Bias from removing read duplication in ultra-deep sequencing experiments

Bioinformatics

Volumn 30, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 1073-1080

  Zhou, Wanding ^a   Chen, Tenghui ^a   Zhao, Hao ^a   Eterovic, Agda Karina ^a   Meric Bernstam, Funda ^a   Mills, Gordon B ^a   Chen, Ken ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MD ANDERSON CANCER CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA SEQUENCE; HIGH THROUGHPUT SEQUENCING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALLELES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; HIGH-THROUGHPUT NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84898881845     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt771     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Abramowitz, M. and Stegun, I.A. (1972) Stirling numbers of the second kind. In: Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables. Chapter 24.14, 9th edn. Dover, New York, pp. 824-825.
2. Aird, D. et al. (2011) Analyzing and minimizing PCR amplification bias in Illumina sequencing libraries. Genome Biol., 12, R18.
3. Baumann, D.D. and Doerge, R.W. (2013) Robust adjustment of sequence tag abundance. Bioinformatics, [Epub ahead of print, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt575].
4. Cibulskis, K. et al. (2013) Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples. Nat. Biotechnol., 31, 213-219.
5. DePristo, M.A. et al. (2011) A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat. Genet., 43, 491-498.
6. Dewal, N. et al. (2010) Power to detect selective allelic amplification in genome-wide scans of tumor data. Bioinformatics, 26, 518-528.
7. Ding, L. et al. (2012) Clonal evolution in relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia revealed by whole-genome sequencing. Nature, 481, 506-510.
8. Farhangfar, C.J. et al. (2013) The impact of tumor heterogeneity on patient treatment decisions. Clin. Chem., 59, 38-40.
9. Gerlinger, M. et al. (2012) Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med., 366, 838-892.
10. Li, H. et al. (2009) The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics, 25, 2078-2079.
11. Mardis, E.R. (2011) A decade's perspective on DNA sequencing technology. Nature, 470, 198-203.
12. Mezlini, A.M. et al. (2013) iReckon: simultaneous isoform discovery and abundance estimation from RNA-seq data. Genome Res., 23, 519-529.
13. Minikel, E.V. (2012) How PCR Duplicates Arise in Next-Generation Sequencing. http://www.cureffi.org/2012/12/11/how-pcr-duplicates-arise-in-next- generation-sequencing/.
14. Nik-Zainal, S. et al. (2012) The life history of 21 breast cancers. Cell, 149, 994-1007.
15. Shah, S.P. et al. (2012) The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature, 486, 395-399.
16. Shiroguchi, K. et al. (2012) Digital RNA sequencing minimizes sequence-dependent bias and amplification noise with optimized single-molecule barcodes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 134713-1352.
17. Wagle, N. et al. (2012) High-throughput detection of actionable genomic alterations in clinical tumor samples by targeted, massively parallel sequencing. Cancer Discov., 2, 82-93.