X-ray second harmonic generation

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 112, Issue 16, 2014, Pages

  Shwartz, S ^a,b   Fuchs, M ^c,d   Hastings, J B ^c   Inubushi, Y ^e   Ishikawa, T ^e   Katayama, T ^f   Reis, D A ^c,g   Sato, T ^e   Tono, K ^f   Yabashi, M ^e   Yudovich, S ^a   Harris, S E ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SLAC NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^e RIKEN Harima Institute Research   (Japan)

^f JAPAN SYNCHROTRON RADIATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^g STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FREE ELECTRON LASERS; NONLINEAR OPTICS; X RAYS;

BACKGROUND RADIATION; EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE; HARD X RAY; PHASE-MATCHING CONDITION; PUMP INTENSITIES; PUMP PULSE ENERGY; SECOND HARMONICS;

HARMONIC GENERATION;

EID: 84899104246     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.163901     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. I. Freund and B.F. Levine, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 854 (1969). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.23.854
2. P.M. Eisenberger and S.L. McCall, Phys. Rev. Lett. 26, 684 (1971). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.684
3. B.W. Adams, Nonlinear Optics, Quantum Optics, and Ultrafast Phenomena with X-Rays (Kluwer Academic, Norwell, MA, 2008).
4. B. Adams, Y. Nishino, D.V. Novikov, G. Materlik, and D.M. Mills, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 467-468, 1019 (2001). NIMAER 0168-9002 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00572-1
5. B. Adams, P. Fernandez, W.-K. Lee, G. Materlik, D.M. Mills, and D.V. Novikov, J. Synchrotron Radiat. 7, 81 (2000). JSYRES 0909-0495 10.1107/S0909049599015113
6. K. Tamasaku and T. Ishikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 244801 (2007). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.244801
7. K. Tamasaku, K. Sawada, and T. Ishikawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 254801 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.254801
8. K. Tamasaku, K. Sawada, E. Nishibori, and T. Ishikawa, Nat. Phys. 7, 705 (2011). NPAHAX 1745-2473 10.1038/nphys2044
9. S. Shwartz, R.N. Coffee, J.M. Feldkamp, Y. Feng, J.B. Hastings, G.Y. Yin, and S.E. Harris, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 013602 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.013602
10. L. Young, Nature (London) 466, 56 (2010). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature09177
11. L. Fang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 083005 (2010). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.083005
12. B. Rudek, Nat. Photonics, 6, 858 (2012). NPAHBY 1749-4885 10.1038/nphoton.2012.261
13. P. Salen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 153003 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.153003
14. S. Schorb, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 233401 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.233401
15. T. Gorkhover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 245005 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.245005
16. C. Bostedt, J. Phys. B 46 164003 (2013). JPAPEH 0953-4075 10.1088/0953-4075/46/16/164003
17. M.M. Seibert, Nature (London) 470, 78 (2011). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature09748
18. H.N. Chapman, Nature (London) 470, 73 (2011). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature09750
19. G. Doumy, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 083002 (2011). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.083002
20. T.E. Glover, Nature (London) 488, 603 (2012). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/nature11340
21. A. Nazarkin, S. Podorov, I. Uschmann, E. Forster, and R. Sauerbrey, Phys. Rev. A 67, 041804(R) (2003). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.67.041804
22. T. Ishikawa, Nat. Photonics 6, 540 (2012). NPAHBY 1749-4885 10.1038/nphoton.2012.141
23. G. Geloni, E. Saldin, E. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, Opt. Commun. 271, 207 (2007). OPCOB8 0030-4018 10.1016/j.optcom.2006.10.019
24. H.P. Freund, S.G. Biedron, and S.V. Milton, IEEE J. Quantum Electron. 36, 275 (2000). IEJQA7 0018-9197 10.1109/3.825873
25. D. Ratner, Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams 14, 060701 (2011). PRABFM 1098-4402 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.14.060701
26. H. Yumoto, Nat. Photonics 7, 43 (2013). NPAHBY 1749-4885 10.1038/nphoton.2012.306
27. From the thickness of the Al postfilter and the tabulated absorption coefficients [29], we estimate that the transmission of the fundamental wavelength is reduced by a factor of about (Equation presented) while the SHG beam is reduced by a factor of about 7.
28. Note that a fraction of the 3rd harmonic of the FEL is selected by the Si monochromator but is partially rejected by the focusing mirrors. We estimate that the 3rd harmonic contamination before the diamond crystal is smaller than (Equation presented). The (330) reflection of the diamond crystal is strictly forbidden in the bulk, but has a residual intensity due to surface truncation effects. However, we find the contribution from the 3rd harmonic counts to be insignificant.
29. B.L. Henke, E.M. Gullikson, and J.C. Davis, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 54, 181 (1993). ADNDAT 0092-640X 10.1006/adnd.1993.1013
30. R.W. Boyd, Nonlinear Optics (Elsevier Inc., Burlington, MA, 2008).
31. Y. Inubushi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 144801 (2012). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.144801