Socioeconomic determinants for compliance to colorectal cancer screening. A multilevel analysis

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 64, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 318-324

  Pornet, C ^a   Dejardin, O ^a   Morlais, F ^a   Bouvier, V ^a   Launoy, G ^a  

^a CAEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE STRUCTURE; CANCER; COHORT ANALYSIS; HEALTH RISK; POPULATION DENSITY; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; SAMPLING;

AGED; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL TUMOR; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; RISK; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FRANCE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

BASSE NORMANDIE; CALVADOS; FRANCE;

EID: 77950291465     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech.2008.081117     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Remontet L, Esteve J, Bouvier AM, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality in France over the period 1978-2000. Rev Epidemiol Santé Publique 2003;51:3-30.
2. NHS Cencer Screening Programme website. The National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme, http://www.cancerscreening.nhs.uk/bowel/screening. html(accessed Aug 2008).
3. U.S. Cencer Statistics Working Group, CDC website. United States Cancer Statistics: 2004 Incidence and Mortality. Atlanta (GA): Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Cancer Institute, 2007. http://Www.cdc.gov/cancer/colorectal/statistlcs/ (accessed 21 Aug 2008).
4. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med 1993;328:1365-1371
5. Hardcasde JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet 1996;348:1472-1477
6. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, et al. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal occult-blood test, Lancet 1996;348:1467-1471
7. Journel Officiel de le République Frençeise n°295 du 21 décembre 2006. Ministère de la santé et des solidarités, page 19240 texte n° 49 Arrêté du 29 septembre 2006 relatif aux programmes de dépistage des cancers, http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affich JO.do?idJO=JORFCONT000000006642 (accessed Aug 2008).
8. Goulard H, Boussac-Zarebska M, Ancelle-Park R, et al. Evaluation épidémiologlque du dépistage du cancer du côlon et du rectum. Premières campagnes du programme pilote français. http://www.lnvs.sante.fr/publlcatlons/2007/cancer-colon-rectum/ cancer-colon-rectum.pdf (accessed 21 Aug 2008).
9. Saite H. Colorectal cancer screening using immunochemical faecal occult blood testing In Japan. J Med Screen 2006;13:(Suppl 1):S6-7.
10. Weller D, Coleman D, Robertson R, et al. The UK colorectal cancer screening pilot: results of the second round of screening in England. Br J Cancer 2007:97: 1601-1605
11. Herbert C, Launoy G, Gignoux M. Factors affecting compliance with colorectal cancer screening in France: differences between intention to participate and actual participation. Eur J Cancer Prev 1997;6:44-52.
12. Ioannou GN, Chapko MK, Dominitz JA. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening participation in the United Sates. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:2082-2091
13. Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, et al. Progress In cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 2003;97:1528-1540
14. Seef LC, Nadel MR, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer test use In the adult U.S. population. Cancer 2004;100:2093-2103
15. Wee CC, McCarthy EP, Phillips RS. Factors associated with colon cancer screening: The role of patient factors and physician counseling. Prev med 2005;41: 23-29
16. Meissner HI, Breen N, Klabunde CN, et al. Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15:389-394
17. McGregor SE, Hilsden RJ, Li FX, et al. Low uptake of colorectal cancer screening 3 yr after release of national recommendations for screening. Am J of Gastroenterol 2007;102:1727-1735
18. Townsend P. Deprivation. J Soc Policy 1987;16:125-146
19. Carstairs V. Deprivation indices: their interpretation and use in relation to health. J Epidemiol Community Health 1995;49(Suppl 2):S3-8.
20. Krieger N, Williams D, Moss N. Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies and guidelines. Annu Rev Public Health 1997;18:341-378
21. Goldstein H. Multilevel statistical models. 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold, 1995. http://cmm.bristol.ac.uk/tearn/HG-Personal/multbook1995. pdf(accessed Aug 2008).
22. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. The random intercept model. In: Multilevel analysis-n introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 1999;38-66.
23. Snijders TAB, Bosker RJ. Testing and model specification. In Multilevel analysis-an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd 1999;86-98.
24. Merlo J, Yang M, Chaix B, et al. A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:729-736
25. Chaix B, Merlo J, Chauvin P. Comparison of a spatial approach with the multilevel approach for investigating place effects on health: The example of healthcare utilisation in France. J Epidemiol Community Health 2005;59:517-526
26. Indices of Deprivetion 2004. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister http://www. communities.gov.uk/communities/neighbourhoodrenewal/deprivation/ (accessed 21 Aug 2008).
27. Zeckrisson S, Lindström M, Moghaddassi M, et al. Social predictors of nonattendance in an urban mammographic screening programme: A multilevel analysis. Scand J Public Health 2007;35:548-554
28. Diez-Roux AV. Bringing context back into epidemiology: variables and fallacies in multilevel analysis. Am J Public Health 1998;88:216-222
29. Guagliardo MF. Spatial accessibility of primary care: concepts, methods and challenges. Int J Health Geogr 2004:3:3. Published online first: 2004 February 26. doi: 10.1186/1476-072X-3-3. http://www.biomedcentral.com/content/ pdf/1476-072X-3-3.pdf. (accessed Aug 2008).
30. Monnat E, Ramée C, Minello A, et al. Socioeconomic context, distance to primary care and detection of hepatitis C: a French population-based study. Soc Sci Med 2008;66:1046-1056
31. Launoy G, Veret JL, Richir B, et al. Involvement of general practitioners In mass screening. Experience of a colorectal cancer mass screening programme in the Calvados region (France). Eur J Cancer Prev 1993;2:229-232
32. Parsons MA, Askland KD. Cancer of the Colorectum in Maine, 1995-1998: determinants of stage at diagnosis in a rural state. J Rural Health 2007;23:25-32.
33. Frederiksen BL, Osier M, Harllng H, et al. Social inequalities In stage at diagnosis of rectal but not in colonic cancer: a nationwide study. Br J Cancer 2008:98:668-673
34. Monnet E, Boutron MC, Faivre J, et al. Influence of socioeconomic status on prognosis of colorectal cancer. A population-based study In Côte D'Or, France. Cancer 1993;72:1165-1170