Identification of spatial distributions and uncertainties of multiple heavy metal concentrations by using spatial conditioned Latin Hypercube sampling

Geoderma

Volumn 230-231, Issue , 2014, Pages 9-21

  Lin, Yu Pin ^a   Lin, Wei Chi ^a   Li, Meng Ying ^b   Chen, Yen Yu ^a   Chiang, Li Chi ^c   Wang, Yung Chieh ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b Taiwan GIS Center   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL UNITED UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Conditioned Latin hypercube sampling (cLHS); Experimental variogram; Sequential indicator simulation (SIS); Soil pollution; Spatial sampling

Indexed keywords

HEAVY METALS; OPTIMIZATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS; OPTIMIZATION PROCEDURES; RECONNAISSANCE SURVEYS; SEQUENTIAL INDICATOR SIMULATIONS; SPATIAL SAMPLING; VARIOGRAMS;

COPPER;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CONTAMINATED LAND; HEAVY METAL; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; NUMERICAL MODEL; SAMPLING; SOIL POLLUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; VARIOGRAM;

CHANGHUA; TAIWAN;

EID: 84898870175     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.03.015     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Adriano D., Wenzel W., Vangronsveld J., Bolan N.S. Role of assisted natural remediation in environmental cleanup. Geoderma 2004, 122(2):121-142.
2. Brungard C., Boettinger J. Conditioned Latin hypercube sampling: optimal sample size for digital soil mapping of arid rangelands in Utah, USA. Digital Soil Mapping 2010, 67-75. Springer.
3. Byrnes M.E. Field Sampling Methods for Remedial Investigations 2008, CRC Press.
4. Carré F., McBratney A.B., Minasny B. Estimation and potential improvement of the quality of legacy soil samples for digital soil mapping. Geoderma 2007, 141(1):1-14.
5. Chu H.-J., Lin Y.-P., Jang C.-S., Chang T.-K. Delineating the hazard zone of multiple soil pollutants by multivariate indicator kriging and conditioned Latin hypercube sampling. Geoderma 2010, 158(3):242-251.
6. Cornulier T., Bretagnolle V. Assessing the influence of environmental heterogeneity on bird spacing patterns: a case study with two raptors. Ecography 2006, 29(2):240-250.
7. Cressie N. Statistics for spatial data. Terra Nova 1992, 4(5):613-617.
8. Deutsch C.V., Journel A.G. Geostatistical Software Library and User & Guide, 1996 1992, Oxford University Press, New York.
9. Dixon P.M. Ripley's K function. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics 2006.
10. Falk M.G., Denham R.J., Mengersen K.L. Spatially stratified sampling using auxiliary information for geostatistical mapping. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2011, 18(1):93-108.
11. Fortin M.J., Edwards G. Delineation and analysis of vegetation boundaries. Spatial Uncertainty in Ecology 2001, 158-174.
12. Garau G., Castaldi P., Santona L., Deiana P., Melis P. Influence of red mud, zeolite and lime on heavy metal immobilization, culturable heterotrophic microbial populations and enzyme activities in a contaminated soil. Geoderma 2007, 142(1):47-57.
13. Goovaerts P. Stochastic simulation of categorical variables using a classification algorithm and simulated annealing. Math. Geol. 1996, 28(7):909-921.
14. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation 1997, Oxford University Press.
15. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 1999, 89(1):1-45.
16. Jang C.-S. Probabilistic assessment of safe groundwater utilization in farmed fish ponds of blackfoot disease hyperendemic areas in terms of the regulation of arsenic concentrations. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 392(1):59-68.
17. Juang K.-W., Chen Y.-S., Lee D.-Y. Using sequential indicator simulation to assess the uncertainty of delineating heavy-metal contaminated soils. Environ. Pollut. 2004, 127(2):229-238.
18. Kerry R., Oliver M.A. Variograms of ancillary data to aid sampling for soil surveys. Precis. Agric. 2003, 4(3):261-278.
19. Kerry R., Oliver M. Average variograms to guide soil sampling. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2004, 5(4):307-325.
20. Kerry R., Oliver M. The analysis of ranked observations of soil structure using indicator geostatistics. Geoderma 2007, 140(4):397-416.
21. Kien C.N., Noi N.V., Son L.T., Ngoc H.M., Tanaka S., Nishina T., Iwasaki K. Heavy metal contamination of agricultural soils around a chromite mine in Vietnam. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 2010, 56(2):344-356.
22. Kumar Sarkar S., Frančišković-Bilinski S., Bhattacharya A., Saha M., Bilinski H. Levels of elements in the surficial estuarine sediments of the Hugli River, northeast India and their environmental implications. Environ. Int. 2004, 30(8):1089-1098.
23. Lark R. Optimized spatial sampling of soil for estimation of the variogram by maximum likelihood. Geoderma 2002, 105(1):49-80.
24. Lee J.-J., Jang C.-S., Liu C.-W., Liang C.-P., Wang S.-W. Determining the probability of arsenic in groundwater using a parsimonious model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43(17):6662-6668.
25. Lin Y.-P., Chu H.-J., Wu C.-F., Chang T.-K., Chen C.-Y. Hotspot analysis of spatial environmental pollutants using kernel density estimation and geostatistical techniques. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2010, 8(1):75-88.
26. Lin Y.-P., Cheng B.-Y., Chu H.-J., Chang T.-K., Yu H.-L. Assessing how heavy metal pollution and human activity are related by using logistic regression and kriging methods. Geoderma 2011, 163(3):275-282.
27. Lin Y.-P., Chu H.-J., Huang Y.-L., Cheng B.-Y., Chang T.-K. Modeling spatial uncertainty of heavy metal content in soil by conditional Latin hypercube sampling and geostatistical simulation. Environ. Earth Sci. 2011, 62(2):299-311.
28. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. Comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979, 21(2):239-245.
29. Minasny B., McBratney A.B. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32(9):1378-1388.
30. Minasny B., McBratney A. Conditioned Latin hypercube sampling for calibrating soil sensor data to soil properties. Proximal Soil Sensing 2010, 111-119. Springer.
31. Papritz A., Reichard P. Modelling the risk of Pb and PAH intervention value exceedance in allotment soils by robust logistic regression. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157(7):2019-2022.
32. Pennock D., Yates T., Braidek J. Soil sampling designs. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis 2007, 1-14. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 2nd ed. M.R. Carter, E.G. Gregorich (Eds.).
33. Rawls W.J., Brakensiek D.L., Saxton K.E. Estimation of soil water properties. Trans. ASABE 1982, 25(5):1316-1320.
34. Rehman W., Zeb A., Noor N., Nawaz M. Heavy metal pollution assessment in various industries of Pakistan. Environ. Geol. 2008, 55(2):353-358.
35. Schwartz F.W., Zhang H. Fundamentals of Ground Water 2003.
36. Shomar B. Sources and build up of Zn, Cd, Cr and Pb in the sludge of Gaza. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2009, 155(1-4):51-62.
37. Simbahan G.C., Dobermann A. Sampling optimization based on secondary information and its utilization in soil carbon mapping. Geoderma 2006, 133(3):345-362.
38. Suciu I., Cosma C., Todicǎ M., Bolboacǎ S.D., Jäntschi L. Analysis of soil heavy metal pollution and pattern in central Transylvania. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2008, 9(4):434-453.
39. Twarakavi N.K., Kaluarachchi J.J. Aquifer vulnerability assessment to heavy metals using ordinal logistic regression. Ground Water 2005, 43(2):200-214.
40. Van Meirvenne M., Meklit T. Geostatistical simulation for the assessment of regional soil pollution. Geogr. Anal. 2010, 42(2):121-135.
41. Vašát R., Heuvelink G., Borůvka L. Sampling design optimization for multivariate soil mapping. Geoderma 2010, 155(3):147-153.
42. Wang Q.-R., Cui Y.-S., Liu X.-M., Dong Y.-T., Christie P. Soil contamination and plant uptake of heavy metals at polluted sites in China. J. Environ. Sci. Health A 2003, 38(5):823-838.
43. Wischmeier W., Johnson C., Cross B. Soil Erodibility Nomograph for Farmland and Construction Sites 1971.
44. Zhao Y., Xu X., Huang B., Sun W., Shao X., Shi X., Ruan X. Using robust kriging and sequential Gaussian simulation to delineate the copper-and lead-contaminated areas of a rapidly industrialized city in Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ. Geol. 2007, 52(7):1423-1433.
45. Zhou X., Xia B. Defining and modeling the soil geochemical background of heavy metals from the Hengshi River watershed (southern China): integrating EDA, stochastic simulation and magnetic parameters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 180(1):542-551.
46. Zhuang P., McBride M.B., Xia H., Li N., Li Z. Health risk from heavy metals via consumption of food crops in the vicinity of Dabaoshan mine, South China. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407(5):1551-1561.