The future-making assessment approach as a tool for e-planning and community development: The case of ubiquitous Helsinki

Handbook of Research on E-Planning: ICTs for Urban Development and Monitoring

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 58-79

  Horelli, Liisa ^a   Wallin, Sirkku ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898288325     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-61520-929-3.ch004     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Aaltonen, M. (2007a). The Third Lens. Multi-ontology Sense-making and Strategic Decision-making. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
2. Aaltonen, M. (2007b). Chronotope Space - Managing Time and the Properties of Strategic Landscape. Foresight, 9(4), 58-62. doi:10.1108/14636680710773830
3. Aaltonen, M. (2007c). The Return to Multi-Causality. Journal of Futures Studies, 12(1), 81-86.
4. Aaltonen, M., & Sanders, T.I. (2006). Identifying Systems" New Initial Conditions as Influence Points for Future. Foresight: Journal of futures studies, strategic thinking and policy, 8(3), 28-35.
5. Aichholzer, G., & Kozeluh, U. (2007). eParticipation and Democracy: Evaluation dimensions and approaches. In B. Lippa (Ed.), DEMO-net: Research workshop report - Frameworks and methods for evaluating e-participation (pp. 31-43). Bremen, Germany: IST Network of Excellence Project.
6. Akrich, M. (1995). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Anttiroiko, A.-V. (2003). eGovernment. eGovernment-alan tutkimuksen ja opetuksen kehittäminen Tampereen yliopistossa [Development of the research and teaching of eGovernment at the University of Tampere]. Retrieved December 3, 2008, from http://www.uta.fi/laitokset/ISI/julkaisut/eGovernment-raportti_1-2002.html#Luku1
8. Aurigi, A. (2005). Making the Digital City. The Early Shaping of Urban Internet Space. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
9. Aurigi, A., & de Cindio, F. (Eds.). (2008). Augmented Urban Spaces. Articulating the Physical and Electronic City. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
10. Booher, D., & Innes, J. E. (2002). Network Power in Collaborative Planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(3), 221-236. doi:10.1177/0739456X0202100301
11. Bouton, N. (2009). Designing for the Community Experience. Retrieved May 28, 2009 from http://www.slideshare.net/nickbouton/designing-for-the-community-experience-vanue-may-2609-1497974
12. Bryson, V. (2007). Gender and the Politics of Time. Feminist theory and contemporary debates. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
13. Buchsbaum, T. (2008). E-democracy and E-Parliament. Thoughts and Standard-setting of the Council of Europe. Retrieved December 3, 2008 from http://www.bmeia.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/bmeia/media/AOes/e-Democracy/CAHDE_2008/Sofia_IPAIT_-_Buchsbaum_080610_final.pdf
14. Carden, F. (2008, October). Ordinary Word, Extraordinary Confusion: Cause in development evaluation. Paper presented at the Conference of the European Evaluation Society, Lisbon.
15. Chadwick, A., & May, C. (2003). Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: E-Government in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance, 16(2), 271-300. Retrieved December 3, 2008 from http://www.bmeia.gv.at/fileadmin/user_upload/bmeia/media/AOes/e-Democracy/CAHDE_2008/Sofia_IPAIT_-_Buchsbaum_080610_final.pdf
16. Engeström, Y. (2008). From Teams to Knots. Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511619847
17. Fetterman, D. (2001). Foundations of Empowerment Evaluation. London: Sage.
18. Forlano, L. (2009). Codespaces: Community wireless networks and the reconfiguration of cities. In Foth, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City (pp. 292-309). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
19. Foth, M. (Ed.). (2009). Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
20. Foth, M., Choi, J. H., Bilandzic, M., & Satchell, C. (2008, October). Collective and Network Sociality in an Urban Village. Paper presented at the MindTrek-conference, Tampere, Finland.
21. Freschi, A. C., Raffini, L., Balocchi, M., & Tizzi, G. (2007). White paper. In Lippa, B. (Ed.), DEMOnet: Research workshop report - Frameworks and methods for evaluating e-participation (pp. 76-85). Bremen, Germany: IST Network of Excellence Project.
22. Glenn, J. C., & Gordon, T. J. (2003). Futures Research Methodology - V2.0. AC/UNU Millennium Project.
23. Gurstein, M. (2007). What is community informatics (and Why Does It Matter)? Milano, Italia: Polimetrica.
24. Harvey, L. A. (2007). Digging the Digital Well. Urban, 10(1), 24-26.
25. th Anniversary Conference of the Centre for Urban and Regional Studies, Helsinki University of Technology.
26. Holzer, M., & Seang-Tae, K. (2008). Digital Governance in Municipalities worldwide (2007). A longitudinal assessment of municipal websites throughout the world. Newark, NJ: Rutgers University.
27. Horelli, L. (2002). A methodology of participatory planning. In Bechtel, R., & Churchman, A. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Psychology (pp. 607-628). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
28. Horelli, L. (2003). Valittajista tekijöiksi (From complainers to agents, Adolescents on the arenas of empowerment). Espoo, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology.
29. Horelli, L. (2006). A Learning-based network approach to urban planning with young people. In Spencer, C., & Blades, M. (Eds.), Children and Their Environments: Learning, Using and Designing Spaces (pp. 238-255). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511521232.015
30. Horelli, L. (2009). Network Evaluation from the Everyday Life Perspective. A Tool for Capacity-Building and Voice. Evaluation, 15(2), 205-223. doi:10.1177/1356389008101969
31. Horelli, L., & Wallin, S. (2006). Arjen ajan hallintaa, kokemuksia suomalaisesta aikasuunnittelusta [Mastering of everyday life, Experiences from time planning in Finland]. Helsinki, Finland: Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskus.
32. Horelli, L., & Wallin, S. (2009, June). Gendered community informatics for sustaining a glocal everyday life. Paper presented at the City Futures 09 Conference, Madrid.
33. Horelli, L., Wallin, S., Innamaa, I., & Jarenko, K. (2007). Introduction to the user-sensitive Ubi-Helsinki - a report on the preconditions for the user-sensitive design and its evaluation in the context of commercial, public and community services. Espoo, Finland: Helsinki University of Technology, Centre for Urban and Regional Studies.
34. Inayatullah, S. (2007). Questioning the Future: methods and tools for organizational and societal change. Tamsui, ROC: Tamkang University.
35. Jovero, S., & Horelli, L. (2002). Nuoret ja paikallisuuden merkitys? Nuorten ympäristösuhteen tarkastelua Vantaan Koivukylä-Havukosken alueella (Young people and the meaning of locality). Espoo: TKK/YTK Julkaisuja.
36. Kao, J. (2009). Tapping the World's Innovation Hot Spots. Harvard Business Review, 87(3), 109-114.
37. Kasvio, A., & Anttiroiko, A.-V. (Eds.). (2005). e-City. Analysing efforts to Generate Local Dynamism in the City of Tampere. Tampere, Finland: Tampere University Press.
38. Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn E-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997). Managing Complex Networks: Strategies for the Public Sector. London: Sage.
39. Kingston, R. (2008). The role of participatory e-Planning in the new English Local Planning System. Retrieved December 3, 2008, from http://www.ppgis.man.ac.uk/
40. Koivisto, J. (2008, October). Relational evaluation: A Step forward or a lapse in evaluation practice? Paper presented at the Conference of the European Evaluation Society, Lisbon.
41. Larsen, J., Axhausen, K., & Urry, J. (2006). Geographies of Social Networks: Meetings, Travel and Communications. Mobilities, 1(2), 261-283. doi:10.1080/17450100600726654
42. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Macintosh, A., & Whyte, A. (2007). Towards an evaluation framework for e-participation. In Lippa, B. (Ed.), DEMO-net: Research workshop report - Frameworks and methods for evaluating e-participation (pp. 43-57). Bremen, Germany: IST Network of Excellence Project.
44. Mannermaa, M. (2008). Jokuveli. Elämä ja vaikuttaminen ubiikkiyhteiskunnassa [Some Brother, Life and Participation in the Ubiquitous Society]. Helsinki: WSOYpro.
45. McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. D. (Eds.). (2003). Cyberactivism. Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
46. Medaglia, R. (2007). The challenged identity of a field: The state of the art of eParticipation research. Information Polity, 12(3), 169-181.
47. Metaverse. (2007). Metaverse roadmap foresight framework. Retrieved October 15, 2008, from http://www.metaverseroadmap.org/inputs.html
48. Mitleton-Kelly, E. (2003). Complexity Research - Approaches and Methods: The LSE Complexity Group Integrated Methodology. In A. Keskinen, M. Aaltonen, & E. Mitleton-Kelly (Eds.), Organisational Complexity (pp. 55-74). Turku: Finland Futures Research Centre, Turku School of Economics and Business Administration
49. Mossberger, Karen (2008). Digital citizenship: the internet, society, and participation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Norris, P. (2001). Digital Divide? Civic Engagement, Information Poverty and the Internet Worldwide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
51. OECD. (2002). Public Governance and Management. Definitions and Concepts: E-government. Retrieved December 3, 2008 from http://www.oecd.org/EN/aboutfurther_page/0,EN-about_further_page-300-nodirectorate-no-no--11-no-no1,FF.html
52. Parker, S., & Heapy, J. (2006). The Journey to the Interface. How public service design can connect users to reform. London: Demos.
53. Pessala, H. (2008). Sähköisiä kohtaamisia: Suomalaisten yhteiskunnallinen osallistuminen internetissä Electrical meetings [Societal participation in the internet by Finns]. Helsinki: Helsingin yliopisto, Viestinnän tutkimuskeskus CRC.
54. Rettie, R. (2008). Mobile Phones as Network Capital: Facilitating Connections. Mobilities, 3(2), 291-311. doi:10.1080/17450100802095346
55. Roininen, J. (2009). Alue- ja yhdyskuntasuunnittelun arvioinnin fragmentoitunut luonne ja eheyttäminen [Fragmentation and defragmentation of evaluation in regional and urban planning]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Espoo, Finland: Teknillinen korkeakoulu.
56. Saad-Sulonen, J. (2005). Mediaattori - Urban Mediator: a hybrid infrastructure for neighborhoods. Master of Arts Thesis in New Media, University of Art and Design, Helsinki. Retrieved January 15, 2009 from http://www2.uiah.fi/~jsaadsu/thesis.html
57. Sandercock, L. (2003). Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), 11-28. doi:10.1080/1464935032000057209
58. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing knowledge. Retrieved June1, 2008 from http://www.knowingknowledge.com
59. Taylor, N. (1998). Urban Planning Theory since 1945. London: Sage Publications.
60. Thesaurus. (2009). Governance. Retrieved April 7, 2009 from http://www.answers.com/governance&r=67#Thesaurus
61. Tolbert, C. J., & Mossberger, K. (2006). The Effects of E-Government on Trust and Confidence in Government. Public Administration Review, 66(3), 354-369. doi:10.1111/j.15406210.2006.00594.x
62. Townsend, A. (2009). Foreword. In Foth, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics:The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City (pp. xxii-xxvi). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
63. UN E-Government Readiness Survey. (2008). Retrieved November 30, 2008, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UN/UNPAN028607.pdf
64. Valovirta, V., & Stern, E. (2006, October). The evaluation of new policy instruments. Complexity and governance. Paper presented at the Conference of the European Evaluation Society, London, UK.
65. Vegh, S. (2003). Classifying Forms of Online Activism. The case of Cyberprotests against the World Bank. In McCaughey, M., & Ayers, M. D. (Eds.), Cyberactivism. Online Activism in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.
66. Wallin, S., & Horelli, L. (in press). Methodology of a user-sensitive service design within urban planning. Environment and Planning, B.
67. West, D. M. (2000). Assessing E-Government: The Internet, Democracy, and Service Delivery by State and Federal Governments. Washington, DC: World Bank.
68. Williams, A., Robles, E., & Dourish, P. (2009). Urbaning the City: Examining and refining the assumptions behind urban informatics. In Foth, M. (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City (pp. 1-20). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
69. Zeisel, J. (1981). Inquiry by Design. Tools for Environment-Behavior Research. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.