Functional and effective connectivity of stopping

NeuroImage

Volumn 94, Issue , 2014, Pages 120-128

  Huster, René J ^a   Plis, Sergey M ^b   Lavallee, Christina F ^a   Calhoun, Vince D ^b,c   Herrmann, Christoph S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^b MIND RESEARCH NETWORK   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO   (United States)

Author keywords

Connectivity; Delta; Inhibition; N200; P300; Stop signal task; Stopping; Theta

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BEHAVIOR; BEHAVIORAL INHIBITION; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELTA RHYTHM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDEPENDENT COMPONENT ANALYSIS; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SIGNAL DETECTION; STOPPING BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE; THETA RHYTHM; ADULT; BRAIN; CONNECTOME; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN WAVES; CONNECTOME; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; NERVE NET; NEURAL INHIBITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84898640623     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.034     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Alegre M., Alvarez-Gerriko I., Valencia M., Iriarte J., Artieda J. Oscillatory changes related to the forced termination of a movement. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2008, 119:290-300.
2. Aron A.R. The neural basis ofinhibitionin cognitive control. Neuroscientist 2007, 13(3):214-228.
3. Band G.P.H., van der Molen M.W., Logan G.D. Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. Acta Psychol. 2003, 112:105-142.
4. Bengson J.J., Mangun G.R., Mazaheri A. The neural markers of an imminent failure of response inhibition. Neuroimage 2012, 59:1534-1539.
5. Chatrian G.E., Lettich E., Nelson P.L. Ten percent electrode system for topographic studies of spontaneous and evoked EEG activity. Am. J. Electroencephalogr. Technol. 1985, 25:83-92.
6. Delorme A., Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 2004, 134:9-21.
7. Dimoska A., Johnstone S. Effects of varying stop-signal probability on ERPs in the stop-signal task: do they reflect variations in inhibitory processing or simply novelty effects?. Biol. Psychol. 2008, 77:324-336.
8. Eichele T., Rachakonda S., Brakedal B., Eikeland R., Calhoun V.D. EEGIFT: group independent component analysis for event-related EEG data. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2011, 2011:129365.
9. Enriquez-Geppert S., Konrad C., Pantev C., Huster R.J. Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task. Neuroimage 2010, 51:877-887.
10. Erhardt E., Allen E., Damaraju E., Calhoun V.D. On network derivation, classification, and visualization: a response to Habeck and Moeller. Brain Connect. 2011, 1:1-19.
11. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. Inhibition-related ERP components: variation with modality, age, and time-on-task. J. Psychophysiol. 2002, 16:167-175.
12. Grandchamp R., Delorme A. Single-trial normalization for event-related spectral decomposition reduces sensitivity to noisy trials. Front. Psychol. 2011, 2:236.
13. Gruendler T.O.J., Ullsperger M., Huster R.J. Event-related potential correlates of performance-monitoring in a lateralized time-estimation task. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e25591.
14. Grzegorczyk M., Husmeier D. Improving the structure MCMC sampler for Bayesian networks by introducing a new edge reversal move. Mach. Learn. 2008, 71:265-305.
15. Himberg J., Hyvärinen A., Esposito F. Validating the independent components of neuroimaging time series via clustering and visualization. Neuroimage 2004, 22:1214-1222.
16. Huster R.J., Westerhausen R., Pantev C., Konrad C. The role of the cingulate cortex as neural generator of the N200 and P300 in a tactile response inhibition task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2010, 31:1260-1271.
17. Huster R.J., Eichele T., Enriquez-Geppert S., Wollbrink A., Kugel H., Konrad C., Pantev C. Multimodal imaging of functional networks and event-related potentials in performance monitoring. Neuroimage 2011, 56:1588-1597.
18. Huster R.J., Westerhausen R., Herrmann C.S. Sex differences in cognitive control are associated with midcingulate and callosal morphology. Brain Struct. Funct. 2011, 215:225-235.
19. Huster R.J., Enriquez-Geppert S., Lavallee C.F., Falkenstein M., Herrmann C.S. Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2013, 87:217-233.
20. Kok A., Ramautar J.R., De Ruiter M.B., Band G.P.H., Ridderinkhof K.R. ERP components associated with successful and unsuccessful stopping in a stop-signal task. Psychophysiology 2004, 41:9-20.
21. Krämer U.M., Knight R.T., Münte T.F. Electrophysiological evidence for different inhibitory mechanisms when stopping or changing a planned response. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2011, 23:2481-2493.
22. Lei X., Ostwald D., Hu J., Qiu C., Porcaro C., Bagshaw A.P., Yao D. Multimodal functional network connectivity: an EEG-fMRI fusion in network space. PLoS One 2011, 6(9):e24642.
23. Mazaheri A., Nieuwenhuis I.L.C., van Dijk H., Jensen O. Prestimulus alpha and mu activity predicts failure to inhibit motor responses. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2009, 30:1791-1800.
24. Michel C.M., Murray M.M., Lantz G., Gonzalez S., Spinelli L., Grave de Peralta R. EEG source imaging. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2004, 115:2195-2222.
25. Mullen T., Acar Z.A., Worrell G., Makeig S. Modeling cortical source dynamics and interactions during seizure. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011, 1411-1414.
26. Nigbur R., Ivanova G., Stürmer B. Theta power as a marker for cognitive interference. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011, 122:2185-2194.
27. O'Connell R.G., Dockree P.M., Robertson I.H., Bellgrove M.A., Foxe J.J., Kelly S.P. Uncovering the neural signature of lapsing attention: electrophysiological signals predict errors up to 20s before they occur. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29:8604-8611.
28. Rubinov M., Sporns O. Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 2010, 52:1059-1069.
29. Sauseng P., Griesmayr B., Freunberger R., Klimesch W. Control mechanisms in working memory: a possible function of EEG theta oscillations. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2010, 34:1015-1022.
30. Schmiedt-Fehr C., Basar-Eroglu C. Event-related delta and theta brain oscillations reflect age-related changes in both a general and a specific neuronal inhibitory mechanism. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2011, 122:1156-1167.
31. Schmiedt-Fehr C., Dühl S., Basar-Eroglu C. Age-related increases in within-person variability: delta and theta oscillations indicate that the elderly are not always old. Neurosci. Lett. 2011, 495:159-163.
32. Shibata T., Shimoyama I., Ito T., Abla D., Iwasa H., Koseki K., Yamanouchi N., Sato T., Nakajima Y. The time course of interhemispheric EEG coherence during a GO/NO-GO task in humans. Neurosci. Lett. 1997, 233:117-120.
33. Shibata T., Shimoyama I., Ito T., Abla D., Iwasa H., Koseki K., Yamanouchi N., Sato T., Nakajima Y. The synchronization between brain areas under motor inhibition process in humans estimated by event-related EEG coherence. Neurosci. Res. 1998, 31:265-271.
34. Sporns O. Networks of the brain 2010, The MIT Press.
35. Stam C.J., van Straaten E.C.W. The organization of physiological brain networks. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2012, 123:1067-1087.
36. Swann N.C., Cai W., Conner C.R., Pieters T.A., Claffey M.P., George J.S., Aron A.R., Tandon N. Roles for the pre-supplementary motor area and the right inferior frontal gyrus in stopping action: electrophysiological responses and functional and structural connectivity. Neuroimage 2012, 59:2860-2870.
37. Tallet J., Barral J., Hauert C.-A. Electro-cortical correlates of motor inhibition: a comparison between selective and non-selective stop tasks. Brain Res. 2009, 1284:68-76.
38. Van den Wildenberg W.P.M., Burle B., Vidal F., van der Molen M.W., Ridderinkhof K.R., Hasbroucq T. Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm: a TMS study. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:225-239.
39. Van Straaten E.C.W., Stam C.J. Structure out of chaos: functional brain network analysis with EEG, MEG, and functional MRI. Eur. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2013, 23:7-18.
40. Yamanaka K., Yamamoto Y. Single-trial EEG power and phase dynamics associated with voluntary response inhibition. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2010, 22:714-727.
41. Yuan Z. Combining independent component analysis and Granger causality to investigate brain network dynamics with fNIRS measurements. Biomed. Opt. Express 2013, 4:2629-2643.
42. Zhang Y., Chen Y., Bressler S.L., Ding M. Response preparation and inhibition: the role of the cortical sensorimotor beta rhythm. Neuroscience 2008, 156:238-246.