An economic analysis of prenatal cytogenetic technologies for sonographically detected fetal anomalies

American Journal of Medical Genetics, Part A

Volumn 164, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1192-1197

  Harper, Lorie M ^a   Sutton, Amelia L M ^a   Longman, Ryan E ^b   Odibo, Anthony O ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH); Chromosomal microarray (CMA); Congenital anomalies; Cost effectiveness analysis; Ultrasonic prenatal diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOMAL MICROARRAY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETICS; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS MALFORMATION; HUMAN; KARYOTYPING; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION TREE; ECONOMICS; GENETICS; INCIDENCE; META ANALYSIS;

CONGENITAL ABNORMALITIES; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; CYTOGENETIC ANALYSIS; DECISION TREES; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; MONTE CARLO METHOD; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, PRENATAL;

EID: 84898887023     PISSN: 15524825     EISSN: 15524833     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.36435     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2009. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 446: Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 114:1161-1163.
2. Aston E, Whitby H, Maxwell T, Glaus N, Cowley B, Lowry D, Zhu XL, Issa B, South ST, Brothman AR. 2008. Comparison of targeted and whole genome analysis of postnatal specimens using a commercially available array based comparative genomic hybridisation (aCGH) microarray platform. J Med Genet 45:268-274.
3. Biggio JR Jr, Morris TC, Owen J, Stringer JS. 2004. An outcomes analysis of five prenatal screening strategies for trisomy 21 in women younger than 35 years. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:721-729.
4. Brady PD, Vermeesch JR. 2012. Genomic microarrays: A technology overview. Prenat Diagn 32:336-343.
5. Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb AN, Torchia BS, Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG. 2009. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Prenat Diagn 29:1156-1166.
6. Faas BH, van der Burgt I, Kooper AJ, Pfundt R, Hehir-Kwa JY, Smits AP, de Leeuw N. 2010. Identification of clinically significant, submicroscopic chromosome alterations and UPD in fetuses with ultrasound anomalies using genome-wide 250k SNP array analysis. J Med Genet 47:586-594.
7. Ganesamoorthy D, Bruno D, McGillivray G, Norris F, White S, Adroub S, Amor D, Yeung A, Oertel R, Pertile M, Ngo C, Arvaj A, Walker S, Charan P, Palma-Dias R, Woodrow N, Slater H. 2013. Meeting the challenge of interpreting high-resolution single nucleotide polymorphism array data in prenatal diagnosis: Does increased diagnostic power outweigh the dilemma of rare variants? BJOG 120:594-606.
8. Hillman SC, Pretlove S, Coomarasamy A, McMullan DJ, Davison EV, Maher ER, Kilby MD. 2011. Additional information from array comparative genomic hybridization technology over conventional karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:6-14.
9. Kleeman L, Bianchi DW, Shaffer LG, Rorem E, Cowan J, Craigo SD, Tighiouart H, Wilkins-Haug LE. 2009. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype. Prenat Diagn 29:1213-1217.
10. Lapierre JM, Cacheux V, Luton D, Collot N, Oury JF, Aurias A, Tachdjian G. 2000. Analysis of uncultured amniocytes by comparative genomic hybridization: a prospective prenatal study. Prenat Diagn 20:123-131.
11. Le Caignec C, Boceno M, Saugier-Veber P, Jacquemont S, Joubert M, David A, Frebourg T, Rival JM. 2005. Detection of genomic imbalances by array based comparative genomic hybridisation in fetuses with multiple malformations. J Med Genet 42:121-128.
12. Maya I, Davidov B, Gershovitz L, Zalzstein Y, Taub E, Coppinger J, Shaffer LG, Shohat M. 2010. Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting. Prenat Diagn 30:1131-1137.
13. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, Biesecker LG, Brothman AR, Carter NP, Church DM, Crolla JA, Eichler EE, Epstein CJ, Faucett WA, Feuk L, Friedman JM, Hamosh A, Jackson L, Kaminsky EB, Kok K, Krantz ID, Kuhn RM, Lee C, Ostell JM, Rosenberg C, Scherer SW, Spinner NB, Stavropoulos DJ, Tepperberg JH, Thorland EC, Vermeesch JR, Waggoner DJ, Watson MS, Martin CL, Ledbetter DH. 2010. Consensus statement: Chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 86:749-764.
14. Odibo AO, Stamilio DM, Nelson DB, Sehdev HM, Macones GA. 2005. A cost-effectiveness analysis of prenatal screening strategies for Down syndrome. Obstet Gynecol 106:562-568.
15. Park JH, Woo JH, Shim SH, Yang SJ, Choi YM, Yang KS, Cha DH. 2010. Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis. BMC Med Genet 11:102.
16. Regier DA, Friedman JM, Marra CA. 2010. Value for money? Array genomic hybridization for diagnostic testing for genetic causes of intellectual disability. Am J Hum Genet 86:765-772.
17. Rickman L, Fiegler H, Shaw-Smith C, Nash R, Cirigliano V, Voglino G, Ng BL, Scott C, Whittaker J, AdinolfiM, Carter NP, Bobrow M. 2006. Prenatal detection of unbalanced chromosomal rearrangements by array CGH. J Med Genet 43:353-361.
18. Rizzo N, Pittalis MC, Pilu G, Perolo A, Banzi C, Visentin A, Bovicelli L. 1996. Distribution of abnormal karyotypes among malformed fetuses detected by ultrasound throughout gestation. Prenat Diagn 16:159-163.
19. Sahoo T, Cheung SW, Ward P, Darilek S, Patel A, del Gaudio D, Kang SH, Lalani SR, Li J, McAdoo S, Burke A, Shaw CA, Stankiewicz P, Chinault AC, Van den Veyver IB, Roa BB, Beaudet AL, Eng CM. 2006. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 8:719-727.
20. Savage MS, Mourad MJ, Wapner RJ. 2011. Evolving applications of microarray analysis in prenatal diagnosis. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 23:103-108.
21. Schaaf CP, Wiszniewska J, Beaudet AL. 2011. Copy number and SNP arrays in clinical diagnostics. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 12:25-51.
22. Shaffer LG, Coppinger J, Alliman S, Torchia BA, Theisen A, Ballif BC, Bejjani BA. 2008. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenat Diagn 28:789-795.
23. Shaffer LG, Lupski JR. 2000. Molecular mechanisms for constitutional chromosomal rearrangements in humans. Annu Rev Genet 34:297-329.
24. Shaffer LG, Dabell MP, Fisher AJ, Coppinger J, Bandholz AM, Ellison JW, Ravnan JB, Torchia BS, Ballif BC, Rosenfeld JA. 2012. Experience with microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis in over 5000 pregnancies. Prenat Diagn 32:976-985.
25. Srebniak M, Boter M, Oudesluijs G, Joosten M, Govaerts L, Van Opstal D, Galjaard RJ. 2011. Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: Implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow. Eur J Hum Genet 19:1230-1237.
26. Srebniak MI, Boter M, Oudesluijs GO, Cohen-Overbeek T, Govaerts LC, Diderich KE, Oegema R, Knapen MF, van de Laar IM, Joosten M, Van Opstal D, Galjaard RJ. 2012. Genomic SNP array as a gold standard for prenatal diagnosis of foetal ultrasound abnormalities. Mol Cytogenet 5:14.
27. Tyreman M, Abbott KM, Willatt LR, Nash R, Lees C, Whittaker J, Simonic I. 2009. High resolution array analysis: diagnosing pregnancies with abnormal ultrasound findings. J Med Genet 46:531-541.
28. Ubel PA, Hirth RA, Chernew ME, Fendrick AM. 2003. What is the price of life and why doesn't it increase at the rate of inflation? Arch Intern Med 163:1637-1641.
29. Vialard F, Molina Gomes D, Leroy B, Quarello E, Escalona A, Le Sciellour C, Serazin V, Roume J, Ville Y, de Mazancourt P, Selva J. 2009. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 25:277-284.
30. Wapner RJ, Driscoll DA, Simpson JL. 2012a. Integration of microarray technology into prenatal diagnosis: Counselling issues generated during the NICHD clinical trial. Prenat Diagn 32:396-400.
31. Wapner RJ, Martin CL, Levy B, Ballif BC, Eng CM, Zachary JM, Savage M, Platt LD, Saltzman D, Grobman WA, Klugman S, Scholl T, Simpson JL, McCall K, Aggarwal VS, Bunke B, Nahum O, Patel A, Lamb AN, Thom EA, Beaudet AL, Ledbetter DH, Shaffer LG, Jackson L. 2012b. Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis. N Engl J Med 367:2175-2184.
32. Wei Y, Xu F, Li P. 2013. Technology-driven and evidence-based genomic analysis for integrated pediatric and prenatal genetics evaluation. J Genet Genomics 40:1-14.
33. Wilson RD, Chitayat D, McGillivray BC. 1992. Fetal ultrasound abnormalities: correlation with fetal karyotype, autopsy findings, and postnatal outcome--five-year prospective study. Am J Med Genet 44:586-590.