Supervisory-level interruption recovery in time-critical control tasks

Applied Ergonomics

Volumn 45, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1148-1156

  Sasangohar, Farzan ^a   Scott, Stacey D ^a   Cummings, M L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Interruption; Supervisory control; Unmanned vehicles

Indexed keywords

AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL; RECOVERY; UNMANNED VEHICLES;

EXPERIMENTAL PLATFORM; HUMAN SUPERVISORS; INTERFACE DESIGNS; INTERRUPTION; PERIPHERAL DISPLAYS; SUPERVISORY CONTROL; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORK ENVIRONMENTS;

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

ACCURACY; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DECISION MAKING; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR VEHICLE; SUPERVISORY LEVEL INTERRUPTION RECOVERY; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME CRITICAL CONTROL TASK; UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE; WORK ENVIRONMENT; WORKPLACE; ADOLESCENT; ATTENTION; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOLOGY; SOLDIER; TIME; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MILITARY PERSONNEL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84899094040     PISSN: 00036870     EISSN: 18729126     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2014.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Altmann E.M., Trafton J.G. Memory for goals: an activation-based model. Cog. Sci. 2002, 26:39-83.
2. Altmann E.M., Trafton J.G. Task interruption: resumption lag and the role of cues. Proc. of CogSci 2004: 26th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society 2004, 43-48.
3. Bailey B.P., Konstan J.A. On the need for attention-aware systems: measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Comp. Hum. Behav. 2006, 22(4):685-708.
4. Boehm-Davis D.A., Remington R. Reducing the disruptive effects of interruption: a cognitive framework for analysing the costs and benefits of intervention strategies. Accid. Analys. Prev. 2009, 41:1124-1129.
5. Cellier J., Eyrolle H. Interface between switched tasks. Ergonomics 1992, 35(1):25-36.
6. Cooke N.J., Gorman J., Pedersen H., Bell B. Distributed mission environments: effects of geographic dispersion on team cognition and performance. Toward a Science of Distributed Learning 2007, 147-167. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC. S. Fiore, E. Salas (Eds.).
7. Cooke N.J., Gorman J.C. Assessment of team cognition. International Encyclopedia of Ergonomics and Human Factors 2006, 270-275. Taylor & Francis Ltd, London, UK. second ed. P. Karwowski (Ed.).
8. Czerwinski M., Cutrell E., Horvitz E. Instant messaging and interruption: influence of task type on performance. OZCHI 2000, Sydney, Australia 2000.
9. Daniels J., Regli S.H., Franke J.L. Support for intelligent interruption and augmented context recovery. IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants 2002 2002, vol. 7:15-21. Scottsdale, Arizona.
10. DiVita J., Obermayer R., Nugent W., Linville J.M. Verification of the change blindness phenomenon while managing critical events on a combat information display. Hum. Fact. 2004, 46:205-218.
11. Dodhia R.M., Dismukes R.K. Interruptions create prospective memory tasks. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2009, 23:73-89.
12. Durlach P.J. Change blindness and its implications for complex monitoring and control systems design and operator training. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2004, 19(4):423-451.
13. Gartenberg D., McCurry J.M., Trafton J.G. Situation awareness reacquisition in a supervisory control task. Proc. of 55th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2011, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Las Vegas, NV.
14. Gillie T., Broadbent D. What makes interruptions disruptive? A study of length, similarity, and complexity. Psychol. Res. 1989, 50:243-250.
15. Jett Q.R., George J.M. Work interrupted: a closer look at the role of interruptions in organizational life. Acad. Manage. Rev. 2003, 28(3):494-507.
16. Kieras D.E., Meyer D.E. An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Hum. Comput. Interact. 1997, 12:391-438.
17. Mintzberg H. Manager's job: folklore and fact. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1990, 163-176.
18. Nehme C.E., Scott S.D., Cummings M.L., Furusho C.Y. Generating requirements for futuristic heterogeneous unmanned systems. Proc. of HFES 2006: Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Francisco, CA 2006, 235-239.
19. Reder S., Schwab R.G. The temporal structure of cooperative activity. Proc.. of CSCW 1990: ACM Conference on Computer-supported Cooperative Work 1990, 303-316.
20. Rensink R.A. Change detection. Rev. Psych. 2002, 53:245-277.
21. Rensink R.A., O'Regan J.K., Clark J.J. To see or not to see: the need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psych. Sci. 1997, 8:368-373.
22. Sasangohar F. Improving Interruption Recovery in Human Supervisory Control (HSC) Domains 2009, Master's thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
23. Scott S.D., Mercier S., Cummings M.L., Wang E. Assisting interruption recovery in supervisory control of multiple UAVs. Proc. of HFES 2006: 50th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomic Society, San Francisco, CA, USA 2006, 699-703.
24. Scott S.D., Wan J., Sasangohar F., Cummings M.L. Mitigating supervisory-level interruptions in Mission control operations. Proceedings of 2nd Int'l Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Las Vegas, NV 2008.
25. Simons D.J., Ambinder M.S. Change blindness: theory and consequences. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2005, 14:44-48.
26. St.John M., Smallman H.S., Manes D.I. Recovery from interruptions to a dynamic monitoring task: the beguiling utility of instant replay. Proceedings of HFES 2005: 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA 2005, 473-477.
27. St.John M., Smallman H.S. Staying up to speed: four design principles for maintaining and recovering situation awareness. J.Cognit. Eng. Decis. Mak. 2008, 2(2):118-139.
28. Talbot D. Atechnology surges. Technol. Rev. March/April 2008, 70-74.
29. Trafton J., Altmann E.M., Brock D.P. Huh, what was I doing? How people use environmental cues after an interruption. Proc. of HFES 2005: 49th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Orlando, FL 2005, 468-472.
30. Trafton J.G., Altmann E.M., Brock D.P., Mintz F.E. Preparing to resume an interrupted task: effects of prospective goal encoding and retrospective rehearsal. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2003, 58(5):583-603.
31. Van Bergen A. Task Interruption 1968, North-Holland Publishing Co, Amsterdam.
32. Wan J., Scott S.D., Cummings M.L. Assisting Interruption Recovery in Mission Control Operations 2007, (No. HAL2007-03), Humans and Automation Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
33. Wolfe J.M. Guided search 2.0 a revised model of visual search. Psych. Bull. Rev. 1994, 1(2):202-238.