Teammate inaccuracy blindness: When information sharing tools hinder collaborative analysis

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 797-806

  Kang, Ruogu ^a   Kane, Aimée A ^b   Kiesler, Sara ^a  

^a Human Computer Interaction Institute Carnegie Mellon University ^*  (United States)

^b DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asynchronous collaboration; Collaborative analysis; Groups; Information sharing; Problem solving; Sensemaking; Teams

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; EYE PROTECTION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING; SCHEDULING; TOOLS;

ASYNCHRONOUS COLLABORATION; COLLABORATIVE ANALYSIS; GROUPS; INFORMATION SHARING; SENSEMAKING; TEAMS;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 84898978307     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2531602.2531681     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Abrams, D., M. Wetherell, S. Cochrane, M.A. Hogg, J.C. Turner. 1990. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology 29, (1990), 97-119.
2. Balakrishnan, A.D., Fussell, S.R., and Kiesler, S. Do visualizations improve synchronous remote collaboration? In Proc. of CHI 2008, (2008), 1227- 1236.
3. Bier, E.A., Card, S.K., and Bodnar, J.W. Entity-based collaboration tools for intelligence analysis. Visual Analytics Science and Technology, 2008. VAST'08. IEEE Symposium, (2008), 99-106.
4. Bruns, H. Working alone together. Coordination in collaboration across domains of expertise. Academy of Management Journal 56, 1 (2013), 62-83.
5. Chase, W. G., &Simon, H. A. Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology, 4 (1973), 55-81.
6. Chung, H., Yang, S., Massjouni, N., Andrews, C., Kanna, R., and North, C. VizCept: Supporting synchronous collaboration for constructing visualizations in intelligence analysis. Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2010 IEEE Symposium on, IEEE (2010), 107-114.
7. Cross, R., &Baird, L. Technology is not enough: Improving performance by building organizational memory. Sloan Management Review (Spring), (2000), 69-78.
8. Fisher, K., Counts, S., Kittur, A., and Ave, F. Distributed sensemaking : Improving sensemaking by leveraging the efforts of previous users. Proc. of CHI 2012, ACM Press (2012), 247-256.
9. Furtadoa, V., Ayresa, L, de Oliveirac, M., Vasconcelosb, E., Caminhaa, C., D'Orleansa, J., and Belchiora, M. Collective intelligence in law enforcement - The WikiCrimes system. Information Sciences 180, 1 (2010), 4-17.
10. Goyal, N., Leshed, G., and Fussell, S. Effects of visualization and note-taking on sensemaking and analysis. In Proc. of CHI 2013. ACM (2013), 2721-2724.
11. Hackman, J.R. Collaborative intelligence: Using teams to solve hard problems. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San Francisco, (2011).
12. Hansen, D. L., Schone, P. J., Corey, D., Reid, M., &Gehring, J. Quality control mechanisms for crowdsourcing: peer review, arbitration, &expertise at familysearch indexing. In Proc. CSCW 2013, ACM Press (2013), 649-660.
13. Heer, J., Viégas, F.B., and Wattenberg, M. Voyagers and voyeurs: Supporting asynchronous collaborative visualization. Communications of the ACM 52, 1 (2009), 87-97.
14. Janis, I. L. Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, (1972).
15. Kane, A. A., Argote, L., &Levine, J. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes 96, 1 (2005), 56-71.
16. Kang, R. and Kiesler, S. Do collaborators ' annotations help or hurt asynchronous analysis? In Proc. CSCW 2012, ACM Press (2012), 123-126.
17. Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., and Haider, H. Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25, (1999), 1534-1555.
18. Laughlin, P.R., B.L. Bonner, A.G. Miner, P.J. Carnevale. Frames of reference in quantity estimations by groups and individuals. Organanizatioal Behavior and Human Decision Processes 80, 2 (1999), 103-117.
19. Laughlin, P.R., A.L. Ellis. Demonstrability and social combination processes on mathematical intellective tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22, 3 (1986), 177-189.
20. Lojeski, K.S., Reilly, R., and Dominick, P. The role of virtual distance in innovation and success. Proc. Conf on System Sciences (HICSS'06), (2006), 25c-25c.
21. McCaffrey, T. Innovation relies on the obscure: A key to overcoming the classic problem of functional fixedness. Psychological Science 23, 3 (2012), 215-218.
22. Mednick, S. The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69, 3 (1962), 220.
23. Mesmer-Magnus, J.R. and DeChurch, L.A. Information sharing and team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 94, 2 (2009), 535.
24. Munro, A.J., Höök, K., and Benyon, D.R. Personal and social navigation of information space. Springer-Verlag London, (1999).
25. Nickerson, R. S. Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2 (1998),175-220.
26. Nobarany, S., Haraty, M., &Fisher, B. Facilitating the reuse process in distributed collaboration: A distributed cognition approach. In Proc. of CSCW 2012, ACM Press (2012), 1223-1232.
27. Pioch, N.J. and Everett, J.O. POLESTAR: collaborative knowledge management and sensemaking tools for intelligence analysts. Proceedings of the 15th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management, ACM (2006), 513-521.
28. Pirolli, P. and Card, S. The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, (2005), 2-4.
29. Pirolli, P. and Russell, D.M. Introduction to special issue on sensemaking. Human Computer Interaction, (2011), 1-8.
30. Reagans, R., &McEvily, B. Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly 48, 2 (2003), 240-267.
31. Ren, Y. and Argote, L. Transactive memory systems 1985-2010 : An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals 5, 1 (2011), 189-229.
32. SAS Knowledge Base Two-Factor Logistic Model Using Dummy and Effects Coding http://support.sas.com/kb/24/447.html#ex3
33. Stasko, J., Goerg, C., and Liu, Z. Jigsaw: Supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Information Visualization 7, 2 (2008), 118-132.
34. Stokes, M.E., David, C. S., Koch, G. G. Categorical data analysis using the SAS system (2nd Ed). Cary, NC: SAS.
35. Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Dykema-Engblade, A., and Kluwe, K. Good and bad group performance: Same processes-different outcomes. Group Processes &Intergroup Relations 15, (2012), 603-618.
36. Towne, W. B., Kittur, A., Kinnaird, P., &Herbsleb, J. Your process is showing: controversy management and perceived quality in wikipedia. In Proc. of CSCW 2013, ACM Press (2013), 1059-1068.
37. Weng, C. and Gennari, J.H. Asynchronous collaborative writing through annotations. In Proc. of CSCW 2004, ACM (2004), 578-581.
38. Wright, D. B., &Mathews, S. A., &Skagerberg, E.M. Social recognition memory: The effect of other people's responses for previously seen and unseen items. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 11, 3 (2005), 200-209.