Repetition blindness and the Colavita effect

Neuroscience Letters

Volumn 480, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 186-190

  Ngo, Mary Kim ^a   Sinnett, Scott ^b   Soto Faraco, Salvador ^c,d   Spence, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Auditory dominance; Colavita; Repetition blindness; Visual dominance

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; AUDITORY RESPONSE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COLAVITA EFFECT; EYE DOMINANCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOUND; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77954953751     PISSN: 03043940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2010.06.028     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bertelson P., Vroomen J., de Gelder B., Driver J. The ventriloquist effect does not depend on the direction of deliberate visual attention. Percept. Psychophys. 2000, 62:321-332.
2. Calvert G.A., Spence C., Stein B.A. The Handbook of Multisensory Processes 1993, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Chen K.-M., Yeh S.L. Asymmetric cross-modal effects in time perception. Acta Psychol. 2009, 130:225-234.
4. Colavita F.B. Human sensory dominance. Percept. Psychophys. 1974, 16:409-412.
5. Colavita F.B., Weisberg D. A further investigation of visual dominance. Percept. Psychophys. 1979, 25:345-347.
6. Driver J., Noesselt T. Multisensory interplay reveals crossmodal influences on 'sensory-specific' brain regions, neural responses, and judgments. Neuron 2008, 57:11-23.
7. Egeth H.E., Sager L.C. On the locus of visual dominance. Percept. Psychophys. 1977, 22:77-86.
8. Forster B., Cavina-Pratesi C., Aglioti S.M., Berlucchi G. Redundant target effect and intersensory facilitation from visual-tactile interactions in simple reaction time. Exp. Brain Res. 2002, 143:480-487.
9. Gebhard J.W., Mowbray G.H. On discriminating the rate of visual flicker and auditory flutter. Am. J. Psychol. 1959, 72:521-528.
10. Giard M.H., Peronnet F. Auditory-visual integration during multimodal object recognition in humans: a behavioral and electrophysiological study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 1999, 11:473-490.
11. Hein G., Parr A., Duncan J., Within-modality cross-modality attentional blinks in a simple discrimination task. Percept. Psychophys. 2006, 68:54-61.
12. Howard I.P., Templeton W.B. Human Spatial Orientation 1966, Wiley, London, 533 pp.
13. Kanwisher N.G. Repetition blindness: type recognition without token individuation. Cognition 1987, 27:117-143.
14. Koppen C., Alsius A., Spence C. Semantic congruency and the Colavita visual dominance effect. Exp. Brain Res. 2008, 184:533-546.
15. Koppen C., Levitan C., Spence C. A signal detection study of the Colavita effect. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 196:353-360.
16. Koppen C., Spence C. Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 180:737-754.
17. Koppen C., Spence C. Assessing the role of stimulus probability on the Colavita visual dominance effect. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 418:266-271.
18. Koppen C., Spence C. Audiovisual asynchrony modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect. Brain Res. 2007, 1186:224-232.
19. Koppen C., Spence C. Spatial coincidence modulates the Colavita visual dominance effect. Neurosci. Lett. 2007, 417:107-111.
20. McKeeff T.J., Remus D.A., Tong F. Temporal limitations in object processing across the human ventral visual pathway. J. Neurophysiol. 2007, 98:382-393.
21. Molhom S., Ritter W., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J. Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Cereb. Cortex 2004, 14:452-465.
22. Morein-Zamir S., Soto-Faraco S., Kingstone A. Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 17:154-163.
23. M. K. Ngo, C. Spence, Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target identification, Atten. Percept. Psychophys. (in press).
24. Nickerson R.S. Intersensory facilitation of reaction time: energy summation or preparation enhancement. Psychol. Rev. 1973, 80:489-509.
25. O'Connor N., Hermelin B. Seeing and hearing in space and time. Percept. Psychophys. 1972, 11:46-48.
26. Rees G., Russell C., Frith C.D., Driver J. Inattentional blindness versus inattentional amnesia for fixated but ignored words. Science 1999, 286:2504-2507.
27. Shams L., Kamitani Y., Shimojo S. What you see is what you hear. Nature 2000, 408:788.
28. Shimojo S., Shams L. Sensory modalities are not separate modalities: plasticity and interactions. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2001, 11:505-509.
29. Shipley T. Auditory flutter-driving of visual flicker. Science 1964, 145:1328-1330.
30. Sinnett S., Soto-Faraco S., Spence S. The co-occurrence of multisensory competition and facilitation. Acta Psychol. 2008, 128:153-161.
31. Sinnett S., Spence C., Soto-Faraco S. Visual dominance and attention: the Colavita effect revisited. Percept. Psychophys. 2007, 69:673-686.
32. Snodgrass J.G., Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Learn. Mem. 1980, 6:174-215.
33. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C. Modality-specific auditory and visual temporal processing deficits. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 2002, 55A:23-40.
34. Soto-Faraco S., Spence C., Kingstone A. Cross-modal dynamic capture: congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. J. Exp. Psychol. Human 2004, 30:330-345.
35. Spence C. Explaining the Colavita visual dominance effect. Prog. Brain Res. 2009, 176:245-258.
36. Stein B.E., Meredith M.A. The Merging of the Senses 1993, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
37. Stein B.E., Stanford T.R. Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9:255-266.
38. Vroomen J., de Gelder B. Sound enhances visual perception: cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 2000, 26:1583-1590.
39. Walker J.T., Scott K.J. Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones, and gaps. J. Exp. Psychol. Human Percept. Perform. 1981, 7:1327-1339.
40. Welch R.B., Duttonhurt L.D., Warren D.H. Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception. Percept. Psychophys. 1986, 39:294-300.
41. Welch R.B., Warren D.H. Immediate perceptual response to intersensory discrepancy. Psychol. Bull. 1980, 88:638-667.
42. Welch R.B., Warren D.H. Intersensory interactions. Handbook of Perception and Human Performance: Sensory Processes in Perception 1986, vol. I:1-36. Wiley, New York.