Off-clamp versus complete hilar control partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal of Endourology

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 567-576

  Liu, Wentao ^a   Li, Yuan ^a   Chen, Minfeng ^a   Gu, Li ^b   Tong, Shiyu ^a   Lei, Ye ^a   Qi, Lin ^a  

^a CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CENTRAL SOUTH UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CANCER SURGERY; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY FUNCTION; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; OFF CLAMP PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ON CLAMP PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PATIENT SAFETY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; URINE INCONTINENCE;

AGED; CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; NEPHRECTOMY; ODDS RATIO; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 84898990476     PISSN: 08927790     EISSN: 1557900X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0562     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hollingsworth JM, Miller DC, Daignault S, Hollenbeck BK. Rising incidence of small renal masses: A need to reassess treatment effect. J Natl Cancer Inst 2006;98:1331-1334.
2. Association AU. Education and research (AUA) guidelines: "guidelines for management of the clinical stage I renal mass." Renal mass clinical panel chairs: Novick AC (Chair), Campbell SC (co-chair), www.auanet.org/content/ media/renalmass09.pdf Accessed May 2012.
3. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR, et al. Comparison of 1, 800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 2007;178:41-46.
4. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial ne-phrectomy. Eur Urol 2010;58:340-345.
5. 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine scintigraphy parameter. Urology 2012;79:160-164.
6. George AK, Herati AS, Srinivasan AK, et al. Perioperative outcomes of off-clamp vs complete hilar control laparo-scopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2013;111(4 Pt B):E235-E241.
7. Kaczmarek BF, Tanagho YS, Hillyer SP, et al. Off-clamp Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy preserves renal function: A multi-institutional propensity score analysis. Eur Urol 2013;64:988-993.
8. Wszolek MF, Kenney PA, Lee Y, Libertino JA. Comparison of hilar clamping and non-hilar clamping partial ne-phrectomy for tumours involving a solitary kidney. BJU Int 2011;107:1886-1892.
9. Kopp RP, Mehrazin R, Palazzi K, Bazzi WM, Patterson AL, Derweesh IH. Factors affecting renal function after open partial nephrectomy-a comparison of clampless and clamped warm ischemic technique. Urology 2012;80:865-870.
10. Smith GL, Kenney PA, Lee Y, Libertino JA. Non-clamped partial nephrectomy: Techniques and surgical outcomes. BJU Int 2011;107:1054-1058.
11. Koo HJ, Lee DH, Kim IY. Renal hilar control during lap-aroscopic partial nephrectomy: To clamp or not to clamp. J Endourol 2010;24:1283-1287.
12. Krane LS, Mufarrij PW, Manny TB, Hemal AK. Comparison of clamping technique in robotic partial nephrectomy: Does unclamped partial nephrectomy improve periopera-tive outcomes and renal function? Can J Urol 2013;20:6662-6667.
13. Tanagho YS, Bhayani SB, Sandhu GS, Vaughn NP, Nepple KG, Figenshau RS. Renal functional and perioperative outcomes of off-clamp versus clamped robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: Matched cohort study. Urology 2012; 80:838-843.
14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010;8:336-341.
15. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I. Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 2005;5:13.
16. Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, et al. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation. Available at www.cebm.net/levelsofevidence.asp Accessed February 2014.
17. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998;52:377-384.
18. Shikanov S, Lifshitz DA, Deklaj T, Katz MH, Shalhav AL. Predicting collecting system transection at laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Analysis of tumor parameters. J En-dourol 2009;23:1863-1866.
19. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Five-year experience. Ann Surg 2009;250:187-196.
20. DerSimonian R, Laird N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986;7:177-188.
21. Mantel N, Haenszel W. Statistical aspects of the analysis of data from retrospective studies of disease. In: The Challenge of Epidemiology: Issues and Selected Readings. Washington, DC: Pan American Health Organization, 2004, pp 533-553.
22. Rais-Bahrami S, George AK, Herati AS, Srinivasan AK, Richstone L, Kavoussi LR. Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Comparison by clinical stage. BJU Int 2012;109:1376-1381.
23. Petrasz P, S1ojewski M, Sikorski A. Impact of "non-clamping technique" on intra and postoperative course after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Videosurg Other Miniinvasive Tech 2012;7:275-279.
24. Nguyen MM, Gill IS. Halving ischemia time during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008;179:627-632.
25. Shao P, Qin C, Yin C, et al. Laparoscopic partial ne-phrectomy with segmental renal artery clamping: Technique and clinical outcomes. Eur Urol 2011;59:849-855.
26. Thomas AZ, Smyth L, Hennessey D, O'Kelly F, Moran D, Lynch TH. Zero ischemia laparoscopic partial thulium laser nephrectomy. J Endourol 2013;27:1366-1370.
27. Sciarra A, Von Heland M, Minisola F, Salciccia S, Cattarino S, Gentile V. Thulium laser-supported nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2013;190: 698-701.
28. Rizkala ER, Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Samarasekera D, Laydner H, Kaouk JH. Zero ischemia robotic partial ne-phrectomy: Sequential preplaced suture renorrhaphy technique. Urology 2013;82:100-104.
29. Simone G, Papalia R, Guaglianone S, Gallucci M. 'Zero ischaemia', sutureless laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumours with a low nephrometry score. BJU Int 2012; 110:124-130.
30. Phillips JM, Narula N, Deane LA, et al. Histological evaluation of cold versus hot cutting: Clinical impact on margin status for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2008;180:2348-2352.
31. Gill IS, Eisenberg MS, Aron M, et al. "Zero ischemia" partial nephrectomy: Novel laparoscopic and robotic technique. Eur Urol 2011;59:128-134.
32. Turna B, Frota R, Kamoi K, et al. Risk factor analysis of postoperative complications in laparoscopic partial ne-phrectomy. J Urol 2008;179:1289-1295.
33. Wheat JC, Roberts WW, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS, Weizer AZ, eds. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrec-tomy. Urol Oncol 2011;31:57-62.
34. Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P, et al. Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2012;61: 757-763.
35. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Comparison of warm ischemia versus no ischemia during partial ne-phrectomy on a solitary kidney. Eur Urol 2010;58:331-336.