protocol for multiagent argument over proposals for action. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11(2), 153-171 (2005). (Pubitemid 41240135)
4. Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Persuasion in practical argument using value based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429-448 (2003).
5. Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Dunne, P.E.: Argumentation in artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence 171, 619-641 (2007).
6. Biskup, J., Kern-Isberner, G., Thimm, M.: Towards enforcement of confidentiality in agent interactions. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Non- Monotonic Reasoning, pp. 104-112 (2008).
7. Black, E.: A Generative Framework for Argumentation-Based Inquiry Dialogues. Ph.D. thesis, University College London (2007).
8. Black, E., Hunter, A.: An inquiry dialogue system. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 19(2), 173-209 (2009).
9. Dung, P.M.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77(2), 321-358 (1995).
10. García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible logic programming: An argumentative approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4(1-2), 95-138 (2004).
11. Karunatillake, N.C., Jennings, N.R., Rahwan, I., Norman, T.J.: Argument-based negotiation in a social context. In: Proceedings of the 4th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, pp. 1331-1332. ACM, New York (2005).
12. Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I.: Argumentation in multi-agent systems: Context and recent developments. In: Third International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 1-16 (2007).
13. Perrussel, L., Doutre, S., Thévenin, J.M., McBurney, P.: A persuasion dialog for gaining access to information. In: Rahwan, I., Parsons, S., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4946, pp. 63-79. Springer, Heidelberg (2008).
14. Prakken, H.: Dialectical proof theory for defeasible argumentation with defeasible priorities (preliminary report). In: Model Age Workshop, pp. 202-215 (1997).
15. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logical systems for defeasible argumentation. In: Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 4, pp. 219-318. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002).
16. Roth, B., Riveret, R., Rotolo, A., Governatori, G.: Strategic Argumentation: A Game Theoretical Investigation. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 81-90. ACM Press, New York (2007).
17. Stolzenburg, F., García, A., Chesnevar, C.I., Simari, G.: Computing generalized specificity. Journal of Non-Classical Logics 13(1), 87-113 (2003).
18. Thimm, M.: Verteilte logikbasierte Argumentation: Konzeption, Implementierung und Anwendung im Rechtswesen. VDM Verlag Dr. Müller (2008).
19. Thimm, M., Garcia, A.J., Kern-Isberner, G., Simari, G.R.: Using collaborations for distributed argumentation with defeasible logic programming. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, pp. 179-188 (2008).
20. Thimm, M., Kern-Isberner, G.: A distributed argumentation framework using defeasible logic programming. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp. 381-392. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008).
21. Thimm, M., Kern-Isberner, G.: On the relationship of defeasible argumentation and answer set programming. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, pp. 393-404. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2008).