Recalibration of inhibitory control systems during walking-related dual-task interference: A Mobile Brain-Body Imaging (MOBI) Study

NeuroImage

Volumn 94, Issue , 2014, Pages 55-64

  De Sanctis, Pierfilippo ^a,b   Butler, John S ^a,b   Malcolm, Brenda R ^a,b   Foxe, John J ^a,b  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Dual task design; EEG; Event related potentials; Gait; Inhibitory control; Mobile Brain Body Imaging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN FUNCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MOBILE BRAIN BODY IMAGING; MOTOR CONTROL; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; WALKING; WALKING SPEED; AMBULATORY MONITORING; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; CALIBRATION; DEVICES; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); NERVE CELL INHIBITION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

BRAIN MAPPING; CALIBRATION; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEEDBACK, PHYSIOLOGICAL; FEMALE; GAIT; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; NEURAL INHIBITION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WALKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84898606536     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.016     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Al-Yahya E., Dawes H., Smith L., Dennis A., Howells K., Cockburn J. Cognitive motor interference while walking: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011, 35:715-728.
2. Anderer P., Semlitsch H.V., Saletu B. Multichannel auditory event-related brain potentials: effects of normal aging on the scalp distribution of N1, P2, N2 and P300 latencies and amplitudes. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1996, 99:458-472.
3. Beauchet O., Dubost V., Herrmann F.R., Kressig R.W. Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2005, 2:26.
4. Bell R.P., Foxe J.J., Ross L.A., Garavan H. Intact inhibitory control processes in abstinent drug abusers (I): a functional neuroimaging study in former cocaine addicts. Neuropharmacology 2013, 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.02.018.
5. Bhatt T., Wening J.D., Pai Y.C. Influence of gait speed on stability: recovery from anterior slips and compensatory stepping. Gait Posture 2005, 21:146-156.
6. Bulea T.C., Kilicarslan A., Ozdemir R., Paloski W.H., Contreras-Vidal J.L. Simultaneous scalp electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), and whole-body segmental inertial recording for multi-modal neural decoding. J. Vis. Exp 2013, 10.3791/50602.
7. Casson A.J., Smith S., Duncan J.S., Rodriguez-Villegas E. Wearable EEG: what is it, why is it needed and what does it entail?. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2008, 2008:5867-5870.
8. De Sanctis P., Butler J.S., Green J.M., Snyder A.C., Foxe J.J. Mobile brain/body imaging (MoBI): high-density electrical mapping of inhibitory processes during walking. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2012, 2012:1542-1545.
9. De Sanctis P., Foxe J.J., Czobor P., Wylie G.R., Kamiel S.M., Huening J., Nair-Collins M., Krakowski M.I. Early sensory-perceptual processing deficits for affectively valenced inputs are more pronounced in schizophrenia patients with a history of violence than in their non-violent peers. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2013, 8(6):678-687.
10. Doi T., Makizako H., Shimada H., Yoshida D., Ito K., Kato T., Ando H., Suzuki T. Brain atrophy and trunk stability during dual-task walking among older adults. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2012, 67:790-795.
11. Duvinage M., Castermans T., Petieau M., Hoellinger T., Cheron G., Dutoit T. Performance of the Emotiv Epoc headset for P300-based applications. Biomed. Eng. Online 2013, 12:56.
12. Eimer M. Effects of attention and stimulus probability on ERPs in a Go/Nogo task. Biol. Psychol. 1993, 35:123-138.
13. Fabiani M., Friedman D. Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: the novelty oddball. Psychophysiology 1995, 32:579-594.
14. Falkenstein M., Koshlykova N.A., Kiroj V.N., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. Late ERP components in visual and auditory Go/Nogo tasks. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1995, 96:36-43.
15. Falkenstein M., Hoormann J., Hohnsbein J. ERP components in Go/Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition. Acta Psychol. 1999, 101:267-291.
16. Foxe J.J., Simpson G.V. Flow of activation from V1 to frontal cortex in humans. A framework for defining "early" visual processing. Exp. Brain Res. 2002, 142:139-150.
17. Friedman D., Simpson G.V. ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 1994, 2:49-63.
18. Friedman D., Simpson G., Hamberger M. Age-related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. Psychophysiology 1993, 30:383-396.
19. Garavan H., Ross T.J., Murphy K., Roche R.A., Stein E.A. Dissociable executive functions in the dynamic control of behavior: inhibition, error detection, and correction. NeuroImage 2002, 17:1820-1829.
20. Grabiner M.D., Troy K.L. Attention demanding tasks during treadmill walking reduce step width variability in young adults. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2005, 2:25.
21. Gramann K., Gwin J.T., Bigdely-Shamlo N., Ferris D.P., Makeig S. Visual evoked responses during standing and walking. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2010, 4:202.
22. Gramann K., Gwin J.T., Ferris D.P., Oie K., Jung T.P., Lin C.T., Liao L.D., Makeig S. Cognition in action: imaging brain/body dynamics in mobile humans. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 22:593-608.
23. Guthrie D., Buchwald J.S. Significance testing of difference potentials. Psychophysiology 1991, 28:240-244.
24. Gwin J.T., Gramann K., Makeig S., Ferris D.P. Removal of movement artifact from high-density EEG recorded during walking and running. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 103:3526-3534.
25. Gwin J.T., Gramann K., Makeig S., Ferris D.P. Electrocortical activity is coupled to gait cycle phase during treadmill walking. NeuroImage 2011, 54:1289-1296.
26. Harada T., Miyai I., Suzuki M., Kubota K. Gait capacity affects cortical activation patterns related to speed control in the elderly. Exp. Brain Res. 2009, 193:445-454.
27. Heuninckx S., Wenderoth N., Debaere F., Peeters R., Swinnen S.P. Neural basis of aging: the penetration of cognition into action control. J. Neurosci. 2005, 25:6787-6796.
28. Heuninckx S., Wenderoth N., Swinnen S.P. Systems neuroplasticity in the aging brain: recruiting additional neural resources for successful motor performance in elderly persons. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:91-99.
29. Heuninckx S., Wenderoth N., Swinnen S.P. Age-related reduction in the differential pathways involved in internal and external movement generation. Neurobiol. Aging 2010, 31:301-314.
30. Holtzer R., Verghese J., Xue X., Lipton R.B. Cognitive processes related to gait velocity: results from the Einstein Aging Study. Neuropsychology 2006, 20:215-223.
31. Holtzer R., Mahoney J.R., Izzetoglu M., Izzetoglu K., Onaral B., Verghese J. fNIRS study of walking and walking while talking in young and old individuals. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2011, 66:879-887.
32. Holtzer R., Wang C., Verghese J. The relationship between attention and gait in aging: facts and fallacies. Motor Control 2012, 16:64-80.
33. Isreal J.B., Chesney G.L., Wickens C.D., Donchin E. P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. Psychophysiology 1980, 17:259-273.
34. Isreal J.B., Wickens C.D., Chesney G.L., Donchin E. The event-related brain potential as an index of display-monitoring workload. Hum. Factors 1980, 22:211-224.
35. Katz R., De Sanctis P., Mahoney J.R., Sehatpour P., Murphy C.F., Gomez-Ramirez M., Alexopoulos G.S., Foxe J.J. Cognitive control in late-life depression: response inhibition deficits and dysfunction of the anterior cingulate cortex. Am. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 2010, 18:1017-1025.
36. Kelly A.M., Hester R., Murphy K., Javitt D.C., Foxe J.J., Garavan H. Prefrontal-subcortical dissociations underlying inhibitory control revealed by event-related fMRI. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2004, 19:3105-3112.
37. Kok A. On the utility of P3 amplitude as a measure of processing capacity. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:557-577.
38. Kramer A.F., Wickens C.D., Donchin E. An analysis of the processing requirements of a complex perceptual-motor task. Hum. Factors 1983, 25:597-621.
39. Kramer A.F., Sirevaag E.J., Braune R. A psychophysiological assessment of operator workload during simulated flight missions. Hum. Factors 1987, 29:145-160.
40. Kurz M.J., Wilson T.W., Arpin D.J. Stride-time variability and sensorimotor cortical activation during walking. NeuroImage 2012, 59:1602-1607.
41. Lajoie Y., Teasdale N., Bard C., Fleury M. Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium. Exp. Brain Res. 1993, 97:139-144.
42. Lang P.J., Bradley M.M., Cuthbert B.N. International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instructional manual. Technical report A-8 2008, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
43. Lehmann D., Skrandies W. Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1980, 48:609-621.
44. Li K.Z., Abbud G.A., Fraser S.A., Demont R.G. Successful adaptation of gait in healthy older adults during dual-task treadmill walking. Neuropsychol. Dev. Cogn. B Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 2012, 19:150-167.
45. Lovden M., Schaefer S., Pohlmeyer A.E., Lindenberger U. Walking variability and working-memory load in aging: a dual-process account relating cognitive control to motor control performance. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 2008, 63:P121-P128.
46. Makeig S., Gramann K., Jung T.P., Sejnowski T.J., Poizner H. Linking brain, mind and behavior. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2009, 73:95-100.
47. Manly B.F.J. Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology 1997, Chapman and Hall, London.
48. Molholm S., Ritter W., Murray M.M., Javitt D.C., Schroeder C.E., Foxe J.J. Multisensory auditory-visual interactions during early sensory processing in humans: a high-density electrical mapping study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 2002, 14:115-128.
49. Morie K.P., Garavan H., Bell R.P., De Sanctis P., Krakowski M.I., Foxe J.J. Intact inhibitory control processes in abstinent drug abusers (II): a high-density electrical mapping study in former cocaine and heroin addicts. Neuropharmacology 2013, 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2013.02.023.
50. Moyer B.E., Chambers A.J., Redfern M.S., Cham R. Gait parameters as predictors of slip severity in younger and older adults. Ergonomics 2006, 49:329-343.
51. Murray M.M., Wylie G.R., Higgins B.A., Javitt D.C., Schroeder C.E., Foxe J.J. The spatiotemporal dynamics of illusory contour processing: combined high-density electrical mapping, source analysis, and functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22:5055-5073.
52. Nolan H., Whelan R., Reilly R.B., Bulthoff H.H., Butler J.S. Acquisition of human EEG data during linear self-motion on a Stewart platform. 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering 2009, 585-588.
53. Nolan H., Butler J.S., Whelan R., Foxe J.J., Bulthoff H.H., Reilly R.B. Motion P3 demonstrates neural nature of motion ERPs. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011, 2011:3884-3887.
54. Nolan H., Butler J.S., Whelan R., Foxe J.J., Bulthoff H.H., Reilly R.B. Neural correlates of oddball detection in self-motion heading: a high-density event-related potential study of vestibular integration. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 219:1-11.
55. Oostenveld R., Fries P., Maris E., Schoffelen J.M. FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011, 2011:156869. 10.1155/2011/156869.
56. Polich J. Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2007, 118:2128-2148.
57. Sahyoun C., Floyer-Lea A., Johansen-Berg H., Matthews P.M. Towards an understanding of gait control: brain activation during the anticipation, preparation and execution of foot movements. NeuroImage 2004, 21:568-575.
58. Simoni D., Rubbieri G., Baccini M., Rinaldi L., Becheri D., Forconi T., Mossello E., Zanieri S., Marchionni N., Di Bari M. Different motor tasks impact differently on cognitive performance of older persons during dual task tests. Clin. Biomech. 2013, 28:692-696.
59. Snyder A.C., Shpaner M., Molholm S., Foxe J.J. Visual object processing as a function of stimulus energy, retinal eccentricity and Gestalt configuration: a high-density electrical mapping study. Neuroscience 2012, 221:1-11.
60. Suzuki M., Miyai I., Ono T., Kubota K. Activities in the frontal cortex and gait performance are modulated by preparation. An fNIRS study. NeuroImage 2008, 39:600-607.
61. Szturm T., Maharjan P., Marotta J.J., Shay B., Shrestha S., Sakhalkar V. The interacting effect of cognitive and motor task demands on performance of gait, balance and cognition in young adults. Gait Posture 2013, 38(4):596-602.
62. Uehara K., Higashi T., Tanabe S., Sugawara K. Alterations in human motor cortex during dual motor task by transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 208:277-286.
63. Wickens C.D., Israel J.B., Donchin E. The event-related cortical potential as an index of task workload. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 21st Annual Meeting Santa Monica 1977, Human Factors Society, CA. A.S. Neal, R.F. Palasek (Eds.).
64. Woollacott M., Shumway-Cook A. Attention and the control of posture and gait: a review of an emerging area of research. Gait Posture 2002, 16:1-14.