Acquisition of human EEG data during linear self-motion on a Stewart platform

2009 4th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, NER '09

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 585-588

  Nolan, Hugh ^a   Whelan, Robert ^a   Reilly, Richard B ^a   Bülthoff, Heinrich H ^b   Butler, John S ^b  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electroencephalography; Multisensory; P3; Self motion; Stewart platform; Vestibular

Indexed keywords

MULTISENSORY; P3; SELF-MOTION; STEWART PLATFORM; VESTIBULAR;

ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; MOTION CONTROL;

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY;

EID: 70350579061     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/NER.2009.5109364     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. H. Straka, N. Dieringer, Basic organization principles of the VOR: lessons from frogs, Progress in Neurobiology, Vol. 73(4), pp. 259-309, July 2004.
2. F. B. Horak, G. M. Earhart V. Dietz, Postural responses to combinations of head and body displacements: vestibular-somatosensory interactions, Exp Brain Res, Vol. 141, pp. 410-414, 2001.
3. J. O'Loughlin et al. Incidence of and risk factors for falls and injurious falls among the community-dwelling elderly, American journal of epidemiology, Vol. 137, pp. 342-54, 1993.
4. M. E. Tinetti, M. Speechley, Prevention of falls among the elderly, New England journal of medicine, Vol. 320, pp. 1055-1059, 1989.
5. S. R. Lord, D. McLean, G. Strathers, Physiological factors associated with injurious falls in older people living in the community, Gerontology, Vol. 38, pp. 338-346, 1992.
6. World Health Organization, Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis, Technical report series 843, Geneva, 1994.
7. G. Kovacs, M. Raabe, and M. W. Greenlee, The fMRI correlates of visually induced self-motion in depth, Cereberal Cortex, Vol. 18, pp. 1779-1787, 2008.
8. T. Brandt, P. Bartenstein, A. Janek, and M Dieterich. Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction, Reciprocal inhibitory visual-vestibular interaction. Visual motion stimulation deactivates the parieto-insular vestibular cortex, BRAIN, Vol. 121, pp. 1749-1758, 1998.
9. D. Stewart, A Platform with Six Degrees of Freedom, UK Institution of Mechanical Engineers Proceedings, Vol. 180, Pt 1, No 15, 1965-66.
10. D. Schneider, C. Kolchev, L. Constantinescu, C.-F. Claussen, Vestibular Evoked Potentials and Brain Electrical Activity Mapping - A Test of Vestibular Function - A Review, Int. Tinnitus Journal, Vol. 2, pp. 27-43, 1996.
11. J. D. Hood, A. Kayan, Observations upon the evoked responses to natural vestibular stimulation, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 62, pp. 266-276, 1985.
12. S. Sutton, M. Braren, J. Zubin, E. R John, Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty, Science, 150(3700), pp. 1187-1188, 1965.
13. M. von der Heyde, A Distributed Virtual Reality System for Spatial Updating: Concepts, Implementation, and Experiments, PhD thesis, Universität Bielefeld - Technische Fakultät, 2001.
14. http://www.brainproducts.com/ - Brain Products GmbH.
15. A. Delorme, S. Makeig, EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis, J. Neurosci Methods, Vol. 134, pp. 9-21, 2004.
16. http://www.biosemi.com/ - Biosemi company