Optimization on response surface methodology for preparing V2O5 from industrial ammonium metavanadate

High Temperature Materials and Processes

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 155-160

  Chen, Yuxiang ^a   Zhang, Bin ^a   Guo, Shenghui ^a   Peng, Jinhui ^a   Guo, Lei ^a   Song, Zengkai ^a  

^a KUNMING UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

calcination; model; optimization; vanadium pentoxide

Indexed keywords

CALCINATION; INDUSTRY; MODELS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; VANADIUM COMPOUNDS;

AMMONIUM METAVANADATE; CALCINATION TEMPERATURE; CENTRAL COMPOSITE DESIGNS; DETERMINATION COEFFICIENTS; OPTIMUM CONDITIONS; QUADRATIC EQUATIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; VANADIUM PENTOXIDE;

OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84898931293     PISSN: 03346455     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/htmp-2013-0049     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. A. Singhal, G. Skandan, G. Amatucci, F. Badway, N. Ye, A. Manthiram, A. Manthiram, H. Ye, J.J. Xu. J. Power Sources, 2004, 129: 38.
2. J.F. Liu, X. Wang, Q. Peng, Y.D. Li. Sens. Actuators B, 2006, 115: 481.
3. B.M. Weckhuysen, D.E. Keller. Catal. Today, 2003, 78: 25
4. J.B. Goodenough. Solid State Chem., 1971, 5: 45.
5. C. Julien, B. Yebka, J.P. Guesdon. Ionics, 1995, 4: 316.
6. D. Wruck, S. Ramamurthi, M. Rubin. Thin Solid Films, 1989, 182: 79.
7. 5 nanocrystalline thin films. Thin Solid Films, 2001, 384(1): 58-64. (Pubitemid 32196572)
8. N. Ozer. Electrochemical properties of sol gel deposited vanadium pentoxide films. Thin Solid Films, 1997, 305(1-2): 80-87. (Pubitemid 127377653)
9. E. Cazzanelli, G. Mariotto, S. Passerini, W.H. Smyrl, A. Gorenstein. Raman and XPS characterization of vanadium oxide thin films deposited by reactive RF sputtering, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 1999, 56(3-4): 249-258.
10. 5 films. J. Electroanal. Chem., 1998, 443(2): 175-179. (Pubitemid 128391920)
11. R.H. Myers, D.C. Montgomery. Response Surface Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, USA, 2002.
12. M.J. Chen, K.N. Chen, C.W. Lin. Optimization on response surface models for the optimal manufacturing conditions of dairy tofu. Journal of Food Engineering, 2005, 68(4): 471-480.
13. B. Kiran, A. Kaushik, C.P. Kaushik. Response surface methodological approach for optimizing removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using immobilized cyanobacterium. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 126(2-3): 147-153. (Pubitemid 46205360)
14. S. Mohana, S. Shrivastava, J. Divecha, D. Madamwar. Response surface methodology for optimization of medium for decolorization of textile dye Direct Black 22 by a novel bacterial consortium. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(3): 562-569. (Pubitemid 350051902)
15. 5 by calcination form ammonium metavanadate using response surface methodology. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2011, 21(3): 673-678.
16. R. Azargohar, A.K. Dalai. Production of activated carbon from Luscar char: Experimental and modeling studies. Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 2005, 85(3): 219-225. (Pubitemid 41409381)
17. W.J. Hill, W.G. Hunter. A review of response surface methodology: a literature review. Tecimometrics, 1966, 8: 571-590.
18. A.L. Ahmad, S.C. Low, S.R. Abd Shukor, A. Ismail. Optimization of membrane performance by thermal-mechanical stretching process using responses surface methodology (RSM). Separation and Purification Technology, 2009, 66(1): 177-186.