Mucosal morphology in Barrett's esophagus: Interobserver agreement and role of narrow band imaging

Endoscopy

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 799-805

  Curvers, W L ^a   Bohmer, C J ^b   Mallant Hent, R C ^c   Naber, A H ^d   Ponsioen, C I J ^a   Ragunath, K ^e   Singh, R ^e   Wallace, M B ^f   Wolfsen, H C ^f   Wong Kee Song, L M ^g   Lindeboom, R ^a   Fockens, P ^a   Bergman, J J ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b N   (Netherlands)

^c Flevohospital ^*  (Netherlands)

^d Ziekenhuis Hilversum   (Netherlands)

^e QUEEN S MEDICAL CENTRE   (United Kingdom)

^f MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^g MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CANCER GRADING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; ESOPHAGOSCOPY; ESOPHAGUS CANCER; ESOPHAGUS MUCOSA; HIGH RESOLUTION WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NARROW BAND IMAGING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

BARRETT ESOPHAGUS; CARCINOMA; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; ENDOSCOPY; ESOPHAGEAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; LIGHT; MICROSCOPY; MUCOUS MEMBRANE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 54049113430     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1077596     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Devesa SS, Blot WJ, Fraumeni JF Jr. Changing patterns in the incidence of esophageal and gastric carcinoma in the United States. Cancer 1998; 83: 2049-2053
2. Sampliner RE. Updated guidelines for the diagnosis, surveillance, and therapy of Barrett's esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 1888-1895
3. Hirota WK, Zuckerman MJ, Adler DG et al. ASGE guideline: the role of endoscopy in the surveillance of premalignant conditions of the upper GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 570-580
4. Sharma P, Weston AP, Topalovski M et al. Magnification chromoendoscopy for the detection of intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's oesophagus. Gut 2003; 52: 24-27
5. Guelrud M, Ehrlich EE. Endoscopic classification of Barrett's esophagus. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 58-65
6. Endo T, Awakawa T, Takahashi H et al. Classification of Barrett's epithelium by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 641-647
7. Meining A, Rosch T, Kiesslich R et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability of magnification chromoendoscopy for detecting specialized intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 160-164
8. Gono K, Obi T, Yamaguchi M et al. Appearance of enhanced tissue features in narrow-band endoscopic imaging. J Biomed Opt 2004; 9: 568-577
9. Kara MA, Ennahachi M, Fockens P et al. Detection and classification of the mucosal and vascular patterns (mucosal morphology) in Barrett's esophagus by using narrow band imaging. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 155-166
10. Dixon MF. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited. Gut 2002; 51: 130-131
11. Curvers WL, Singh R, Song LM et al. Endoscopic tri-modal imaging for detection of early neoplasia in Barrett's oesophagus: a multi-centre feasibility study using high-resolution encloscopy, autofluorescence imaging and narrow band imaging incorporated in one endoscopy system. Gut 2008; 57: 167-172
12. Anagnostopoulos GK, Yao K, Kaye P et al. Magnification endoscopy with narrow band imaging in Barrett's esophagus. J Clin Gastroenterol 2006; 40 (Suppl. 4): S192-S193
13. Anagnostopoulos GK, Yao K, Kaye P et al. Novel encloscopic observation in Barrett's oesophagus using high resolution magnification endoscopy and narrow band imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26: 501-507
14. Ragunath K, Krasner N, Raman VS et al. A randomized, prospective cross-over trial comparing methylene blue-directed biopsy and conventional random biopsy for detecting intestinal metaplasia and dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 998-1003
15. Yao K, Takaki Y, Ohara J et al. Magnification endoscopy outlines the microvascular architecture and extent of Barrett's intramucosal carcinoma prior to endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 1064-1065
16. Singh R, Owen V, Karageorgiou H et al. Narrow band imaging with magnification is superior to white light endoscopy with magnification in studying the mucosal morphology in Barrett's oesophagus [abstract]. Gut 2008; 57 Suppl 1: A14-A15
17. Wallace MB, Perelman LT, Backman V et al. Endoscopic detection of dysplasia in patients with Barrett's esophagus using light-scattering spectroscopy. Gastroenterology 2000; 119; 677-682
18. Wolfsen HC, Hemminger LL, Wallace MB. Detection of residual Barrett's mucosa after photodynamic therapy (PDT) using high definition narrow band imaging [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2006; 130: A310
19. Wong Kee Song LM, Wilson BC. Endoscopic detection of early upper GI cancers. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2005; 19: 833-856
20. Ferguson DD, DeVault KR, Krishna M et al. Enhanced magnification-directed biopsies do not increase the detection of intestinal metaplasia in patients with GERD. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 1611-1616
21. Savoy AD, Wolfsen HC, Raimondo M et al. The role of surveillance endoscopy and endosonography after endoscopic ablation of high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma of the esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2008; 21: 108-113
22. Wolfsen K Crook JE, Krishna M et al. Prospective, controlled tandem endoscopy study of narrow band imaging for dysplasia detection in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 32-40
23. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174
24. Curvers W Baak L, Kiesslich R et al. Chromoendoscopy and narrow-band imaging compared with high-resolution magnification endoscopy in Barrett's esophagus. Gastroenterology 2008; 134: 670-679
25. Sumiyama K, Kaise M, Nakayoshi T et al. Combined use of a magnifying endoscope with a narrow band imaging system and a multibending endoscope for en bloc EMR of early stage gastric cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 60: 79-84