Minimal access surgical techniques in the management of the painful lumbar motion segment

Spine

Volumn 30, Issue 16 SUPPL., 2005, Pages

  German, John W ^a   Foley, Kevin T ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

^b SEMMES MURPHEY NEUROLOGIC AND SPINE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Lumbar fusion; Minimally invasive surgery; Pedicle screw; Percutaneous

Indexed keywords

MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PAINFUL LUMBAR MOTION SEGMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SOFT TISSUE INJURY; SPINE DISEASE; SPINE FUSION; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT INDICATION;

EID: 23944524809     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000174501.53285.9d     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. Benzel EC. Biomechanics of Spine Stabilization, 2nd ed. Rolling Meadows, IL: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, 2001:483-7.
2. Slosar PJ. Indications and outcomes of reconstructive surgery in chronic pain of spinal origin. Spine 2002;27;2555-62.
3. Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Laursen M, et al. Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion. Spine 2002;27:1269-77.
4. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P, et al. Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques. A prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 2002;27:1131-41.
5. Burkus JK, Transfeldt EE, Kitchel SH, et al. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Spine 2002;27:2396-408.
6. Burkus JK, Heim SE, Gornet MF, et al. Is INFUSE bone graft superior to autograft bone? An integrated analysis of clinical trials using the LT-CAGE lumbar tapered fusion device. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:113-22.
7. Gillet P. The fate of the adjacent motion segments after lumbar fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:338-45.
8. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, et al. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine 2004;29:1938-44.
9. Datta G, Gnanalingham KK, Peterson D, et al. Back pain and disability after lumbar laminectomy: is there a relationship to muscle retraction? Neurosurgery 2004;54:1413-20.
10. Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguchi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance after posterior lumbar surgery. Spine 1997;24:1023-8.
11. Keller A, Brox JI, Gunderson R, et al. Trunk muscle strength, cross sectional area, and density in patients with chronic low back pain randomized to lumbar fusion or cognitive intervention and exercises. Spine 2004;29:3-8.
12. Mayer TG, Vanharanta H, Gatchel RJ. Comparison of CT scan muscle measurements and isokinetic trunk strength in postoperative patients. Spine 1989;14:33-6.
13. Yokoyama T, Okada A, Aburakawa S, et al. Release of the muscle retractors can reduce axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty [Abstr]. Spine J 2003;3:112.
14. Rantanen J, Hurme M, Falck B, et al. The lumbar multifidus muscle five years after surgery for a lumbar intervertebral disc herniation. Spine 1993;18:568-74.
15. Sihvonen T, Herno A, Paljiarvi L, et al. Local denervation atrophy of paraspinal muscles in postoperative failed back syndrome. Spine 1993;18:575-81.
16. Styf JR, Willen J. The effects of external compression by three different retractors on pressure in the erector spine muscles during and after posterior spine surgery in humans. Spine 1998;23:354-8.
17. Delamarter RB, Fribourg DM, Kanim LEA, et al. ProDisc artificial total lumbar disc replacement: introduction and early results from the United States clinical trial. Spine 2003;28(suppl):167-75.
18. Hochschuler SH, Ohnmeiss DD, Guyer RD, et al. Artificial disc: preliminary results of a prospective study in the United States. Eur Spine J 2002;11 (suppl 2):106-10.
19. McAfee PC, Fedder IL, Saiedy S, et al. Experimental design of total disk replacement: experience with a prospective randomized study of the SB Charité. Spine 2003;20(suppl):153-62.
20. Zigler JE, Burd TA, Vialle EN, et al. Early results using the ProDisc II: a prospective randomized trial of arthroplasty versus fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:352-61.
21. Bertagnoli R, Kumar S. Indications for full prosthetic disc arthroplasty: a correlation of clinical outcome against a variety of indications. Eur Spine J 2002;11(suppl 2):131-6.
22. van Ooij A, Curnhur Oner F, Verbout AJ. Complications of artificial disc replacement: a report of 27 patients with the SB Charité disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 2003;16:369-83.
23. Bosch F, Wehrman U, Saeger HD, et al. Laparoscopic or conventional cholecystectomy: clinical and economic considerations. Eur J Surg 2002;168:270-7.
24. Topcu O, Karakayali F, Kuza MA, et al. Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003;17:291-5.
25. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Jonsson D, et al. Cost-effectiveness of lumbar fusion and nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain in the Swedish lumbar spine study: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 2004;29:421-34.
26. Kuntz KM, Snider RK, Weinstein JN, et al. Cost-effectiveness of fusion with and without instrumentation for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis. Spine 2000;25:1132-9.
27. Whitecloud TS, Roesch WW, Ricciardi JE. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis. J Spinal Disord 2001;14:100-3.
28. Gejo R, Kawaguchi Y, Kondoh T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and histologic evidence of postoperative back muscle injury in rats. Spine 2000;25:941-6.
29. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: a histologic and enzymatic analysis. Spine 1996;21:941-4.
30. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Part 2. A histologic and histochemical analyses in humans. Spine 1994;19:2598-602.
31. Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery: topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine 1996;21:2683-8.
32. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine 1997;22:1018-23.
33. Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Gejo R, et al. Preventive measures of back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery in rats. Spine 1998;23:2282-7.
34. Nagayama R, Nakamura H, Yamano Y, et al. An experimental study of the effects of nerve root retraction on the posterior ramus. Spine 2000;25:418-24.
35. Taylor H, McGregor AH, Medhi-Zadeh S, et al. The impact of self-retaining retractors on the paraspinal muscles during posterior spinal surgery. Spine 2002;27:2758-62.
36. Adamson TE. Microendoscopic posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy for unilateral radiculopathy: results of a new technique in 100 cases. J Neurosurg Spine 2001;95:51-7.
37. Adamson TE. The impact of minimally invasive cervical spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:43-6.
38. Foley KT, Smith M. Microendoscopic discectomy. Tech Neurosurg 1997;3:301-7.
39. Palmer S, Turner R, Palmer R. Bilateral decompression of lumbar stenosis involving a unilateral approach with microscope and tubular retractor system. J Neurosurg Spine 2002;97:213-7.
40. Schwender JD, Holly LT, Rouben DP, et al. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2005;18(suppl 1):1-6.
41. Foley KT, Gupta SK. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation of the lumbar spine: preliminary clinical results. J Neurosurg Spine 2002;97:7-12.
42. Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 2003;28(suppl):26-35.
43. Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA. Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 2002;49:499-517.
44. Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, et al. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine 2000;25:2637-45.
45. Holly LT, Foley KT. Intraoperative spinal navigation. Spine 2003;28:54-61.
46. Möller H, Hedlund R. Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis: a prospective randomized study: Part 2. Spine 2000;25:1716-21.
47. Rengachary SS. Bone morphogenetic proteins: basic concepts. Neurosurg Focus [serial online]. 2002;13:Article 2. Available from: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Rolling Meadows, IL.
48. Walker DH, Wright NM. Bone morphogenetic proteins and spinal fusion. Neurosurg Focus [serial online]. 2002;13:Article 3. Available from: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Rolling Meadows, IL.
49. Ackerman SJ, Malfilios MS, Polly DW. Economic evaluation of bone morphogenetic protein versus autogenous iliac crest bone graft in single-level anterior lumbar fusion. Spine 2002;27(suppl):94-9.
50. Mummaneni PV, Pan J, Haid RW, et al. Contribution of recombinant human morphogenetic protein-2 to the rapid creation of interbody fusion when used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary report. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:19-23.
51. Boden SD, Kang J, Sanhu H, et al. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to achieve posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in humans. Spine 2002;27:2662-73.
52. Johnsson R, Strömqvist B, Aspenberg P. Randomized radiostereometric study comparing osteogenic protein-1 (BMP-7) and autograft bone in human noninstrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Spine 2002;27:2654-61,
53. Vaccaro AR, Patel T, Fischgrund J, et al. A pilot study evaluating the safety and efficacy of OP-1 putty (rhBMP-7) as replacement for iliac crest autograft in posterolateral lumbar arthrodesis for degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 2004;29:1885-92.
54. La Rosa G, Conti A, Cacciola F, et al. Pedicle screw fixation for isthmic spondylolisthesis: does posterior lumbar interbody fusion improve outcome over posterolateral fusion? J Neurosurg Spine 2003;99:143-50.
55. Watkins MB. Posterior fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1953;35:1014-8.
56. Foley KT, Smith MM, Rampersaud YR. Microendoscopic approach to far lateral lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus [serial online]. 1999;7: Article 5. Available from: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Rolling Meadows, IL.
57. Cloward RB. The treatment of ruptured intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion: indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg 1953;10:154-68.
58. Enker P, Steffee AD. Interbody fusion and instrumentation. Clin Orthop 1994;300:90-101.
59. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. J Neurosurg Spine 2004;1:24-30.
60. Harms J, Rolinger H. A one stage procedure in operative treatment of spondylolisthesis: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion [in German]. Z Orthop 1982;120:343-7.
61. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine 2001;26:567-71.
62. Lowe TG, Tahernia AD, O'Brien MF, et al. Unilateral transforaminal posterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): indications, technique, and 2-year results. J Spinal Disord Tech 2002;15:31-8.
63. Salerni AA. A minimally invasive approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus [serial online]. 2002;13:Article 6. Available from: American Association of Neurological Surgeons, Rolling Meadows, IL.
64. Schwender J, Foley K, Rouben D, et al. Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): successful clinical and radiographic outcomes at two year follow-up. Spine J 2004;4(suppl 5):94-5.