How a new issue becomes an owned issue. Media coverage and the financial crisis in belgium (2008-2009)

International Journal of Public Opinion Research

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 86-97

  De Bruycker, Iskander ^a   Walgrave, Stefaan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898936529     PISSN: 09542892     EISSN: 14716909     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ijpor/edt003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Aalberg, T., & Jenssen, A. T. (2007). Do television debates in multiparty systems affect viewers? A quasi-experimental study with first-time voters. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 115-135. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477. 2007.00175.x
2. Allison, P. (1999). Multiple regression?A primer. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
3. Budge, I., & Farlie, D. (1983). Explaining and predicting elections. London: Allen & Urwin.
4. Chappell, H., & Keech, W. (1985). A new view of political accountability for economic performance. The American Political Science Review, 79, 10-27.
5. Entman, R. (1993). Framing: Toward clariEcation of a fractured paradigm. Journal ofCommunication, 43, 51-58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
6. Gamson, W., & Modigliani, A. (1987). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1-37.
7. Green-Pedersen, C., & Mortensen, P. (2009). Who sets the agenda and who responds to it in the danish parliament? A new model of issue competition andagenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 49, 257-281. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01897.x
8. Klingemann, H., Hofferbert, R., & Budge, I. (1994). Parties, policies and democracy. Oxford: West view Press.
9. Kuklinski, J., & West, D. (1981). Economic expectations and voting behavior in United States house and Senate elections. The American Political Science Review,75, 436-447.
10. Lewis-Beck, M., & Stegmaier, M. (2000). Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183-219. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183
11. Petrocik, J. (1996). Issue ownership and presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 825-850.
12. Ramsden, G. (1996). Media coverage of issues and candidates: What is the appropriate balance? Political Science Quarterly, 111, 65-68.
13. Scheufele, D. (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication,49, 103-122. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02784.x
14. Scheufele, D., & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57, 9-20.doi:10.1111/j.0021-9916.2007.00326.x
15. Sheafer, T. (2008). The media and economic voting in Israël. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 20, 33-51. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edn004
16. Walgrave, S., & De Swert, K. (2007). Where does issue ownership come from? From the party or from the media? Issue-party Identifications in Belgium, 1991-2005. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 12, 37-67. doi:10.1177/1081180X06297572
17. Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Nuytemans, M. (2009). Issue ownership stability and change. how political parties claim and maintain issues through media appearances. Political Communication, 26, 153-172. doi:10.1080/ 10584600902850718
18. Walgrave, S., Lefevere, J., & Tresch, A. (2012). The associative dimension of issue ownership. Public Opinion Quarterly, Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/poq/nfs023