Delineating the hazard zone of multiple soil pollutants by multivariate indicator kriging and conditioned Latin hypercube sampling

Geoderma

Volumn 158, Issue 3-4, 2010, Pages 242-251

  Chu, Hone Jay ^a   Lin, Yu Pin ^a   Jang, Cheng Shin ^b   Chang, Tsun Kuo ^a  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b KAINAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Conditioned Latin hypercube sampling; Heavy metal; Multiple variable indicator kriging; Soil contaminant

Indexed keywords

HAZARD ZONES; HAZARDOUS HEAVY METALS; INDICATOR KRIGING; IRRIGATION SYSTEMS; LATIN HYPERCUBE SAMPLING; LONG TERM MONITORING; METAL CONCENTRATIONS; MULTIPLE HAZARDS; MULTIPLE-VARIABLE INDICATOR KRIGING; POLLUTION SOURCES; RANDOM SAMPLING; REGULATORY THRESHOLDS; SAMPLE SIZES; SAMPLING SITE; SAMPLING STRATEGIES; SOIL CONTAMINANT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; STUDY AREAS; TRANSPORT SCHEMES;

CHROMIUM; COPPER; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GEOMETRY; HAZARDS; HEAVY METALS; INDUSTRIAL PLANTS; INTERPOLATION; METALS; PROBABILITY; SAMPLING; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SOILS; ZINC;

SOIL POLLUTION;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HEAVY METAL; KRIGING; LONG-TERM CHANGE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; SAMPLING; SOIL POLLUTION; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

TAIWAN;

EID: 77955768000     PISSN: 00167061     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Amini M. Mapping risk of cadmium and lead contamination to human health in soils of Central Iran. Science of the Total Environment 2005, 347(1-3):64-77.
2. Carre F., McBratney A.B., Minasny B. Estimation and potential improvement of the quality of legacy soil samples for digital soil mapping. Geoderma 2007, 141(1-2):1-14.
3. Deutsch C.V., Journel A.G. GSLIB. Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide 1992, Oxford University Press, New York, 340 pp.
4. Diodato N., Ceccarelli M. Multivariate indicator kriging approach using a GIS to classify soil degradation for Mediterranean agricultural lands. Ecological Indicators 2004, 4(3):177-187.
5. Franco C., Soares A., Delgado J. Geostatistical modelling of heavy metal contamination in the topsoil of Guadiamar river margins (S Spain) using a stochastic simulation technique. Geoderma 2006, 136(3-4):852-864.
6. Goovaerts P. Kriging vs. stochastic simulation for risk analysis in soil contamination. geoENV I-Geostatistics for Environmental Applications 1997, 247-258. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. A. Soares, J. Go'mez-Hern'andez, R. Froidevaux (Eds.).
7. Goovaerts P. Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biology and Fertility of soils 1998, 27(4):315-334.
8. Goovaerts P. Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 1999, 89(1-2):1-45.
9. Goovaerts P. Geostatistical modelling of uncertainty in soil science. Geoderma 2001, 103(1-2):3-26.
10. Goovaerts P., Webster R., Dubois J.P. Assessing the risk of soil contamination in the Swiss Jura using indicator geostatistics. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 1997, 4(1):31-48.
11. GS+ Geostatistics for the Environmental Sciences 2004, Version 5.0. Gamma Design Software, Plainwell, MI.
12. Halvorson J.J., Smith J.L., Papendick R.I. Integration of multiple soil parameters to evaluate soil quality: a field example. Biology and Fertility of Soils 1996, 21(3):207-214.
13. Hassan M.M., Atkins P.J. Arsenic risk mapping in Bangladesh: a simulation technique of cokriging estimation from regional count data. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering 2007, 42(12):1719-1728.
14. Jang C.S., Chen S.K., Ching-Chieh L. Using multiple-variable indicator kriging to assess groundwater quality for irrigation in the aquifers of the Choushui River alluvial fan. Hydrological Processes 2008, 22(2):4477-4489.
15. Jardim E., Ribeiro P.J. Geostatistical assessment of sampling designs for Portuguese bottom trawl surveys. Fisheries Research 2007, 85(3):239-247.
16. Juang K.W., Chen Y.S., Lee D.Y. Using sequential indicator simulation to assess the uncertainty of delineating heavy-metal contaminated soils. Environmental Pollution 2004, 127(2):229-238.
17. Juang K.W., Liao W.J., Liu T.L., Tsui L., Lee D.Y. Additional sampling based on regulation threshold and kriging variance to reduce the probability of false delineation in a contaminated site. Science of the Total Environment 2008, 389(1):20-28.
18. Kasassi A., Rakimbei P., Karagiannidis A., Zabaniotou A., Tsiouvaras K., Nastis A., Tzafeiropoulou K. Soil contamination by heavy metals: measurements from a closed unlined landfill. Bioresource Technology 2008, 99(18):8578-8584.
19. Krishna A.K., Govil P.K. Heavy metal contamination of soil around Pali industrial area, Rajasthan, India. Environmental Geology 2004, 47(1):38-44.
20. Lee J.J., Liu C.W., Jang C.S., et al. Zonal management of multi-purpose use of water from arsenic-affected aquifers by using a multi-variable indicator kriging approach. Journal of Hydrology 2008, 359(3-4):260-273.
21. Lin Y.P. Factorial and indicator kriging methods using a geographic information system to delineate spatial variation and pollution sources of soil heavy metals. Environmental Geology 2002, 42(8):900-909.
22. Lin Y.P. Simulating spatial distributions, variability and uncertainty of soil arsenic by geostatistical simulations in Geographic information systems. Open Environmental Sciences 2008, 2:26-33.
23. Lin Y.P., Chang T.K., Teng T.P. Characterization of soil lead by comparing sequential Gaussian simulation, simulated annealing simulation and kriging methods. Environmental Geology 2001, 41(1):189-199.
24. Lin Y.P., Teng T.P., Chang T.K. Multivariate analysis of soil heavy metal pollution and landscape pattern in Changhua County in Taiwan. Landscape and Urban Planning 2002, 62(1):19-35.
25. Lin Y.P., Chu H.J., Wang C.L., Yu H.H., Wang Y.C. Using remote sensing data with Latin hypercube sampling and geostatistical approach in delineating and sampling landscape changes induced by chronological large-extent physical disturbances. Sensors 2009, 9(1):148-174.
26. Lin Y.P., Cheng B.Y., Shyu G.S., Chang T.K. Combining a finite mixture distribution model with indicator kriging to delineate and map the spatial patterns of soil heavy metal pollution in Chunghua County, central Taiwan. Environmental Pollution 2010, 158(1):235-244.
27. Lin, Y.P., Chu, H.J., Hwang, Y.L., Cheng, B.Y., Chang, T.K., accepted for publication. Modeling spatial uncertainty of heavy metals content in soil by conditional Latin hypercube sampling and geostatistical simulation. Environmental Earth Sciences.
28. McKay M.D., Beckman R.J., Conover W.J. Comparison of 3 methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 1979, 21:239.
29. Metropolis N., Rosenbluth A., Rosenbluth M., Teller A., Teller E. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. Journal of Chemical Physics 1953, 21:1087-1092.
30. Minasny B., McBratney A.B. A conditioned Latin hypercube method for sampling in the presence of ancillary information. Computational Geoscience 2006, 32(9):1378-1388.
31. Norra S., Lanka-Panditha M., Kramar U., Stuben D. Mineralogical and geochemical patterns of urban surface soils, the example of Pforzheim, Germany. Applied Geochemistry 2006, 21:2064-2081.
32. Oyedele D.J., Amusan A.A., Obi A.O. The use of multiple-variable indicator kriging technique for assessment of the suitability of an acid soil for maize. Tropical Agriculture 1996, 73(4):259-263.
33. Post J., Hattermann F.F., Krysanova V., Suckow F. Parameter and input data uncertainty estimation for the assessment of long-term soil organic carbon dynamics. Environmental Modelling & Software 2008, 23:125-138.
34. Schnabel U. Uncertainty assessment for management of soil contaminants with sparse data. Environmental Management 2004, 33(6):911-925.
35. Smith J.L., Halvorson J.J., Papendick R.I. Using multiple-variable indicator kriging for evaluating soil quality. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1993, 57:743-749.
36. Van Meirvenne M., Goovaerts P. Evaluating the probability of exceeding a site-specific soil cadmium contamination threshold. Geoderma 2001, 102(1-2):75-100.
37. Wang X.J., Qi F. The effects of sampling design on spatial structure analysis of contaminated soil. Science of the Total Environment 1998, 224(1-3):29-41.
38. Xu C.G., He H.S., Hu Y.M., Chang Y., Li X.Z., Bu R.C. Latin hypercube sampling and geostatistical modeling of spatial uncertainty in a spatially explicit forest landscape model simulation. Ecological Modelling 2005, 185(2-4):255-269.
39. Zhang C., Wu L., Luo Y., Zhang H., Christie P. Identifying sources of soil inorganic pollutants on a regional scale using a multivariate statistical approach: role of pollutant migration and soil physicochemical properties. Environmental Pollution 2008, 151:470-476.
40. Zhao Y.C., Xu X.H., Huang B., Sun W.X., Shao X.X., Shi X.Z., Ruan X.L. Using robust kriging and sequential Gaussian simulation to delineate the copper- and lead-contaminated areas of a rapidly industrialized city in Yangtze River Delta, China. Environmental Geology 2007, 52(7):1423-1433.
41. Zhao Y., Xu X., Sun W., Huang B., Darilek J.L., Shi X. Uncertainty assessment of mapping mercury contaminated soils of a rapidly industrializing city in the Yangtze River Delta of China using sequential indicator co-simulation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 2008, 138(1-3):343-355.