Diagnostic utility of array-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) in a prenatal setting

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 30, Issue 12-13, 2010, Pages 1131-1137

  Maya, Idit ^a   Davidov, Bella ^a   Gershovitz, Liron ^a   Zalzstein, Yael ^a   Taub, Ellen ^a   Coppinger, Justine ^b   Shaffer, Lisa G ^b   Shohat, Mordechai ^a,c  

^a RABIN MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b PerkinElmer   (United States)

^c TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Comparative genomic hybridization; Prenatal diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FETUS; FETUS ECHOGRAPHY; FETUS MALFORMATION; GENE DELETION; GENE DUPLICATION; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; KARYOTYPE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT;

ADULT; ALGORITHMS; AMNIOCENTESIS; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 78649675161     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.2626     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. ACOG. 2001. Prenatal diagnosis of fetal chromosome abnormalities. ACOG Practice Bulletin No.27.
2. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 446. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. 2009. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis. Obstet Gynecol 114: 1161-1163.
3. Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG. 2006a. Application of array-based comparative genomic hybridization to clinical diagnostics. J Mol Diagn 8: 528-533.
4. Bejjani BA, Shaffer LG. 2006b. Targeted array CGH. J Mol Diagn 8: 537-539.
5. Caughey AB, Washington AE, Gildengorin V, Kuppermann M. 2004. Assessment of demand for prenatal diagnostic testing using willingness to pay. Obstet Gynecol 103: 539-545.
6. Cheung SW, Shaw CA, Yu W, et al. 2005. Development and validation of a CGH microarray for clinical cytogenetic diagnosis. Genet Med 7: 422-432.
7. Coppinger J, Alliman S, Lamb AN, et al. 2009. Whole-genome microarray analysis in prenatal specimens identifies clinically significant chromosome alterations without increase in results of unclear significance compared to targeted microarray. Prenat Diagn 29: 1156-1166.
8. Evans MI, Henry GP, Miller WA, et al. 1999. International, collaborative assessment of 146, 000 prenatal karyotypes: expected limitations if only chromosome-specific chromosome specific probes and fluorescent in-situ hybridization are used. Hum Reprod 14: 1213-1216.
9. Harris RA, Washington AE, Nease RF Jr, Kuppermann M. 2004. Cost utility of prenatal diagnosis and the risk-based threshold. Lancet 363: 276-282.
10. Kallioniemi A, Kallioniemi OP, Sudar D, et al. 1992. Comparative genomic hybridization for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science 258: 818-821.
11. Kao YS, Kao GA, Walters CS. 1990. Banding resolution of amniotic cell chromosome preparations for prenatal diagnosis. Am J Clin Pathol 93: 765-770.
12. Kleeman L, Bianchi DW, Shaffer LG, et al. 2009. Use of array comparative genomic hybridization for prenatal diagnosis of fetuses with sonographic anomalies and normal metaphase karyotype. Prenat Diagn 29: 1213-1217.
13. Kuppermann M, Norton ME. 2005. Prenatal testing guidelines: time for a new approach. Gynecol Obstet Invest 60: 6-10.
14. Leung WC, Waters JJ, Chitty L. 2004. Prenatal diagnosis by rapid aneuploidy detection and karyotyping: a prospective study of the role of ultrasound in 1589 second-trimester amniocenteses. Prenat Diagn 24: 790-795.
15. Mefford HC, Sharp AJ, Baker C, et al. 2008. Recurrent rearrangements of chromosome 1q21.1 and variable pediatric phenotypes. N Engl J Med 359: 1685-1699.
16. Miller DT, Adam MP, Aradhya S, et al. 2010. Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies. Am J Hum Genet 86: 749-764.
17. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. 1998. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet 20: 207-211.
18. Sahoo T, Cheung SW, Ward P, et al. 2006. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal abnormalities using array-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genet Med 8: 719-727.
19. Shaffer LG, Bui TH. 2007. Molecular cytogenetic and rapid aneuploidy detection methods in prenatal diagnosis. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 145C: 87-98.
20. Shaffer LG, Coppinger J, Alliman S, et al. 2008. Comparison of microarray-based detection rates for cytogenetic abnormalities in prenatal and neonatal specimens. Prenat Diagn 28: 789-795.
21. Shohat M, Frimer H, Shohat-Levy V, et al. 2003. Prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: ten year experience in the Israeli population. Am J Med Genet 122A: 215-222.
22. Tepperberg J, Pettenati MJ, Rao PN, et al. 2001. Prenatal diagnosis using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): 2-year multi-center retrospective study and review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 21: 293-301.
23. Valduga M, Philippe C, Bach Segura P, et al. 2010. A retrospective study by oligonucleotide array-CGH analysis in 50 fetuses with multiple malformations. Prenat Diagn 30: 333-341.
24. Veltman JA, de Vries BBA. 2006. Diagnostic genome profiling: unbiased whole genome or targeted analysis? J Mol Diagn 8: 534-537.
25. Van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Polak-Knook J, Galjaard RJ. 2006. (Potential) false-negative diagnoses in chorionic villi and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 26: 401-408.
26. Van den Veyver IB, Patel A, Shaw CA, et al. 2009. Clinical use of array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) for prenatal diagnosis in 300 cases. Prenat Diagn 29: 29-39.
27. Vialard F, Molina Gomes D, Leroy B, et al. 2009. Array comparative genomic hybridization in prenatal diagnosis: another experience. Fetal Diagn Ther 25: 277-284.
28. Ward BE, Gersen SL, Carelli MP, et al. 1993. Rapid prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal aneuploidies by fluorescence in situ hybridization: clinical experience with 4, 500 specimens. Am J Hum Genet 52: 854-865.
29. Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JD. 1999. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridisation. Nucleic Acids Res 27: 1214-1218.
30. Wells D, Delhanty JD. 2000. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome amplification and single cell comparative genomic hybridization. Mol Hum Reprod 6: 1055-1062.