Educational technology and instructional design in synchronous blended learning environments

Transcultural Blended Learning and Teaching in Postsecondary Education

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 170-192

  Okita, Sandra Y ^a  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898093930     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-2014-8.ch010     Document Type: Chapter

References (24)

1. Bailenson, J. N., Yee, N., Blascovich, J., Beall, A. C., Lundblad, N., & Jin, M. (2008). The use of immersive virtual reality in the learning sciences: Digital transformations of teachers, students, and social context. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 17, 102-141. doi:10.1080/10508400701793141
2. Bargh, J., & Schul, Y. (1980). On the cognitive benefits of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 593-604. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.72.5.593
3. Biswas, G., Schwartz, D. L., Bransford, J. D., & Tag, V. (2001). Technology support for complex problem solving: From SAD environments to AI. In Forbus, K., & Feltovich, P. (Eds.), Smart machines in education (pp. 71-98). Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
4. Chi, M. T. H., Silver, S. A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., & Hausmann, R. G. (2001). Learning from human tutoring. Cognitive Science, 25, 471-533. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog2504_1
5. Colis, B., & Moonen, J. (2001). Flexible learning in a digital world: Experiences and expectations. London, UK: Kogan-Page.
6. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the craft of reading, writing and mathematics. In Resnick, L. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453-494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Collins, M. (1999). I know my instructional technologies: It's these learners that perplex me! American Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 8-23. doi:10.1080/08923649909527011
8. Dede, C., Whitehouse, P., & Brown-L'Bahy, T. (2002) Designing and studying learning experiences that use multiple interactive media to bridge distance and time. In C. Vrasidas & G. Glass (Eds.), Current perspectives on applied information technologies- Vol. 1: Distance education, (pp. 1-30). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.
9. Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. London, UK: Routledge/Falmer. doi:10.4324/9780203166093
10. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148. doi:10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
11. Graesser, A. C., Person, N., & Magliano, J. (1995). Collaborative dialog patterns in naturalistic oneon-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 359-387. doi:10.1002/acp.2350090604
12. Hara, N., & Kling, R. (2001). Student distress in web-based distance education. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 3, 68-69.
13. Hatano, G., & Miyake, N. (1991). What does a cultural approach offer to research on learning? Learning and Instruction, 1, 273-281. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(91)90008-V
14. Klarreich, E. (2006). Crafty geometry: Mathematicians are knitting and crocheting to visualize complex surfaces. Science News, 170, 411-413. doi:10.2307/4017544
15. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
16. Lin, X., & Kinzer, C. K. (2003). The importance of technology for making cultural values visible. Theory into Practice, 42(3), 234-242. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4203_10
17. Marino, T. A. (2000). Learning online: A view from both sides. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 9(4), 4-6.
18. Martyn, M. (2003). The hybrid online model: Good practice. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 1, 18-23.
19. Neff, J. (1998). From a distance: Teaching writing on interactive television. Research in the Teaching of Writing, 33(2), 136-157.
20. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
21. Privateer, P. M. (1999). Academic technology and the future of higher education: Strategic paths taken and not taken. The Journal of Higher Education, 70(1), 60-79. doi:10.2307/2649118
22. Reid, M. (1971). The knitting of surfaces. Eureka. The Journal of the Archimedeans, 34, 21-26.
23. Sikora, A. C., & Carroll, C. D. (2002). Postsecondary education descriptive analysis reports (NCES 2003-154). US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
24. Webb, N. M. (1989). Peer interaction and learning in small groups. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 21-39. doi:10.1016/0883-0355(89)90014-1