Improvement of mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of agri-food waste by addition of glycerol

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 140, Issue , 2014, Pages 76-82

  Serrano, Antonio ^a   Siles, Jose A ^a   Chica, Arturo F ^a   Martin, M Angeles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÓRDOBA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Crude glycerol; Economic assessment; Fish waste; Kinetics; Mesophilic anaerobic co digestion; Strawberry waste

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIODEGRADABILITY; FISH; FRUITS; METHANE; WASTE INCINERATION;

AGRI-FOOD WASTES; ANAEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; CRUDE GLYCEROL; ECONOMIC ASSESSMENTS; FISH WASTES; MESOPHILIC; MESOPHILIC ANEROBIC CO-DIGESTION; METHANE YIELD; STRAWBERRY WASTE; TOTAL VOLATILE SOLIDS;

GLYCEROL;

BIODIESEL; GLYCEROL; METHANE; INDUSTRIAL WASTE;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIODEGRADATION; BIOFUEL; COMPOSTING; DOMESTIC WASTE; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; HYDROLYSIS; INCINERATION; LANDFILL; METHANE; OPTIMIZATION; REACTION KINETICS; SOLID WASTE; WASTE DISPOSAL;

ACCLIMATIZATION; AGRICULTURAL WASTE; ALKALINITY; ANAEROBIC CO DIGESTION; ARTICLE; BIODEGRADABILITY; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; ENERGY YIELD; FREEZING; MOISTURE; PH; SOLID WASTE; SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT; STRAWBERRY; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ANIMAL; BIOREACTOR; FISH; FOOD INDUSTRY; FOOD PRESERVATION; FRAGARIA; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ANAEROBIOSIS; ANIMALS; BIOREACTORS; FISHES; FOOD PRESERVATION; FOOD-PROCESSING INDUSTRY; FRAGARIA; GLYCEROL; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; METHANE; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84898670946     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.02.028     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Angelidaki I., Schmidt J.E., Karakashev D.B. ASustainable Solution for Pig Manure Treatment: Environmental Compliance with the Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Directive 2006, Contract COOP-CT-2005-017641.
2. APHA Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1989, APHA, AWWA & WPCF.
3. Brunetti A., Boari G., Passino R., Rozzi A. Physico-chemical factors affecting start-up in UASB digestors. Proc. of European Symposium on Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment, Noordwijkerhout, The Netherlands 1983, 317.
4. Bustamante M.A., Alburquerque J.A., Restrepo A.P., de la Fuente C., Paredes C., Moral R., Bernal M.P. Co-composting of the solid fraction of anaerobic digestates, to obtain added-value materials for use in agriculture. Biomass Bioenerg. 2012, 43:26-35.
5. Cheng F., Boe K., Angelidaki I. Anaerobic co-digestion of by-products from sugar productions with cow manure. Water Res. 2011, 45:3473-3480.
6. Eder B., Schulz H. Biogas Praxis - Grundlagen, Planung, Anlagenbau, Beispiele, Wirtschaftlichkeit 2007, Ökobuch Verlag, Staufen.
7. Eiroa M., Costa J.C., Alves M.M., Kennes C., Veiga M.C. Evaluation of the biomethane potential of solid fish waste. Waste Manag. 2012, 32:1347-1352.
8. EUROSTAT (accessed 10.11.13). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Electricity_and_natural_gas_price_statistics.
9. Evans J.M., Wilkie A.C. Life cycle assessment of nutrient remediation and bioenergy production potential from the harvest of hydrilla (Hydrilla verticillata). J.Environ. Manag. 2010, 91:2626-2631.
10. FAOSTAT (accessed 03.14.13). http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor.
11. Fernandez R. Study of Biodegradability of Different Wastes with Strategic Value in the Zone of Huelva 2011, Certificate of Advanced Studies in Chemical Engineering, University of Cordoba, Spain.
12. Fischer C., Lehner M., McKinnon D.L. Overview of the Use of Landfill Taxes in Europe 2012, ETC/SCP Working Paper 1/2012.
13. Fountoulakis M.S., Petousi I., Manios T. Co-digestion of sewage sludge with glycerol to boost biogas production. Waste Manag. 2010, 30:1849-1853.
14. Goerten J. Eurostat New Release 2013, 79. Eurostat Press Office. L. Corselli-Nordblad (Ed.).
15. Gómez X., Cuetos M.J., Cara J., Morán A., García A.I. Anaerobic co-digestion of primary sludge and the fruit and vegetable fraction of the municipal solid wastes: conditions for mixing and evaluation of the organic loading rate. Renew. Energy 2006, 31:2017-2024.
16. Hazimah A.H., Ooi T.L., Salmiah A. Recovery of glycerol and diglycerol from glycerol pitch. J.Oil Palm Res. 2003, 15:1-5.
17. Iglesias D. Costos económicos por la generación y manejo de residuos sólidos en el municipio de Toluca, Estado de México. Equilibr. Econ. 2007, 3:131-148.
18. Koroneos C.J., Nanaki E.A. Integrated solid waste management and energy production - a life cycle assessment approach: the case study of the city of Thessaloniki. J.Clean. Prod. 2012, 27:141-150.
19. Lane G. Laboratory-scale anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable solid waste. Biomass 1984, 5:245-259.
20. Liu C.F., Yuan X.Z., Zeng G.M., Li W.M., Li J. Prediction of methane yield at optimum pH for anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Bioresource Technol. 2008, 99:882-888.
21. Ma J., Van Wambeke M., Carballa M., Verstraete W. Improvement of the anaerobic treatment of potato processing wastewater in a UASB reactor by co-digestion with glycerol. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 30:861-867.
22. Ortega L., Husser C., Barrington S., Guiot S.R. Evaluating limiting steps of anaerobic degradation of food waste based on methane production test. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57:419-422.
23. Pollard S.J.T., Smith R., Longhurst P.J., Eduljee G.H., Hall D. Recent developments in the application of risk analysis to waste technologies. Environ. Int. 2006, 32:1010-1020.
24. Rathi S. Optimization model for integrated municipal solid waste management in Mumbai, India. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2007, 12:105-121.
25. Regueiro L., Carballa M., Álvarez J.A., Lema J.M. Enhanced methane production from pig manure anaerobic digestion using fish and biodiesel wastes as co-substrates. Bioresource Technol. 2012, 123:507-513.
26. Rentizelas A.A., Tolis A.I., Tatsiopoulos I.P. Combined municipal solid waste and biomass system optimization for district energy applications. Waste Manage. 2014, 34:36-48.
27. Serrano A., Siles J.A., Chica A.F., Martín M.A. Agri-food waste valorization through anaerobic co-digestion: fish and strawberry residues. J.Clean. Prod. 2013, 54:125-132.
28. Siles J.A., Martín M.A., Chica A.F., Martín A. Anaerobic digestion of glycerol derived from biodiesel manufacturing. Bioresource Technol. 2009, 100:5609-5615.
29. Siles J.A., Serrano A., Martín A., Martín M.A. Biomethanization of waste derived from strawberry processing: advantages of pretreatment. J.Clean. Prod. 2013, 42:190-197.
30. Tanskanen J.H. Strategic planning of municipal solid waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2000, 30:111-133.
31. Teghammar A., Castillo M.D.P., Ascue J., Niklasson C., Sárvári Horváth I. Improved anaerobic digestion by the addition of paper tube residuals: pretreatment, stabilizing, and synergetic effects. Energ. Fuel 2013, 27:277-284.
32. Thaveesri J. Granulation and Stability in Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Bed Reactors in Relation to Substrates and Liquid Surface Tension 1995, (Ph.D. thesis), Ghent University, Belgium.
33. Torfs R., Van Der Linden A., Rabl A., Zoughaib A., Taylor T., Arnold S., Diakoulaki D., Holland M. SusTools Project 2004, CONTRACT N°: EVG3-CT-2002-80010. EESD Programme (1998-2002).
34. US Composting Council Test Methods for the Examination of Composting and Compost 2001.
35. Van Assche P., Poels J., Verstraete W. Anaerobic digestion of pig manure with cellulose as co-substrate. Biotechnol. Lett. 1983, 5:749-754.
36. Weng Y.C., Fujiwara T. Examining the effectiveness of municipal solid waste management systems: an integrated cost-benefit analysis perspective with a financial cost modeling in Taiwan. Waste Manag. 2011, 31:1393-1406.
37. Wheatley A. Anaerobic Digestion: a Waste Treatment Technology 1990, Elsevier Press, London, U.K.
38. Zeng X., Ma Y., Ma L. Utilization of straw in biomass energy in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2007, 11:976-987.