The Obama effect: The perception of campaigning 2.0 in Swedish national election 2010

E-Governance and Civic Engagement: Factors and Determinants of E-Democracy

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 524-542

  Kaun, Anne ^a   Guyard, Carina ^a  

^a SÖDERTÖRN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898593091     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61350-083-5.ch026     Document Type: Chapter

References (39)

1. Andrejevic, M. (2009). Exploiting YouTube: Contradictions of user-generated labor. In Snickars, P., & Vonderau, P. (Eds.), The YouTube reader (pp. 406-423). Stockholm, Sweden: National Library of Sweden.
2. Bevelander, P., & Pendakur, R. (2008). Electoral participation as a measure of social inclusion for natives, immigrants and descendants in Sweden. Discussion Paper Series of the Institute of the Study of Labor. Retrieved October 25, 2010, from http://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izadps/dp3764.html
3. Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133-160. doi:10.2307/3235370
4. Carlsson, U., & Facht, U. (2010). Medie-Sverige: Statistik och analys, 2010. Göteborg, Sweden: NORDICOM-Sverige.
5. Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). The Internet and democratic citizenship. Theory, practice and policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Couper, M. (2008). Designing effective Web surveys. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Dean, J. (2010). Blog theory. Feedback and capture in the circuits of drive. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
8. Fenton, N. (2010). Re-imagining democracy. New media, young people, participation and politics. In Olsson, T., & Dahlgren, P. (Eds.), Young people, ICTs and democracy (pp. 19-34). Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.
9. Findahl, O. (2009). Svenskarna och Internet 2009. Retrieved October 29, 2010, from http://www.iis.se/docs/Svenskarna_och_Internet_2009.pdf
10. Gelin, M. (2009). Det amerikanska löftet: Barack Obamas väg till Vita huset. Stockholm, Sweden: Atlas.
11. Gelin, M. (2010). Presentation on social media. Södertörn University.
12. Gurevitch, M., Coleman, S., & Blumler, J. G. (2009). Political communication - Old and new media relationships. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 625, 164-181. doi:10.1177/0002716209339345
13. Gustafsson, N. (2010). New hopes for democracy or a pirated elite? Swedish social media users and political mobilisation. Paper presented at the Western Political Science Association Annual Conference, San Francisco, USA.
14. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511790867
15. Hast, L., & Ossiansson, E. (2010). Sociala medier. Myter och möjligheter. In Carlsson, U., & Facht, U. (Eds.), Medie Sverige 2010. Statistik och analys (pp. 67-80). Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom Sverige Göteborgs Universitet.
16. Howard, P. N. (2006). New media campaigns and the managed citizen. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Jennings, K. M., & Zeitner, V. (2003). Internet use and civic engagement. A longitudinal analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 67, 311-334. doi:10.1086/376947
18. Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In Blumler, J. G., & Katz, E. (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (pp. 19-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
19. Martinsson, J. (1999). IT-valet? Internets betydelse för valkampanjerna. In B. R. Barber & E. Amnå (Eds.), Statens offentliga utredningar: IT i demokratins tjänst. Stockholm, Sweden: Fakta info direkt.
20. Negroponte, N. (1996). Being digital. London, UK: Coronet.
21. Noam, E. M. (2005). Why the Internet is bad for democracy. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 57-58. doi:10.1145/1089107.1089138
22. Nord, L. W. (2006). Still the middle way: A study of political communication practices in Swedish election campaigns. Press/Politics, 11(1), 64-76.
23. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511609343
24. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide? Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Norris, P. (2002). Revolution, what revolution? The Internet and U.S. elections, 1992-2000. In Kamarck, E. C. (Ed.), Governance.com: Democracy in the information age (pp. 59-80). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
26. Oscarsson, H., & Holmberg, S. (2007). Swedish voting behavior. Göteborg, Sweden: Swedish Election Studies Program, Department of Political Science, Göteborg University.
27. Papacharissi, Z. (2002). The virtual sphere: The Internet as a public sphere. New Media & Society, 4(1), 9-27. doi:10.1177/14614440222226244
28. Peterson, R. L. (2008). Strange bedfellows: How late-night comedy turns democracy into a joke. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
29. Petersson, O., Djerf-Pierre, M., Holmberg, S., Strömbäck, J., & Weibull, L. (2006). Media and elections in Sweden: Report from the Democratic Audit of Sweden 2006. Stockholm, Sweden: SNS Förlag.
30. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5). Retrieved October 25, 2010, from http://www.marcprensky.com/writing/Prensky%20-%20Digital%20Natives,%20Digital%20Immigrants%20-%20Part1.pdf
31. Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge, UK: Perseus Publications.
32. Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K., & Bryant, A. N. (2003). Assessing response rates and nonresponse bias in web and paper surveys. Research in Higher Education, 44(4), 409-432. doi:10.1023/A:1024232915870
33. Stakston, B. (2010). Politik 2.0: Konsten att använda sociala medier: Bok & blogg. Göteborg, Sweden: Beijbom Books.
34. Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2006). Do politicians lead the tango? A study of the relationship between Swedish journalists and their political sources in the context of election campaigns. European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 147-164. doi:10.1177/0267323105064043
35. Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2008). Media and politics in Sweden. In Strömbäck, J., Ørsten, M., & Aalberg, T. (Eds.), Communicating politics: Political communication in the Nordic countries. Göteborg, Sweden: Nordicom.
36. Tichenor, P. J., Donohue, G. A., & Olien, C. N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(2), 159-170. doi:10.1086/267786
37. Witmer, D. F., Colman, R. W., & Lee Katzman, S. (1999). From paper-and-pencil to screen-and-keyboard: Toward a methodology for survey research on the internet. In Jones, S. (Ed.), Doing internet research. Critical issues and methods for examining the net (pp. 145-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
38. Wu Song, F. (2010). Theorizing Web 2.0. A cultural perspective. Information Communication and Society, 13(2), 249-275. doi:10.1080/13691180902914610
39. Zittel, T. (2004). Political communication and electronic democracy: American exceptionalism or global trend? In Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (Eds.), Comparing political communication: Theories, cases, and challenges. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511606991.011