Short-term results of a randomized study between laparoscopic and open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 466-476

  Fujii, Shoichi ^a,b   Ishibe, Atsushi ^a   Ota, Mitsuyoshi ^a   Yamagishi, Shigeru ^a   Watanabe, Kazuteru ^c   Watanabe, Jun ^c   Kanazawa, Amane ^a   Ichikawa, Yasushi ^c   Oba, Mari ^d   Morita, Satoshi ^d   Hashiguchi, Yojiro ^b   Kunisaki, Chikara ^a   Endo, Itaru ^c  

^a YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TEIKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d YOKOHAMA CITY UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Japan)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Elderly patient; Laparoscopic surgery; Randomized control study

Indexed keywords

AGED; AGING; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CANCER PATIENT; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ILEUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PERITONEUM METASTASIS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; VERY ELDERLY; AGE; CANCER STAGING; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FOLLOW UP; INCIDENCE; JAPAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; JAPAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LAPAROTOMY; MALE; NEOPLASM STAGING; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84899103351     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-3223-x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Green BL, Marshall HC, Collinson F, Quirke P, Guillou P, Jayne DG, Brown JM (2013) Long-term follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of conventional versus laparoscopically assisted resection in colorectal cancer. Br J Surg 100:75-82
2. Lacy AM, Delgado S, Castells A, Prins HA, Arroyo V, Ibarzabal A, Pique JM (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1-7
3. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, Anvari M, Stryker SJ, Beart RW Jr, Hellinger M, Flanagan R Jr, Peters W, Nelson H, Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2007) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg 246:655-662 (Pubitemid 47480618)
4. Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group, Buunen M, Veldkamp R, Hop WC, Kuhry E, Jeekel J, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy A, Bonjer HJ (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44-52
5. Ng Simon S, Leung KL, Lee JF, Yiu RY, Li JC, Hon SS (2009) Long-term morbidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer: ten-year results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 52:558-566
6. Inomata M, Yasuda K, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2009) Clinical evidences of laparoscopic versus open surgery for colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 39:471-477
7. Morris EJ, Jordan C, Thomas JD, Cooper M, Brown JM, Thorpe H, Cameron D, Forman D, Jayne D, Quirke P, CLASICC trialists (2011) Comparison of treatment and outcome information between a clinical trial and the National Cancer Data Repository. Br J Surg 98:299-307
8. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med 350:2050-2059
9. Kitano S, Inomata M, Sato A, Yoshimura K, Moriya Y (2005) Randomized controlled trial to evaluate laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG 0404. Jpn J Clin Oncol 35:475-477 (Pubitemid 41309201)
10. Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A, Zuliani W, Di Carlo V (2008) Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum 51:296-300
11. Tomimaru Y, Ide Y, Murata K (2011) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in elderly patients. Asian J Endosc Surg 4:1-6
12. Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, Duepree HJ, Brady KM, Delaney CP (2003) Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg 138:252-256 (Pubitemid 36292657)
13. Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070-2075 (Pubitemid 43035113)
14. Tei M, Ikeda M, Haraguchi N, Takemasa I, Mizushima T, Ishii H, Yamamoto H, Sekimoto M, Doki Y, Mori M (2009) Postoperative complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: comparison of open and laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 19:488-492
15. Tuech JJ, Pessaux P, Rouge C, Regenet N, Bergamaschi R, Arnaud JP (2000) Laparoscopic vs open colectomy for sigmoid diverticulitis: a prospective comparative study in the elderly. Surg Endosc 14:1031-1033
16. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326-332 (Pubitemid 30158568)
17. Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW (1999) Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg 86:938-941 (Pubitemid 29333021)
18. Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923-929 (Pubitemid 36676903)
19. Lian L, Kalady M, Geisler D, Kiran RP (2010) Laparoscopic colectomy is safe and leads to a significantly shorter hospital stay for octogenarians. Surg Endosc 24:2039-2043
20. Law WL, Chu KW, Tung PH (2002) Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg 195:768-773 (Pubitemid 35470885)
21. She WH, Poon JT, Fan JK, Lo OS, Law WL (2013) Outcome of laparoscopic colectomy for cancer in elderly patients. Surg Endosc 27:308-312
22. Robinson CN, Balentine CJ, Marshall CL, Wilks JA, Anaya D, Artinyan A, Berger DH, Albo D (2011) Minimally invasive surgery improves short-term outcomes in elderly colorectal cancer patients. J Surg Res 166:182-188
23. Grailey K, Markar SR, Karthikesalingam A, Aboud R, Ziprin P, Faiz O (2013) Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection in the elderly population. Surg Endosc 27:19-30
24. Mori T, Kimura T, Kitajima M (2010) Skill accreditation system for laparoscopic gastroenterologic surgeons in Japan. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 19:18-23
25. Colorectal Cancer Society (2006) The 7th edition of the Japanese general rules for clinical and pathological studies on cancer of the colon, rectum and anus. Kanahara Publications, Tokyo
26. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (1999) Common toxicity criteria, version 2.0. http://ctep.info.nih.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic- applications/docs/ctcv20-4-30-992.pdf
27. International Union Against Cancer (2010) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edn. Wiley-Liss, New York
28. National Cancer Institute. Common terminology criteria for adverse events, version 4.0. http://www.eortc.be/services/doc/ctc/CTCAE-4.03-2010-06-14- QuickReference-5x7.pdf#search= 'Common+Terminology+Criteria+for+Adverse+Events+version+4.0.3
29. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205-213 (Pubitemid 38963009)
30. Fukuhara S, Bito S, Green J, Hsiao A, Kurokawa K (1998) Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1037-1044 (Pubitemid 28527159)
31. Japan Cabinet Office. [White paper on aging society]. http://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/w-2012/zenbun/24pdf-index.htm
32. Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery (2012) Survey of endoscopic surgery in Japan. J Jpn Soc Endosc Surg 17:571-679
33. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H, Walker J, Jayne DG, Smith AMH, Heath RM, Brown JM, MRC CLASICC trial group (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial); multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718-1726 (Pubitemid 40719107)
34. Miyajima N, Fukunaga M, Hasegawa H, Tanaka J, Okuda J, Watanabe M (2009) Results of a multicenter study of 1,057 cases of rectal cancer treated by laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:113-118
35. da Luz MoreiraA, Kiran RP, Kirat HT, Remzi FH, Geisler DP, Church JM, Garofalo T, Fazio VW (2010) Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classifications 3 and 4: the minimally invasive approach is associated with significantly quicker recovery and reduced costs. Surg Endosc 24:1280-1286
36. Veldkamp R, Kuhry E, Hop WC, Jeekel J, Kazemier G, Bonjer HJ, Haglind E, Påhlman L, Cuesta MA, Msika S, Morino M, Lacy AM, COlon cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group (COLOR) (2005) Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 6:477-484 (Pubitemid 40903628)
37. Ito M, Sugito M, Kobayashi A, Nishizawa Y, Tsunoda Y, Saito N (2008) Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 23:703-707 (Pubitemid 351663523)