Postoperative complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer: Comparison of open and laparoscopic surgical procedures

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 488-492

  Tei, Mitsuyoshi ^a   Ikeda, Masataka ^a   Haraguchi, Naotsugu ^a   Takemasa, Ichiro ^a   Mizushima, Tsunekazu ^a   Ishii, Hideshi ^a   Yamamoto, Hirofumi ^a   Sekimoto, Mitsugu ^a   Doki, Yuichiro ^a   Mori, Masaki ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Colorectal cancer; Complications; Elderly; Laparoscopic surgery

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER MORTALITY; CATHETER INFECTION; COLORECTAL CANCER; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DELIRIUM; ELDERLY CARE; FEMALE; HEART DISEASE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE OBSTRUCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LUNG DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORBIDITY; NUTRITIONAL STATUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND INFECTION;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLECTOMY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; JAPAN; LAPAROSCOPY; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 74949138589     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bd9562     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al. Laparoscopic Versus open colorectal surgery. A randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg. 2002;236:759-767. (Pubitemid 35403231)
2. Abraham NS, Young JM, Solomon MJ. Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2004;91:1111-1124.
3. Leung KL, Kwok SP, Lam SC, et al. Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: prospective randomised trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1187-1192.
4. The COST Group. A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;350: 2050-2059.
5. Lacy AM, García-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al. Laparoscopic- assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet. 2002;359:2224-2229.
6. Bo F, Min-Hua Z, Zhi-Hai M. Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2006;18:191-195.
7. Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, et al. Laparoscopic versus open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:2070-2075.
8. Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, et al. Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:923-929.
9. Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2003;13:95-100.
10. Senagore AJ, Madbouly KM, Fazio VW, et al. Advantages of laparoscopic colectomy in older patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138: 252-256.
11. Law WL, Chu KW, Ming Tung PH. Laparoscopic colorectal resection: a safe option for elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:768-773.
12. Delgado S, Lacy AM, García Valdecasas JC, et al. Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc. 2000;14:22-26.
13. Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, et al. Safety and advantages of laparoscopic versus open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2000;43: 326-332.
14. Stewart BT, Stitz RW, Lumley JW. Laparoscopically assisted colorectal surgery in the elderly. Br J Surg. 1999;86:938-941.
15. Copeland GP, Jones D, Walters M. POSSUM: a scoring system for surgical audit. Br J Surg. 1991;78:356-360.
16. Onodera T, Goseki N, Kosaki G. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi. 1984;85:1001-1005.
17. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Stasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111:518-526.
18. Person B, Cera SM, Sands DR, et al. Do elderly patients benefit from laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Surg Endosc. 2007;22:401-405.
19. Noblett SE, Horgan AF. A prospective case-matched comparison of clinical and financial outcomes of open versus laparoscopic colorectal resection. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:404-408.
20. Brosens RP, Oomen JL, Glas AS, et al. POSSUM predicts decreased overall survival in curative resection for colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:825-832.
21. Constantinides VA, Tekkis PP, Senapati A. Comparison of POSSUM scoring systems and the surgical risk scale in patients undergoing surgery for complicated diverticular disease. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:1322-1331.
22. Buzby GP, Mullen JL, Matthews DC, et al. Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery. Am J Surg. 1980;139: 160-167.
23. Ganai S, Lee KF, Merrill A, et al. Adverse outcomes of geriatric patients undergoing abdominal surgery who are at high risk for delirium. Arch Surg. 2007;142:1072-1078.
24. Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hügel O, et al. Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcomes differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:328-332.
25. Frasson M, Braga M, Vignali A, et al. Benefits of laparoscopic colorectal resection are more pronounced in elderly patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:296-300.