|
Volumn 253, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 281-283
|
Science to practice: Why do purely intraductal cancers enhance on breast MR images?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
CONTRAST MEDIUM;
GADOLINIUM;
DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;
ARTICLE;
BIOACCUMULATION;
BREAST CALCIFICATION;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CANCER MODEL;
CANCER SCREENING;
CELL DEATH;
CLINICAL PRACTICE;
DIAGNOSTIC ERROR;
DIAGNOSTIC VALUE;
FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY;
HUMAN;
HYPOXIA;
IMAGE ANALYSIS;
IMAGE ENHANCEMENT;
INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;
PREDICTION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SCIENCE;
TRANSGENIC MOUSE;
X RAY FLUORESCENCE;
ANIMAL;
BREAST TUMOR;
CALCINOSIS;
CANCER INVASION;
FEMALE;
NOTE;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PATHOLOGY;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
ANIMALS;
BREAST NEOPLASMS;
CALCINOSIS;
CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING;
CONTRAST MEDIA;
FEMALE;
GADOLINIUM;
HUMANS;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
MAMMOGRAPHY;
NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS;
SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;
|
EID: 77950173328
PISSN: 00338419
EISSN: 15271315
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2532091401 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (59)
|
References (6)
|