Third-generation autofluorescence endoscopy for the detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus: A pilot study

Diseases of the Esophagus

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 276-284

  Boerwinkel, D F ^a   Holz, J A ^a   Aalders, M C G ^a   Visser, M ^a   Meijer, S L ^a   Van Berge Henegouwen, M I ^a   Weusten, B L A M ^a,b   Bergman, J J G H M ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b ST ANTONIUS HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Autofluorescence imaging; Barrett's esophagus; Endoscopy; Narrow band imaging; Neoplasia

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; EARLY CANCER; ESOPHAGOSCOPE; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NARROW BAND IMAGING; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SECOND GENERATION AUTOFLUORESCENCE IMAGING; THIRD GENERATION AUTOFLUORESCENCE ENDOSCOPY; WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY; CARCINOMA IN SITU; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC USE; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS TUMOR; FLUORESCENCE IMAGING; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LIGHT; PATHOLOGY; PRECANCER; PROCEDURES;

AGED; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CARCINOMA IN SITU; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LIGHT; MALE; NARROW BAND IMAGING; OPTICAL IMAGING; PILOT PROJECTS; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS;

EID: 84898597577     PISSN: 11208694     EISSN: 14422050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dote.12094     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Wang K K, Sampliner R E. Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2008; 103: 788-797.
2. Falk G W, Ours T M, Richter J E. Practice patterns for surveillance of Barrett's esophagus in the united states. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 197-203.
3. Levine D S, Haggitt R C, Blount P L etal. An endoscopic biopsy protocol can differentiate high-grade dysplasia from early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 1993; 105: 40-50.
4. Falk G W, Rice T W, Goldblum J R, Richter J E. Jumbo biopsy forceps protocol still misses unsuspected cancer in Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 49: 170-176.
5. Tschanz E R. Do 40% of patients resected for Barrett esophagus with high-grade dysplasia have unsuspected adenocarcinoma? Arch Pathol Lab Med 2005; 129: 177-180.
6. Richards-Kortum R, Sevick-Muraca E. Quantitative optical spectroscopy for tissue diagnosis. Annu Rev Phys Chem 1996; 47: 555-606.
7. Georgakoudi I, Jacobson B C, Van Dam J etal. Fluorescence, reflectance, and light-scattering spectroscopy for evaluating dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2001; 120: 1620-1629.
8. Kara M A, Peters F P, Ten Kate F J W etal. Endoscopic video autofluorescence imaging may improve the detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 679-685.
9. Kara M A, Peters F P, Fockens P, ten Kate F J W, Bergman J J G. Endoscopic video-autofluorescence imaging followed by narrow band imaging for detecting early neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 176-185.
10. Kara M A, Ennahachi M, Fockens P, ten Kate F J W, Bergman J J G. Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology) in Barrett's esophagus by using narrow band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 155-166.
11. Sharma P, Bansal A, Mathur S etal. The utility of a novel narrow band imaging endoscopy system in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 167-175.
12. Curvers W L, Singh R, Song L-M W-K etal. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution endoscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system. Gut 2008; 57: 167-172.
13. Curvers W L, Herrero L A, Wallace M B etal. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging is more effective than standard endoscopy in identifying early-stage neoplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1106-1114.
14. Curvers W L, van Vilsteren F G, Baak L C etal. Endoscopic trimodal imaging versus standard video endoscopy for detection of early Barrett's neoplasia: a multicenter, randomized, crossover study in general practice. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 195-203.
15. Kara M, DaCosta R S, Wilson B C, Marcon N E, Bergman J. Autofluorescence-based detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Dig Dis 2004; 22: 134-141.
16. Imaizumi K, Harada Y, Wakabayashi N etal. Dual-wavelength excitation of mucosal autofluorescence for precise detection of diminutive colonic adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 110-117.
17. Lundell L R, Dent J, Bennett J R etal. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut 1999; 45: 172-180.
18. Sharma P, Dent J, Armstrong D etal. The development and validation of an endoscopic grading system for Barrett's esophagus: the Prague C & M criteria. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1392-1399.
19. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003; 58 (6 Suppl): S3-43.
20. Curvers W L, Bohmer C J, Mallant-Hent R C etal. Mucosal morphology in Barrett's esophagus: interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 799-805.
21. Curvers W L, van den Broek F J C, Reitsma J B, Dekker E, Bergman J J G. Systematic review of narrow-band imaging for the detection and differentiation of abnormalities in the esophagus and stomach (with video). Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 307-317.
22. Schlemper R J, Riddell R H, Kato Y etal. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-255.