The potential of e-participation in urban planning: A European perspective

Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 168-194

  Kubicek, Herbert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870899790     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch009     Document Type: Chapter

References (48)

1. Aichholzer, G., & Westholm, H. (2009). Evaluating eParticipation Projects. Practical Examples and Outline of an Evaluation Framework. European Journal of ePractice. Retrieved from http://www.epracticejournal.eu/document/5511
2. Arnstein, S. R. (1971). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association. American Planning Association, 35(4), 216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
3. Campagna, M. (2007). Citizens Participation in Urban Planning. Summary Note for the ESF-LiU Conference, Electronic Democracy - Achievements and Challenges. Vadstena, Sweden, 21-25 November 2007. Retrieved December 13, 2008, from http://www.docs.ifib.de/esfconference07/conf_programme.html
4. Coleman, S., & Goetze, J. (2001). Bowling Together. Online Public Engagement in Policy Deliberation. London, UK: Hansard Society and BT. Retrieved from http://bowlingtogether.net
5. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities. (2000). Guidelines for a policy on citizens' responsible participation in municipal and regional life. Resolution 91. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
6. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities. (2008a). Electronic democracy and deliberative consultation on urban projects. Resolution 267. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
7. Congress of Local and Regional Authorities. (2008b). Electronic democracy and deliberative consultation on urban projects. Recommendation 249. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
8. Council of Ministers. (2001). Recommendation to member states on the participation of citizens in local public life. Recommendation (2001)19. Strasbourg, France: Council of Europe.
9. Craig, W. J., Harns, T. M., & Weiner, D. (Eds.). (2002). Community Participation and Geographic Information Systems. London: Taylor and Francis.
10. Creasy, S., Gavelin, K., Fisher, H., Holmes, L., & Desai, M. (2007). Engage for Change: The Role of Public Engagement in Climate Change Policy. The result of research undertaken for the Sustainable Development Commission. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://www.sd-commission.org.uk/publications.php?id=618
11. DEMO-net. (2007). Introducing eParticipation. DEMO-net booklet series No. 1. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission European Commission. (2003a). Directive 2003/4/EC. On public access to environmental information.
12. European Commission. (2003b). Directive 2003/35/EC.
13. Green Mountain Institute for Environmental Democracy. (2005). Environmental Democracy What's in it for me? Montpellier, France. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://www.gmied.org/comment.htm
14. Hagen, M. (2000). Digital Democracy and Political Systems. In Hacker, K., & van Dijk, J. (Eds.), Digital Democracy: Issues of Theory & Practice (pp. 54-69). London: Sage.
15. Honor Fagan, G., Newman, D. R., McCusker, P., & Murray, M. (2006). E-consultation: evaluating appropriate technologies and processes for citizens' participation in public policy. EConsultation Research Project, Final Report, 14 July 2006. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://www.e-consultation.org
16. Initiative eParticipation. (2005). Elektronische Bürgerbeteiligung in deutschen Großstädten. Zweites Web-Ranking der Initiative eParticipation. (M. Bräuer & T. Biewendt, Eds.). Retrieved from http://www.initiative-eparticipation.de
17. Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2004). Reframing Public Participation: Strategies for the 21st Century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 419-436. doi:10.1080/1464935042000293170
18. Kiss, C., Poltimae, H., Struminska, M., & Ewing, M. (2006). Environmental Democracy. An Assessment of Access to Information, Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters in Selected European Countries. The Access Initiative Europe and The EMLAAssociation. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://www.emla.hu/img_upload/0aa155da39c21509c55c587879f86484/TAI_1.pdf
19. Kubicek, H. (2008). Electronic Democracy Achievements and Challenges. In the ESF Research Conference in Vadstena, Sweden, 21-25 November 2007. Retrieved from http://www.docs.ifib.de/esfconference07
20. Kubicek, H., Lippa, B., & Westholm, H. (2009). Medienmix in der lokalen Demokratie. Berlin, Germany: Ed. sigma
21. Kubicek, H., & Westholm, W. (2010). Consensus Building by Blended Participation. The Case of the Public Stadium Swimming Pool in Bremen. In S. French & D. R. Insua (Eds.), E-Democracy: A Group Decision and Negotiation Oriented Approach. Berlin: Springer.
22. Lippa, B., Aichholzer, G., Allhutter, D., et al. (2008). eParticipation. Evaluation and Impact. DEMO-net Booklet 13.3. Retrieved from http://www.ifib.de/publikationsdateien/DEMOnet_booklet_13.3_eParticipation_evaluation.pdf
23. Macintosh, A., & Coleman, S. (2006). Multidisciplinary Roadmap and Report from eParticipation Research. DEMO-net Deliverable D 4.2. Retrieved from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC/documents/Demo-net%204_2_multidisciplinary_roadmap.pdf
24. Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., & Lalljee, M. (2005). E-Methods for Public Engagement: Helping Local Authorities communicate with citizens. Bristol City Council for the Local eDemocracy National Project. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://itc.napier.ac.uk/ITC/Documents/eMethods_guide2005.pdf
25. Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2006). Evaluating how e-participation changes local democracy. eGovernment Workshop '06 (eGOV06), 11 September 2006, Brunel University, London.
26. Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2007). Towards an Evaluation Framework for eParticipation. Workshop on Frameworks and Methods for Evaluating eParticipation, Bremen, Germany.
27. OECD. (2001a). Citizens as partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-Making. Paris, France: OECD.
28. OECD. (2001b). Engaging Citizens in Policymaking: Information, Consultation and Public Participation. PUMA Policy Brief, 10. Paris, France: OECD.
29. OECD. (2003). Promise and Problems of E-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. Paris, France: OECD.
30. OECD. (2005). Evaluating Public Participation in Policy Making. Paris, France: OECD.
31. OECD. (2007). Working Party on the Information Economy. Participative Web: User-created Content. Paris, France: OECD.
32. Osimo, D. (2008). Web 2.0 in Government. Why and How. JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. Brussels, Belgium: Joint Research Centres European Commission.
33. Peart, M. N., & Ramos Diaz, J. (2007). Comparative Project on Local e-Democracy. Initiatives in Europe and North America. Geneva, Switzerland: University of Geneva. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://edc.unige.ch/edcadmin/images/ESF%20-%20Local%20E-Democracy.pdf
34. Pratchett, L. (2006). Understanding e-democracy developments in Europe. Scoping Paper. In Ad hoc Committee on e-democracy (CAHDE), Strasbourg, 18-19 September 2006. Retrieved December 12, 2008, from http://www.coe.int/t/e/integrated_projects/democracy/02-activities/002_e-democracy/CAHDE(2006)E_Scopingpapers.asp
35. Pratchett, L., et al. (2005). Barriers to e-Democracy. Local e-Democracy National Project. Retrieved May 27, 2005, from http://www.e-democracy.gov.uk
36. Pratchett, L., et al. (2009). Empowering Communities to Influence Local Decisoin_Making. A Systematic Review of the Evidence. Department for Communiuties and Local Government, United Kingdom, June 2009. Retrieved March 12, 2010, from http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/localgovernment/localdecisionlessons
37. Rose, J., Lippa, B., & Rios, J. (2009). (accepted). Technology Support for Participatory Budgeting. International Journal of Electronic Government.
38. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. G. (2000). Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Journal of Science. Technology & Human Values, 25(1), 3. doi:10.1177/016224390002500101
39. Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI). (2007). Guidelines on Effective Community Involvement and Consultation. RTPI Good Practice Note 1. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://www.rtpi.org.uk/download/364/RTPI-GPN1-Consultation-v1-2006.pdf
40. Sieber, R. (2000). Public Participation and Geographic Information Systems. A Literature Review and Framework. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 96(3), 491-507. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8306.2006.00702.x
41. Steinmann, R., Kerk, A., & Blaschke, T. (2004). Analysis of Online Public Participatory GIS Applications with Respect to the Difference between the US and Europe. In UDMS - Urban Data Management Symposium, Chioggia, Italy, 2004. Retrieved from http://www.salzburgresearch.at/research
42. Stiftung Mitarbeit. (2007). E-Partizipation. Bonn, Deutschland: Beteiligungsprojekte im Internet.
43. Strauss, W.-C. (2006). Öffentlichkeits- und Trägerbeteiligung in der Bauleitplanung im und über das Internet. Erste Erfahrungen aus den Kommunen. Fachtagung Bauleitplanung und Internet. Berlin, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Urbanistik.
44. Thaler, R. H. & Sunstein, C., R. (2008): Nudge. Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press 2008
45. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-Governance Developments in EU Cities, Reshaping Government Relation to Citizens. Governancy, 19(2), 687-699.
46. UNECE Convention on Access to Information. (1998, June 25). Public Participation in DecisionMaking and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Aarhus, Denmark. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://www.unece.org/env/pp
47. UNECE Economic Commission for Europe. (2005). Synthesis Report on the Status of Implementation of the Convention. Retrieved December 11, 2008, from http://www.unece.org/env/pp/reports%20implementation.htm
48. Wiedemann, P. M., & Femers, S. (1993). Public Participation in Waste Management Decisionmaking. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 33(3), 355-368. doi:10.1016/0304-3894(93)85085-S