Ecological Risk Assessment of Provincial Land-Use Overall Planning in China

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1491-1506

  Zhao, Yuan ^a,b   Huang, Cheng Min ^a   Zhang, Hong Ji ^b  

^a SICHUAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Sichuan Provincial Natural Resources Research Institute   (China)

Author keywords

ecological risk; evaluation method; provincial land use overall planning; Sichuan Province

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898659195     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: 15497860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807039.2013.867773     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Alexander DE. 1991. Natural disasters: A framework for research and teaching. Disasters 15(3):209-26
2. Alexandrov GA, Oikawa T, and Yamagata Y. 2002. The scheme for globalization of a process-based model explaining gradations in terrestrial NPP and its application. Ecol Modeling 148(3):293-306
3. Bayliss P, van Dam RA, and Bartolo RE. 2012. Quantitative ecological risk assessment of the Magela Creek Floodplain in Kakadu National Park, Australia: Comparing point source risks from the ranger uranium mine to diffuse landscape-scale risks. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 18:115-51
4. Christou M, Gyenes Z, and Struckl M. 2011. Risk assessment in support to land-use planning in Europe: Towards more consistent decisions? J Loss Prevent Proc 24:219-26
5. Costanza R, Arge R, Groot R, et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 386:253-9
6. Domene X, Ramirez W, Mattana S, et al. 2008. Ecological risk assessment of organic waste amendments using the species sensitivity distribution from a soil organisms test battery. Environ Pollut 155:227-36
7. Gramer W, Kicklighter DW, Bondeau A, et al. 1999. Comparing global models of terrestrial net primary productivity (NPP): Overview and key results. Global Change Biol 5(SUPPL.):1-15
8. Hanson ML and Solomon KR. 2004. Halo acetic acids in the aquatic environment Part II: Ecological risk assessment. Environ Pollut 130:385-401
9. Hayes EH and Landis WG. 2004. Regional risk assessment of a near shore marine environment Cherry Point, WA. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:299-325
10. Huang NS and Kuang YQ. 2000. The carrying capacity of resources and the problems of sustainable development in Guangdong Province. Economic Geography 20(2):52-6
11. Landis WG. 2003. The frontier in ecological risk assessment at expanding spatial and temporal scales. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9:1415-24
12. Landis WG and Weigers JA. 1997. Design considerations and a suggested approach for regional and comparative ecological risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 3:287-97
13. La Rosa D and Martinico F. 2012. Assessment of hazards and risks for landscape protection planning in Sicily. J Environ Manage 7:1-13
14. Li GP and Liu DX. 1995. A method of grey topology for climatic forecast of temperature and rainfall. Plateau Meteorology 14(2):207-11
15. Li M and Zhang HY. 2003. Provincial difference in cultivated land and grain productivity in China. Resources Sci 25(3):49-56
16. Liu Y, Xing YG, and Li JC. 2012. Theoretical basis and model development for land ecological risk assessment. China Land Sci 26(6):20-5
17. Luo DQ, Luo GL, Zhang XC, et al. 2005. Analysis on ecological risk of land utilization planning. Ecol Planning 10:221-4
18. Metzger MJ, Rounsevell MDA, Acosta-Michlik L, et al. 2006. The vulnerability of ecosystem services to land use change. Agr Ecosyst Environ 114:69-85
19. Moraes R, Landis WG, and Molander S. 2002. Regional risk assessment of a Brazilian Rain Forest. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:1779-803
20. Neff JM, Johnsen S, Frost TK, et al. 2006. Oil well produced water discharges to the North Sea. Part II: Comparison of deployed mussels (Mytilus edulis) and the DREAM model to predict ecological risk. Mar Environ Res 62:224-46
21. Niroula GS and Thapa GB. 2005. Impacts and causes of land soil development. Folia Geobot 4(2):132-64
22. O'laughlin J. 2005. Policies for risk assessment in federal land and resource management decisions. Forest Ecol and Manag 211:15-27
23. Panizza M. 1996. Environmental Geomorphology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
24. Pearsons TN, Murdoch AR, Mackey G, et al. 2012. Ecological risk assessment of multiple hatchery programs in the upper Columbia watershed using Delphi and modeling approaches. Environ Biol Fishes 94:87-100
25. Pittock AB and Nix HA. 1986. The effect of changing climate on Australian biomass production-A preliminary study. Climatic Change 8:243-55
26. Pu JG and Kang L. 2003. Application of gray prediction model GM (2,1) in temperature and rainfall. Sichuan Meteorology 23(3):10-2
27. Ran SH, Lu CH, Jia KJ, et al. 2006. Environmental impact assessment of the land use change in China based on ecosystem service value. Environ Sci 27(10):2139-44
28. Reidsma P, Tekelenburg T, van den Berg M, et al. 2006. Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: Assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union. Agr Ecosyst Environ 114:86-102
29. Ruimy A and Saugier B. 1994. Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. J Geophys Res 99:5263-83
30. Sang Q, Zhang PY, and Han F. 2007. Study on relative resources carrying capacity and sustainable development in west Liaoning. J Arid Land Resources Environ 21(12):21-6
31. Shinneman DJ, Palik BJ, and Cornett MW. 2012. Can landscape-level ecological restoration influence fire risk? A spatially-explicit assessment of a northern temperate-southern boreal forest landscape. For Ecol Manage 274:126-35
32. Sun Q, Cai YL, and Wang L. 2007. Land use based ecological assessment of green space: A case study of Tongzhou District of Beijing. China Land Sci 21(1):36-42
33. Tan YZ and Wu CF. 2003. The laws of the information entropy values of land use composition. J Nat Resources 18(1):112-7
34. Taveau J. 2010. Risk assessment and land-use planning regulations in France following the AZF disaster. J Loss Prevent Proc 23:813-23
35. Theobald MD, Miller JR, and Hobbs NT. 1997. Estimating the accumulative effects of development on wildlife habitat. Landscape Urban Plan 39(1):25-36
36. UNDHA (UN Department of Humanitarian Affairs). 1991. Mitigating Natural Disasters: Phenomena, Effects and Options-A Manual for Policy Makers and Planners. New York, NY, USA
37. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. Washington, DC, USA
38. USEPA. 2002. Ecological Risk Assessment for the Middle Snake River, Idaho. EPA/600/R-01/017. Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, USA
39. Victor B. 2002. Applying ecological risk principles to watershed assessment and management. Environ Manage 29:145-54
40. Wang ZM and Liang YL. 2002. Progress in vegetation NPP model research. Agricult Res Arid Areas 20(2):104-7
41. Whitehouse RJ. 1998. Planning application tool-A risk assessment tool for non-specialists. J Hazard Mater 61:375-80
42. Xie GD, Lu CX, Leng YF, et al. 2003. Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan plateau. J Nat Resources 18(2):189-96
43. Yan HM, Liu JY, and Cao MK. 2007. Spatial pattern and topographic control of China's agricultural productivity variability. Acta Geographica Sinica 62(2):171-80
44. Yan SJ, Hong W, Wu CZ, et al. 2001. Modification of natural vegetation NPP model. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis 23(2):248-52
45. Yang WR, Wang RS, Huang JL, et al. 2007. Ecological risk assessment and its research progress. Chinese J Appl Ecol 18(8):1869-76
46. Yu GM, Feng J, Che Y, et al. 2010. The identification and assessment of ecological risks for land consolidation based on the anticipation of ecosystem stabilization: A case study in Hubei Province, China. Land Use Policy 27:293-303
47. Zhou JM and Peng WF. 2005. The grey correlation analysis of factors affecting grain production and the forecast for grain production in Sichuan Province. J Sichuan Normal University (Natural Science) 28(3):27-30
48. Zhou SJ and Griffiths SP. 2008. Sustainability assessment for fishing effects (SAFE): A new quantitative ecological risk assessment method and its application to elasmobranch by catch in an Australian trawl fishery. Fish Res 91:56-68