Research methods for urban planning in the digital age

Online Research Methods in Urban and Planning Studies: Design and Outcomes

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 1-16

  Silva, Carlos Nunes ^a  

^a INSTITUTO DE GEOGRAFIA E ORDENAMENTO DO TERRITÓRIO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898256340     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-0074-4.ch001     Document Type: Chapter

References (63)

1. Al-Kodmany, K. (2010). Political power, governance and e-Planning. In Silva, C. N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 143-166). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch008
2. Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2012). Urban Planning 2.0. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 1(1), 16-30. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2012010103
3. Bassett, E. H., & O'Riordan, K. (2002). Ethics of Internet research: Contesting the human subjects research model. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 233-247. doi:10.1023/A:1021319125207
4. Battles, H. T. (2010). Exploring Ethical and Methodological Issues in Internet-Based Research with Adolescents. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 9(1), 27-39.
5. Bishop, I. (2012). On-line approaches to data delivery and visualisation in landscape planning and management. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 1(1), 31-41. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2012010104
6. Blanke, J. M. (2004). Copyright law in the digital age. In Brennan, L. L., & Johnson, V. E. (Eds.), Social, Ethical and Policy Implications of Information Technology (pp. 223-233). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing. doi:10.4018/978-1-59140-168-1.ch013
7. Borzemski, L. (2010). The Experimental Design for Data Mining to Discover Web Performance Issues in a Wide Area Network. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 41, 31-45. doi:10.1080/01969720903408763
8. Briassoulis, H. (2010). Online petitions: new tools of secondary analysis? Qualitative Research, 10(6), 715-727. doi:10.1177/1468794110380530
9. Bricout, J., & Baker, P. (2010). Deploying information and communication technologies to enhance participation in local governance for citizens with disabilities. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 2(2), 34-51. doi:10.4018/jicthd.2010040103
10. Buchanan, E. (Ed.). (2004). Readings in Virtual Research Ethics: Issues and controversies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
11. Buchwald, D., Schantz-Laursen, B., & Delmar, C. (2009). Video Diary Data Collection in Research with Children: An Alternative Method. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 12-20.
12. Camarada, D. (2010). Beyond citizen participation in planning: multi-agent systems for complex decision-making. In Silva, C. N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 404-419). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch010
13. Cantrell, M. A., & Lupinacci, P. (2007). Methodological issues in online data collection. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 60(5), 544-549. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04448.x
14. Capurro, R., & Pingel, C. (2002). Ethical issues of online communication research. Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 189-194. doi:10.1023/A:1021372527024
15. Chou, C. (2002). Developing the e-Delphi system: a web-based forecasting tool for educational research. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 233-237. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00257
16. Chun, S. A., & Artigas, F. (2012). Sensors and Crowdsourcing for Environmental Awareness and Emergency Planning. International Journal of E-Planning Research, 1(1), 56-74. doi:10.4018/ijepr.2012010106
17. Cohen, D. J., Leviton, L. C., Isaacson, N., Tallia, A. F., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). Online Diaries for Qualitative Evaluation. The American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 163-184. doi:10.1177/1098214006288448
18. Corbett, J., & Mann, R. (2010). Tlowitsis ReImagined: The Use of Digital Media to Build Nation and Overcome Disconnection in a Displaced Aboriginal. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 2(3), 33-54. doi:10.4018/jicthd.2010070103
19. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Research design. Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
20. Dever, J., Rafferty, A., & Valliant, R. (2008). Internet survey: can statistical adjustments eliminate coverage bias? Survey Research Methods, 2(2), 47-60.
21. Dwyer, C., & Davies, G. (2010). Qualitative methods III: animating archives, artful interventions and online environments. Progress in Human Geography, 34(1), 88-97. doi:10.1177/0309132508105005
22. Elgesem, D. (2002). What is special about the ethical issues in online research? Ethics and Information Technology, 4, 195-203. doi:10.1023/A:1021320510186
23. Elwood, S. (2006). Critical issues in participatory GIS: Deconstructions, reconstructions, and new research directions. Transactions in GIS, 10(5), 693-708. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9671.2006.01023.x
24. Frankfort-Nachmias, C., & Nachmias, D. (2000). Research Methods in the Social Sciences (6th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.
25. Ganassali, S. (2008). The influence of the design of web survey questionnaires on the quality of responses. Survey Research Methods, 2(1), 21-32.
26. Glasser, D. J., Goodman, K. W., & Einspruch, N. G. (2007). Chips, tags and scanners: Ethical challenges for radio frequency identification. Ethics and Information Technology, 9, 101-109. doi:10.1007/s10676-006-9124-0
27. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69, 211-221. doi:10.1007/s10708-007-9111-y
28. Healy, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave-Macmillan.
29. Horelli, L., & Wallin, S. (2010). The future-making assessment approach as a tool for e-planning and community development - the case of Ubiquitous Helsinki. In Silva, C. N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 58-79). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch004
30. Jansen, B. J., Spink, A., & Saracevic, T. (2000). Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information Processing & Management, 36, 207-227. doi:10.1016/S0306-4573(99)00056-4
31. Jobst, M., Dollner, J., & Lubanski, O. (2010). Communicating Geoinformation effectively with virtual 3D city models. In Silva, C. N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 120-142). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch007
32. Johnson, J. B., Reynolds, H., & Josylin, R. (2001). Political Science Research Methods (4th ed.). Washington, DC: CQ Press.
33. Kenten, C. (2010). Narrating Oneself: Reflections on the Use of Solicited Diaries with Diary Interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative. Social Research, 11(2). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1002160
34. Klessmann, J. (2010). Portals as a tool for public participation in urban planning. In Silva, C. N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 252-267). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch013
35. Kubicek, H. (2010). The potential of e-Participation in urban planning: a European perspective. In Silva, C. N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 168-194). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch009
36. Lavrakas, P. J. (Ed.). (2008). Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Limb, M., & Dwyer, C. (Eds.). (2001). Qualitative Methodologies for Geographers. Issues and debates. London, UK: Arnold.
38. Littleton, D. (2007). Navigating Pitfalls of Web-Based Survey Development and Administration. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 26(4), 75-83. doi:10.1300/J115v26n04_06
39. Lobe, B., & Vehovar, V. (2009). Towards a flexible online mixed method design with a feedback loop. Quality & Quantity, 43(4), 585-597. doi:10.1007/s11135-007-9146-7
40. Madge, C. (2007). Developing a geographers' agenda for online research ethics. Progress in Human Geography, 31(5), 654-674. doi:10.1177/0309132507081496
41. Madge, C., & O'Connor, H. (2002). On-line with e-mums: exploring the Internet as a medium for research. Area, 34(1), 92-102. doi:10.1111/1475-4762.00060
42. Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2006). Designing qualitative research. London, UK: Sage.
43. Milligan, C., Bingley, A., & Gatrell, A. (2005). Digging deep: Using diary techniques to explore the place of health and well-being amongst older people. Social Science & Medicine, 61, 1882- 1892. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.002
44. Morrow, V. (2008). Ethical dilemmas in research with children and young people about their social environments. Children's Geographies, 6(1), 49-61. doi:10.1080/14733280701791918
45. Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C., & McNeal, R. (Eds.). (2008). Digital citizenship. The Internet, Society, and Participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Murthy, D. (2008). Digital EthnograpShy: An Examination of the Use of New Technologies for Social Research. Sociology, 42(5), 837-855. doi:10.1177/0038038508094565
47. Newman, W. L. (2000). Social research Methods. Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). London, UK: Allyn and Bacon.
48. Nordin, K., & Berglund, U. (2010). Children's Maps in GIS: A Tool for Communicating Outdoor Experiences in Urban Planning. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 2(2), 1-16. doi:10.4018/jicthd.2010040101
49. Ohbuchi, E., Hanaizumi, H., & Hock, L. A. (2004). Barcode Readers using the Camera Device in Mobile Phones. In Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International Conference on Cyberworlds (CW'04) (pp. 260-265).
50. Pang, L., Morgan-Morris, V., & Howell, A. (2010). RFID in Urban Planning. In Silva, C. N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 388-403). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch020
51. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
52. Porter, S., & Whitcomb, M. (2005). E-mail subject lines and their effect on web survey viewing and response. Social Science Computer Review, 23(3), 380-387. doi:10.1177/0894439305275912
53. Reips, U.-D. (2001). The Web Experimental Psychology Lab: Five years of data collection on the Internet. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 33(2), 201-211. doi:10.3758/BF03195366
54. Rohs, M., & Gfeller, B. (2004). Using Camera-Equipped Mobile Phones for Interacting with Real-World Objects. In Advances in Pervasive Computing (pp. 265-271). Zurich, Switzerland: Institute for Pervasive Computing, Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich.
55. Schultz, R. A. (Ed.). (2006). Contemporary issues in ethics and information technology. London, UK: IRM Press.
56. Sheppard, S. R. J., & Cizek, P. (2009). The ethics of Google Earth: Crossing thresholds from spatial data to landscape visualisation. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2102-2117. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.012
57. Silva, C. N. (2007). Urban Planning and Ethics. In Rabin, J., & Berman, E. M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy (2nd ed.). New York, NY: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1201/NOE1420052756.ch410
58. Silva, C. N. (2008a). Experimental Design. In Lavrakas, P. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59. Silva, C. N. (2008b). Research ethics in e-public administration. In Garson, G. D., & Khosrow-Pour, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Public Information Technology (Vol. 1, pp. 314-322). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-59904-857-4.ch030
60. Spinello, R. (2003). The future of intellectual property. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 1-16. doi:10.1023/A:1024976203396
61. Staffans, A., Rantanen, H., & Nummi, P. (2010). Local Internet Forums. Interactive land use planning and urban development neighborhoods. In Silva, C. N. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring (pp. 80-102). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference. doi:10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch005
62. Stewart, K., & Williams, M. (2005). Researching online populations: the use of online focus groups for social research. Qualitative Research, 5(4), 395-416. doi:10.1177/1468794105056916
63. Tregeagle, S. (2010). Participation in child welfare services through information and communication technologies. International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development, 2(2), 17-33. doi:10.4018/jicthd.2010040102