Influence of auditory and audiovisual stimuli on the right-left prevalence effect

Psychological Research

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 400-410

  Vu, Kim Phuong L ^a   Minakata, Katsumi ^a   Ngo, Mary Kim ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEARING; HUMAN; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CUES; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 84898943936     PISSN: 03400727     EISSN: 14302772     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-013-0518-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chan, C. W. L., & Chan, A. H. S. (2005). Spatial S-R compatibility of visual and auditory signals: implications for human-machine interface design. Displays, 26, 109-119.
2. Colavita, F. B. (1974). Human sensory dominance. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 409-412.
3. Eimer, M., & Schröger, E. (1998). ERP effects of intermodal attention and cross-modal links in spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 35, 313-327.
4. Haas, E., & Edworthy, J. (2006). An introduction to auditory warnings and alarms. In M. S. Wogalter (Ed.), Handbook of warnings (pp. 189-198). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
5. Heister, G., Ehrenstein, W. H., & Schroeder-Heister, P. (1986). Spatial SR compatibility effects with unimanual two-finger choice reactions for prone and supine hand positions. Perception and Psychophysics, 40(4), 271-278.
6. Hommel, B. (1996). No prevalence of right-left over top-bottom spatial codes. Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 102-110.
7. Keller, P. E., & Koch, I. (2006). Exogenous and endogenous response priming with auditory stimuli. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 2(4), 269-276.
8. Lee, F. C. H., & Chan, A. H. S. (2007). Attending visual and auditory signals: ergonomics recommendations with consideration of signal modality and spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 37, 197-206.
9. Lidji, P., Kolinsky, R., Lochy, A., & Morais, J. (2007). Spatial associations for musical stimuli: a piano in the head? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 1189-1207.
10. Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986). Visual, auditory, and somatosensory convergence on cells in the superior colliculus results in multisensory integration. Journal of Neurophysiology, 56, 640-662.
11. Ngo, M. K., Sinnett, S., Soto-Faraco, S., & Spence, C. (2010). Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect. Neuroscience Letters, 480, 186-190.
12. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1984). Right-left prevalence in spatial compatibility. Perception and Psychophysics, 35, 333-343.
13. Nicoletti, R., & Umiltà, C. (1985). Responding with hand and foot: the right/left prevalence in spatial compatibility is still present. Perception and Psychophysics, 38, 211-216.
14. Nicoletti, R., Umiltà, C., Tressoldi, E. P., & Marzi, C. A. (1988). Why are right-left spatial codes easier to form than above-below ones? Perception and Psychophysics, 43, 287-292.
15. Nishimura, A., & Yokosawa, K. (2009). Effects of laterality and pitch height of an auditory accessory stimulus on horizontal response selection: the Simon effect and the SMARC effect. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 16, 666-670.
16. Perrott, D. R., & Saberi, K. (1990). Minimum audible angle thresholds for sources varying in both elevation and azimuth. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 1728.
17. Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K.-P. L. (2006). Stimulus-response compatibility principles: data theory and application. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
18. Rubichi, S., Vu, K.-P. L., Nicoletti, R., & Proctor, R. W. (2006). Spatial coding in two dimensions. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 13, 201-216.
19. Rusconi, E., Kwana, B., Giordano, B. L., Umiltà, C., & Butterworth, B. (2006). Spatial representation of pitch height: the SMARC effect. Cognition, 99, 113-129.
20. Santagelo, V., & Spence, C. (2008). Capturing spatial attention with multisensory cues. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 15, 398-403.
21. Scharf, B. (1998). Auditory attention: the psychoacoustical approach. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 75-118). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
22. Sinnett, S., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited. Perception and Psychophysics, 69, 673-686.
23. Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2001). Determinants of right-left and top-bottom prevalence for two-dimensional spatial compatibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 813-828.
24. Vu, K.-P. L., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). The prevalence effect in two-dimensional stimulus-response compatibility as a function of the relative salience of the dimensions. Perception and Psychophysics, 64, 815-828.
25. Vu, K.-P. L., Proctor, R. W., & Pick, D. F. (2000). Horizontal versus vertical compatibility: right-left prevalence with bimanual responses. Psychological Research, 64, 25-40.
26. Welch, R. B., & Warren, D. H. (1980). Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 638.