Regional ecological risk assessment of a near shore marine environment: Cherry Point, WA

Human and Ecological Risk Assessment

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 299-325

  Hayes, Emily Hart ^a   Landis, Wayne G ^a  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cherry Point; Marine risk assessment; Multiple stressors; Regional risk assessment; Relative risk model; WA

Indexed keywords

TRIXIS;

EID: 4544345771     PISSN: 10807039     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10807030490438256     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams SM, Bevelhimer MS, Greeley MS Jr. et al. 1999. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 6: Bioindicators of fish population health. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:628-40
2. Alexander RR, Standon RJ Jr, and Dodd JR. 1993. Influence of sediment grain size on the burrowing of bivalves: Correlation with distribution and stratigraphic persistence of selected neogene clams. Palaios 8:289-303
3. Bargmann G, Marshall R, and Piening C. 2001. The decline of herring at Cherry Point, Washington. Proceedings, Puget Sound Research 2001, Bellevue, WA, February 12-14
4. Baron LA, Sample BE, and Suter GW II. 1999. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 5. Aerial insectivorous wildlife. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:621-7
5. Chen, J. 2002. Regional Risk Assessment for the Squalicum Creek Watershed. Master of Science Thesis. Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA, USA
6. Collins G, Kremer JN, and Valiela I. 2000. Assessing uncertainty in estimates of nitrogen loading to estuaries for research, planning, and risk assessment. Environ Management 25:635-45
7. Cook RB, Suter GW II, and Sain ER. 1999. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 1. introduction and background. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:581-8
8. Cormier SM, Smith M, Norton S, et al. 2000. Assessing ecological risk in watersheds: A case study of problem formulation in the Big Darby Creek watershed, Ohio, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1082-96
9. EVS Environmental Consultants. 1999. Cherry Point Screening Level Ecological Risk Assessment. Prepared for Washington Department of Natural Resources, Aquatic Resources Division, Olympia, WA, USA
10. Gunderson DR, Armstrong DA, Shi Y, et al. 1990. Patterns of estuarine use by juvenile English sole (Parophrys vetulus) and Dungeness crab (Cancer magister). Estuaries 13:59-71
11. Halbrook RS, Aulerich RJ, Bursian SJ, et al. 1999. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir 8: Experimental study of the effects of polychlorinated biphenyls on reproductive success in mink. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:649-54
12. Hunsaker CT, Grahm RL, Suter GW, et al. 1990. Assessing ecological risk on a regional scale. Environmental Management 14:325-32
13. Johnson RK, Munns WR, Tyler, PL, et al. 2002. Weighing the evidence of ecological risk from chemical contamination in the estuarine environment adjacent to the Portsmouth naval shipyard, Kittery, Maine, USA. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:182-94
14. Jones DS, Barnthouse LW, Suter GW II, et al. 1999. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 3. benthic macroinvertebrates. Envrion Toxicol Chem 18:599-609
15. Kyte MA. 2001. Observations from a qualitative examination of the intertidal zone of the Cherry Point reach June 22-24, 2001. Golder Associates Inc., Bellevue, WA, USA
16. Landis WG and Wiegers JA. 1997. Design considerations and a suggested approach for regional and comparative ecological risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 3:287-97
17. Landis WG, Luxon M, and Bodensteiner LR. 2000. Design of a relative risk model regional-scale risk assessment with confirmational sampling for the Willamette and McKenzie Rivers, Oregon. In: Price FT, Brix KV, and Lane NK (eds), Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment: Recent Achievements in Environmental Fate and Transport: Ninth Volume, ASTM STP 1381, pp 67-88. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
18. Landis WG, Markiewicz AJ, Thomas J, et al. 2001. Regional risk assessment predictions for the decline and future management of the Cherry Point herring stock. Proceedings, Puget Sound Research 2001, Bellevue, WA, February 12-14
19. MacDonald K, Simpson D, Paulson B, et al. 1994. Shoreline armoring effects on physical coastal processes in Puget Sound, Washington. Coastal Erosion Management Studies, Volume 5. Report 94-78. Washington Department of Natural Resources, Shoreland and Water Resources Program, Olympia, WA, USA
20. McMillan RO. 1991. Abundance, settlement, Growth and Habitat Use by Juvenile Dungeness Crab, Cancer magister, in Inland Waters of Northern Puget Sound, Washington. Master of Science Thesis. University of Washington. Seattle, WA, USA
21. Moraes R, Landis WG, and Molander S. 2002. Regional risk assessment of a Brazilian rain forest reserve. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:1779-803
22. NOS (National Ocean Service). 2001. National Geophysical Data Center GEODAS NOS Hydrographic Surveys [computer file], Vol. 1 Version 4.1
23. Obery AM and Landis WG. 2002. A regional multiple stressor risk assessment of the Codorus Creek watershed applying the relative risk model. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:405-28
24. O'Neill RV, Hunsaker CT, Jones KB, et al. 1997. Monitoring environmental quality at the landscape scale. BioScience 47:513-9
25. Pauley GB, Armstrong DA, and Heun TW. 1986. Species profiles: Life histories and environmental requirements of coastal fishes and invertebrates (Pacific Northwest) - Dungeness crab. TR EL-82-4. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Report 82(11.63). U.S. Army Corp or Engineers
26. Rugen P and Callahan B. 1996. An overview of Monte Carlo, a fifty year perspective. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 2:671-80
27. Sample BE and Suter GW II. 1999. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 4. piscivorous wildlife. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:610-20
28. Schubauer-Berigan MK, Smith M, Hopkins J, et al. 2000. Using historical biological data to evaluate status and trends in the Big Darby Creek watershed (Ohio, USA). Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1097-105
29. Simenstad CA, Tanner CD, Thom RM, et al. 1991. Estuarine habitat assessment protocol. EPA 910/9-91-037. USEPA Region 10, Office of Puget Sound. Seattle, WA, USA
30. Suter GW II. 1990. Endpoints for regional ecological risk assessments. Environ Management 14:9-23
31. Suter GW (ed). 1993. Ecological Risk Assessment. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, MI, USA
32. Suter GW II, Barnthouse LW, Efroymson RA, et al. 1999. Ecological risk assessment in a large river-reservoir: 2. Fish community. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:589-98
33. Thom RM and Shreffler DK. 1994. Shoreline Armoring Effects on Coastal Ecology and Biological Resources in Puget Sound, Washington. Coastal Erosion Management Studies, Volume 7. Report 94-80. Washington Department of Ecology, Shoreland and Water Resources Program, Olympia, WA, USA
34. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 2001. Better Assessment Science Integrating Point and Nonpoint Sources [CD ROM]. EPA-823-C-01-010. Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA
35. USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA/360/R-95/002F. Washington, DC, USA
36. USGS (US Geological Survey). 1987. Digital Line Graph of Bellingham, Wash. [computer file]. Using: USGS Bellingham, Wash. (map) 1:100,000. 30-minute series. Reston, VA: USGS, 1975
37. Valiela I, Tomasky G, Hauxwell J, et al. 2000. Operationalizing sustainability: Management and risk assessment of land-derived nitrogen loads to estuaries. Ecol Applications 10:1006-23
38. Walker R, Landis WG, and Brown P. 2001. Developing a regional ecological risk assessment: A case study of a Tasmanian agricultural catchment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7:417-39
39. Warren-Hicks MJ and Moore DRJ. 1998. Uncertainty analysis in ecological risk assessment. Proceedings from the Pellston workshop on uncertainty in ecological risk assessment, 23-28 August 1995, Pellston, Michigan. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC). Pensacola, FL, USA
40. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 1999. Great Blue Heron Densities from the Puget Sound Ambient Monitoring Program Summer Aerial Counts 1992-1999 (map). Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA, USA
41. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2001a. Aerial observations of recreational clam and pacific oyster harvest on Puget Sound public beaches from January 1 through December 31, 2001. [computer file] Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA, USA
42. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2001b. 2001 Surf smelt spawning areas [computer file]. Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Olympia, WA, USA
43. WDFW (Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2002. Priority Habitats and Species List. Available at http://www.wa.gov/wdfw/hab/phslist.htm
44. WDNR (Washington Department of Natural Resources). 1997a. Shorezone Inventory. Near Shore Habitat Program [computer file]. Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, USA
45. WDNR (Washington Department of Natural Resources). 1997b. Puget Sound Intertidal Habitat Inventory 1995 [CD-ROM]. Washington State Department of Natural Resources Nearshore Habitat Program, Aquatic Resources Division, Olympia, WA, USA
46. WDNR (Washington Department of Natural Resources). 2001a. DNR Aquatic Mission. Available at http://www.wa.gov/dnr/htdocs/aqr/
47. WDNR (Washington Department of Natural Resources). 2001b. Cherry Point Reserve Boundaries [computer file]. Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA, USA
48. WDOE (Washington Department of Ecology). 1999. Sediment Quality in Puget Sound, Year 1 - Northern Puget Sound, December 1999. Publication No. 99-347. Washington State Department of Ecology Environmental Assessment Program, Environmental Monitoring and Trends Section, Olympia, WA, USA
49. Whatcom County Assessor. 2000. 2000 tax parcels [computer file]. Whatcom County Assessor, Bellingham, WA, USA
50. Whatcom County Planning and Development Services. 1998. Buffered Wetlands [computer file]. Using: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services National Wetlands Inventory. Whatcom County Planning and Development Services, Bellingham, WA, USA
51. Whatcom County PUD (Public Utility District). 2000. Land use parcels for Lummi Nation Indian Reservation [computer file]. Whatcom County Public Utility District, Lynden, Washington, USA
52. Whatcom County Planning and Development Services. 2001. Water Resource Inventory Area 1 Watershed boundaries [computer file]. Whatcom County Planning and Development Services, Bellingham, WA, USA
53. Wiegers JK, Feder HM, Mortensen LS, et al. 1998. A regional multiple-stressor rank-based ecological risk assessment for the fjord of Port Valdez, Alaska. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 4:1125-73