T2*-correction in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI from double-echo acquisitions

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 39, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1314-1319

  Kleppestø, Magne ^a   Larsson, Christopher ^a,b   Groote, Inge ^c   Salo, Raimo ^a   Vardal, Jonas ^a,b   Courivaud, Frédéric ^a   Bjørnerud, Alte ^a,c  

^a OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

AIF; DCE MRI; dynamic contrast enhanced MRI; glioma

Indexed keywords

GADOBUTROL; CONTRAST MEDIUM; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND;

ADULT; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTERIAL INPUT FUNCTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; DYNAMIC CONSTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMAN; KINETICS; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAGNITUDE ESTIMATION METHOD; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PLASMA VOLUME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; T2 EFFECT; ALGORITHM; ARTIFACT; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DIAGNOSTIC USE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84898487707     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24268     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Tofts PS, Kermode AG,. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991; 17: 357-367.
2. O'Connor JP, Jackson A, Parker GJ, Roberts C, Jayson GC,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in clinical trials of antivascular therapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012; 9: 167-177.
3. Awasthi R, Rathore RK, Soni P, et al. Discriminant analysis to classify glioma grading using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and immunohistochemical markers. Neuroradiology 2012; 54: 205-213.
4. Haacke EM, Filleti CL, Gattu R, et al. New algorithm for quantifying vascular changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI independent of absolute T1 values. Magn Reson Med 2007; 58: 463-472.
5. Bagher-Ebadian H, Jain R, Nejad-Davarani SP, et al. Model selection for DCE-T1 studies in glioblastoma. Magn Reson Med 2012; 68: 241-251.
6. Barboriak DP, MacFall JR, Viglianti BL, Dewhirst MW,. Comparison of three physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models for the prediction of contrast agent distribution measured by dynamic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 1388-1398.
7. Sourbron SP, Buckley DL,. On the scope and interpretation of the Tofts models for DCE-MRI. Magn Reson Med 2011; 66: 735-745.
8. Foottit C, Cron GO, Hogan MJ, Nguyen TB, Cameron I,. Determination of the venous output function from MR signal phase: feasibility for quantitative DCE-MRI in human brain. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 772-781.
9. Knutsson L, Borjesson S, Larsson EM, et al. Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow in normal volunteers: correlation between Xe-133 SPECT and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007; 26: 913-920.
10. Wang H, Cao Y,. Correction of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the liver. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36: 411-421.
11. Larsson HB, Hansen AE, Berg HK, Rostrup E, Haraldseth O,. Dynamic contrast-enhanced quantitative perfusion measurement of the brain using T1-weighted MRI at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 27: 754-762.
12. Larsson HB, Rosenbaum S, Fritz-Hansen T,. Quantification of the effect of water exchange in dynamic contrast MRI perfusion measurements in the brain and heart. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 272-281.
13. Tofts PS,. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997; 7: 91-101.
14. Lu H, Clingman C, Golay X, van Zijl PC,. Determining the longitudinal relaxation time (T1) of blood at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 679-682.
15. Rohde GK, Barnett AS, Basser PJ, Marenco S, Pierpaoli C,. Comprehensive approach for correction of motion and distortion in diffusion-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 103-114.
16. Bjornerud A, Emblem KE,. A fully automated method for quantitative cerebral hemodynamic analysis using DSC-MRI. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010; 30: 1066-1078.
17. Murase K,. Efficient method for calculating kinetic parameters using T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2004; 51: 858-862.
18. Likar B, Viergever MA, Pernus F,. Retrospective correction of MR intensity inhomogeneity by information minimization. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2001; 20: 1398-1410.
19. Chang CI, Chen K, Wang JW, Althouse MLG,. A relative entropy-based approach to image thresholding. Pattern Recognition 1994; 27: 1275-1289.
20. Larsson C, Kleppesto M, Rasmussen I Jr, et al. Sampling requirements in DCE-MRI based analysis of high grade gliomas: simulations and clinical results. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37: 818-829.
21. van Osch MJ, Vonken EJ, Viergever MA, van der Grond J, Bakker CJ,. Measuring the arterial input function with gradient echo sequences. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 1067-1076.
22. Kjolby BF, Ostergaard L, Kiselev VG,. Theoretical model of intravascular paramagnetic tracers effect on tissue relaxation. Magn Reson Med 2006; 56: 187-197.
23. de Bazelaire C, Rofsky NM, Duhamel G, et al. Combined T2* and T1 measurements for improved perfusion and permeability studies in high field using dynamic contrast enhancement. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 2083-2091.