Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: A population study

BMC Public Health

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Duncan, Amy ^a   Turnbull, Deborah ^a   Wilson, Carlene ^b,c   Osborne, Joanne M ^c,d   Cole, Stephen R ^c,d   Flight, Ingrid ^e   Young, Graeme P ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

^b CANCER COUNCIL SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^c FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d REPATRIATION GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

Adherence; Colorectal cancer; Faecal occult blood test; Psychological factors; Rescreening

Indexed keywords

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SELF EFFICACY; SOUTH AUSTRALIA; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; SELF EFFICACY; SOUTH AUSTRALIA;

EID: 84898840356     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-14-238     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Cochrane systematic review of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal occult blood test (Hemoccult): an update. Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Watson E, Towler B, Irwig L, Am J Gastroenterol 2008 103 1541 1549 10.1111/j.1572-0241. 2008.01875.x 18479499
2. Australian Cancer Network Colorectal Cancer Guidelines Revision Committee, Guidelines for the Prevention, early Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer Sydney: The Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network 2005
3. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation. Young GP, J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 24 33 S42 19799696
4. Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries. Benson VS, Patnick J, Davies AK, Nadel MR, Smith RA, Atkin WS, Int J Cancer 2008 122 1357 1367 18033685
5. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, National Bowel Cancer Screening Program monitoring report: July 2011-June 2012. Cancer series no. 75 Cat. no. CAN 71 Canberra: AIHW 2013
6. A randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer using faecal occult blood testing: results after 13 years and seven biennial screening rounds. Jorgensen OD, Kronborg O, Fenger C, Gut 2002 50 29 32 10.1136/gut.50.1.29 11772963
7. Longitudinal adherence to fecal occult blood testing impacts colorectal cancer screening quality. Gellad ZF, Stechuchak KM, Fisher DA, Olsen MK, McDuffie JR, Ostbye T, Yancy WS, Am J Gastroenterol 2011 106 1125 1134 10.1038/ajg.2011.11 21304501
8. Underuse of colorectal cancer screening in a cohort of medicare beneficiaries. Cooper GS, Doug Kou T, Cancer 2008 112 293 299 10.1002/cncr.23176 18072273
9. Predictors of re-participation in faecal occult blood test- based screening for colorectal cancer. Cole SR, Gregory T, Whibley A, Ward P, Turnbull D, Wilson C, Flight I, Esterman A, Young GP, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2012 13 5989 5994 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.12.5989 23464391
10. Involvement of previous non-participants cannot fully compensate for lower participation in a second round of FIT-screening. Denters MJ, Deutekom M, Bossuyt PM, van Rijn AF, Fockens P, Dekker E, Can Epidemiol 2013 37 330 335 10.1016/j.canep.2013.01.007
11. Patterns of uptake in a biennial faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening programme for colorectal cancer. Steele RJC, McClements PL, Libby G, Carey FA, Fraser CG, Color Dis 2014 16 28 32 10.1111/codi.12393
12. Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior. Kiviniemi MT, Bennett A, Zaiter M, Marshall JR, Psycho-Oncology 2011 20 1023 1033 10.1002/pon.1865 21954045
13. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening behaviors among average-risk older adults in the United States. Beydoun HA, Beydoun MA, Cancer Causes Control 2008 19 339 359 10.1007/s10552-007-9100-y 18085415
14. Systematic review: enhancing the use and quality of colorectal cancer screening. Holden DJ, Jonas DE, Porterfield DS, Reuland D, Harris R, Ann Intern Med 2010 152 668 676 10.7326/0003-4819-152-10-201005180-00239 20388703
15. Using the Transtheoretical Model of Behaviour Change to describe readiness to rescreen for colorectal cancer with faecal occult blood testing. Duncan A, Turnbull D, Gregory T, Cole SR, Young G, Flight I, Wilson C, Health Promot J Aust 2012 23 122 128
16. Repeated screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood test in Catalonia, Spain. Garcia M, Maria Borràs J, Binefa G, Milà N, Alfons Espinàs J, Moreno V, Eur J Cancer Prev 2012 21 42 45 10.1097/CEJ.0b013e32834a7e9b 21849903
17. Longitudinal adherence with fecal occult blood test screening in community practice. Fenton JJ, Elmore JG, Buist DS, Reid RJ, Tancredi DJ, Baldwin L-M, Ann Fam Med 2010 8 397 401 10.1370/afm.1133 20843880
18. Repeat participation in colorectal cancer screening utilizing fecal occult blood testing: a community-based project in a rural setting. Janda M, Hughes KL, Auster JF, Leggett BA, Newman BM, J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010 25 1661 1667 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2010.06405.x 20880176
19. Adherence to repeat fecal occult blood testing in an urban Community Health Center Network. Liss DT, Petit-Homme A, Feinglass J, Buchanan DR, Baker DW, J Community Health 2013 38 829 833 10.1007/s10900-013-9685-x 23546555
20. Prospective study on the determinants of repeat attendance and attendance patterns in breast cancer screening using the theory of planned behaviour. Drossaert CHC, Boer H, Seydel ER, Psychol Health 2003 18 551 565 10.1080/0887044031000141207
21. Comparison of tailored interventions to increase mammography screening in nonadherent older women. Champion V, Maraj M, Hui S, Perkins AJ, Tierney W, Menon U, Skinner CS, Prev Med 2003 36 150 158 10.1016/S0091-7435(02)00038-5 12590989
22. Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: a meta-analytic review. Sohl SJ, Moyer A, Prev Med 2007 45 252 261 10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.06.009 17643481
23. Rozen P, Young G, Levin B, Spann S, Colorectal Cancer in Clinical Practice; Prevention, early Detection and Management London and New York: Taylor & Francis 2 2006
24. Pink B, Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Area's (SEIFA)- Technical Paper (2039.0.55.001) Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics 2004
25. Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer. Gregory T, Wilson C, Duncan A, Turnbull D, Cole SR, Young GP, BMC Public Health 2011 11 38 10.1186/1471-2458-11-38 21232156
26. Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: a longitudinal study on self-regulatory cognitions. Luszczynska A, Schwarzer R, Psychol Health 2003 18 93 108 10.1080/ 0887044021000019358
27. Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales. Wallston KA, Strudler Wallston B, De Vellis R, Health Educ Behav 1978 6 160 170 10.1177/109019817800600107
28. Health as a value: methodological and theoretical considerations. Lau RR, Hartman KA, Health Psychol 1986 5
29. Protection Motivation Theory. Boer H, Seydel ER, Predicting Health Behaviour Buckingham: Open University Press, Conner M, Norman P, 1996 95 120
30. Factorial validity and invariance of a survey measuring psychosocial correlates of colorectal cancer screening among African Americans and Caucasians. Tiro J, Vernon SW, Hyslop T, Myers R, Canc Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005 14 2855 2861 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0217
31. Understanding statistical tests. Neideen T, Brasel K, J Surg Educ 2007 64 93 96 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.02.001 17462209
32. Sociogeographical factors associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening. Le Retraite L, Eisinger F, Loundou A, Rinaldi Y, Seitz JF, Auquier P, Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2010 34 534 540 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.06.007 20832216
33. Socioeconomic determinants for compliance to colorectal cancer screening. A multilevel analysis. Pornet C, Dejardin O, Morlais F, Bouvier V, Launoy G, J Epidemiol Community Health 2010 64 318 324 10.1136/jech.2008.081117 19740776
34. Equity of colorectal cancer screening: cross-sectional analysis of national bowel cancer screening program data for South Australia. Ward PR, Javanparast S, Matt MA, Martini A, Tsourtos G, Cole S, Gill T, Aylward P, Baratiny G, Jiwa M, Misan G, Wilson C, Young G, Aust N Z J Public Health 2011 35 61 65 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00637.x 21299702
35. Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for interventions. Beeker C, Kraft J, Southwell B, Jorgensen C, J Community Health 2000 25 263 278 10.1023/A:1005104406934 10868818
36. Impact of women's experiences during mammography on adherence to rescreening (United States). Peipins L, Shapiro J, Bobo J, Berkowitz Z, Cancer Causes Control 2006 17 439 447 10.1007/s10552-005-0447-7 16596296
37. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence. Tang TS, Patterson SK, Roubidoux MA, Linping D, Psycho-Oncology 2009 18 727 734 10.1002/pon.1463 19035468
38. A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer. Cole SR, Young GP, Esterman A, Cadd B, Morcom J, J Med Screen 2003 10 1 6 10.1258/096914103321610716
39. The view from two sides: a qualitative study of community and medical perspectives on screening for colorectal cancer using FOBT. Clavarino A, Del Mar C, Aitken JF, Janda M, Tong S, Leggett B, Hughes K, Stanton WR, Newman B, Prev Med 2004 39 482 490 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.05.015 15313087
40. A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screenign among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial. Smith S, Trevena L, Simpson J, Barratt A, Nutbeam D, McCaffery K, Br Med J 2010 341 971 981
41. Psychosocial variables associated with colorectal cancer screening in South Australia. Cole SR, Zajac I, Gregory T, Mehaffey S, Roosa N, Turnbull D, Esterman A, Young G, Int J Behav Med 2011 18 302 309 10.1007/s12529-010-9101-1 20496170
42. How well do the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behaviour predict intentions and attendance at screening programmes? A meta-analysis. Cooke R, French DP, Psychol Health 2008 23 745 765 10.1080/08870440701544437
43. Modeling health behaviour change: how to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviours. Schwarzer R, Appl Psychol 2008 57 1 29
44. Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Applied Logistic Regressions New York: John Wiley and Sons 2 2000
45. Self-reported bowel screenign rates in older Australian and the implications for public health screening programs. Zajac I, Flight I, Turnbull D, Young G, Cole S, Wilson C, Australas Med J 2013 6 411 417 10.4066/AMJ.2013.1808 24039635
46. Some methodologic lessons learned from cancer screening research. Vernon SW, Briss PA, Tiro JA, Warnecke RB, Cancer 2004 101 1131 1145 10.1002/cncr.20513 15316907
47. Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Festinger L, Carlsmith JM, J Abnorm Soc Psych 1959 58 203 210
48. How consistently do women report lifetime mammograms at successive interviews? Rauscher GH, O'Malley MS, Earp JAL, Am J Prev Med 2002 22 8 14
49. Measures for ascertaining use of colorectal cancer screening in behavioral, health services, and epidemiologic research. Vernon SW, Meissner H, Klabunde C, Rimer BK, Ahnen DJ, Bastani R, Mandelson MT, Nadel MR, Sheinfeld-Gorin S, Zapka J, Canc Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004 13 898 905