Parametric diffusion tensor imaging of the breast

Investigative Radiology

Volumn 47, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 284-291

  Eyal, Erez ^a   Shapiro Feinberg, Myra ^b   Furman Haran, Edna ^a   Grobgeld, Dov ^a   Golan, Talia ^c   Itzchak, Yacov ^c   Catane, Raphael ^c   Papa, Moshe ^c   Degani, Hadassa ^a  

^a WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^b MEIR MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^c SHEBA MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

breast cancer; DCE MRI; diffusion tensor parameters; DTI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; BREAST TUMOR; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING; FEMALE; FRACTIONAL ANISOTROPY; HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84859890283     PISSN: 00209996     EISSN: 15360210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182438e5d     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Cooper AP. Anatomy of the Breast. Longman, Orme, Green, Browne and Longmans, London 1840.
2. Moffat DF, Going JJ. Three dimensional anatomy of complete duct systems in human breast: pathological and developmental implications. J Clin Pathol. 1996;49:48-52. (Pubitemid 26034146)
3. Ohtake T, Kimijima I, Fukushima T, et al. Computer-assisted complete three-dimensional reconstruction of the mammary ductal/lobular systems: implications of ductal anastomoses for breast-conserving surgery. Cancer. 2001;91:2263-227.
4. Love SM, Barsky SH. Anatomy of the nipple and breast ducts revisited. Cancer. 2004;101:1947-1957. (Pubitemid 39425369)
5. Going JJ, Moffat DF. Escaping from Flatland: clinical and biological aspects of human mammary duct anatomy in three dimensions. J Pathol. 2004;203: 538-544. (Pubitemid 38529033)
6. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:168-175. (Pubitemid 36231622)
7. Turnbull LW. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer: review. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:28-39.
8. Kuhl CK. Current status of breast MR imaging. Part 2. Clinical applications. Radiology. 2007;244:672-691. (Pubitemid 47292079)
9. Moon M, Cornfeld D, Weinreb J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009;17:351-362.
10. Sardanelli F, Boetes C, Borisch B, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. Eur J Cancer. 2010;46:1296-1316.
11. Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F, et al. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk Italian 1 study): final results. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:94-105.
12. Pediconi F, Miglio E, Telesca M, et al. Effect of preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging on surgical decision making and cancer recurrence rates. Invest Radiol. 2012;47:128-135.
13. Saslow D, Boetes B, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin. 2007;57:75-89. (Pubitemid 46535708)
14. Bogner W, Gruber S, Pinker K, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR for differentiation of breast lesions at 3.0 T: how does selection of diffusion protocols affect diagnosis? Radiology. 2009;253:341-351.
15. Partridge SC, DeMartini WB, Kurland BF, et al. Quantitative Diffusionweighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value. AJR. 2009;193:1716-1722.
16. El Khouli RH, Jacobs A, Mezban SD, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging. Radiology. 2010;256:64-73.
17. Belli P, Costantini M, Bufi E, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast lesion evaluation. Radiol Med. 2010;115:51-69.
18. Korteweg MA, Veldhuis WB, Visser F, et al. Feasibility of 7 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging determination of intrinsic sensitivity and highresolution magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, and (1)H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy. Invest Radiol. 2011;46:370-376.
19. Partridge SC, Lorenzo JM, Peacock S, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging of the breast: preliminary clinical findings. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2006; 14:2902.
20. Partridge SC, Ziadloo A, Murthy R, et al. Diffusion tensor MRI: preliminary anisotropy measures and mapping of breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;31:339-347.
21. Baltzer PA, Schafer A, Dietzel M, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: a pilot study. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1-10.
22. Partridge SC, Murthy RS, Ziadloo A, et al. Diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging of the normal breast. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28:320-328.
23. Eyal E, Furman-Haran E, Degani H. 3-D tracking of the mammary ductal tree using diffusion tensor MR imaging. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2008;16: 508.
24. Eyal E, Feinberg-Shapiro M, Furman Haran E, et al. Novel MRI method for breast cancer detection based on diffusion tensor tracking of the ductal trees. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2012;18:362.
25. Furman-Haran E, Eyal E, Shapiro-Feinberg M, et al. Breast cancer detection and diagnosis based on diffusion tensor imaging. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2011;19:515.
26. Le Bihan D, Mangin JF, Poupon C, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging: concepts and applications. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:534-546. (Pubitemid 32231507)
27. Reese TG, Heid O, Weisskoff RM, et al. Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:177-182. (Pubitemid 36042349)
28. Stejskal EO, Tanner JE. Spin diffusion measurements: spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient. J Chem Phys. 1964;42:288-292.
29. American College of Radiology. Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS). Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 1998.
30. Doyley MM, Weaver JB, Van Houten EEW, et al. Thresholds for detecting and characterizing focal lesions using steady-state MR elastography. Med Phys. 2003;30:495-504. (Pubitemid 36443953)
31. Song X, Pogue BW, Jiang S, et al. Automated region detection based on contrast-to-noise ratio in near-infrared tomography. Appl Opt. 2004;43:1053-1062.
32. Furman-Haran E, Degani H. Parametric analysis of breast MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:376-386. (Pubitemid 34564216)
33. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximal likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med. 1998;17:1033-1053. (Pubitemid 28203832)
34. Mori S, van Zijl PC. Fiber tracking: principles and strategies-a technical review. NMTR Biomed. 2002;15:468-480. (Pubitemid 36054510)
35. Jones DK. The effect of gradient sampling schemes on measures derived from diffusion tensor MRI: a Monte Carlo study. Magn Reson Med. 2004;51:807-815. (Pubitemid 38420459)
36. Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:515-525. (Pubitemid 29416213)
37. Skare S, Hedehus M, Moseley ME, et al. Condition number as a measure of noise performance of diffusion tensor data acquisition schemes with MRI. J Magn Reson. 2000;147:340-352.
38. Jones DK. Determining and visualizing uncertainty in estimates of fiber orientation from diffusion tensor MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2003;49:7-12. (Pubitemid 36042328)
39. Farrell JAD, Landman BA, Jones CK, et al. Effects of SNR on the accuracy and reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;26:756-767. (Pubitemid 350194602)
40. Burdette JH, Elster AD, Ricci PE. Calculation of apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in brain using two-point and six-point methods. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998;22:792-794. (Pubitemid 28457744)
41. Papadakis NG, Xing D, Huang CL, et al. A comparative study of acquisition schemes for diffusion tensor imaging using MRI. J Magn Reson. 1999;137: 67-82. (Pubitemid 129608227)
42. Mayr NA, Staples JJ, Robinson RA, et al. Morphometric studies in intraductal breast carcinoma using computerized image analysis. Cancer. 1991;67:2805-2812.
43. Maller O, Martinson H, Schedin P. Extracellular matrix composition reveals complex and dynamic stromal-epithelial interactions in the mammary gland. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia. 2010;15:301-318.
44. Starborg T, Lu Y, Kadler KE, et al. Electron microscopy of collagen fibril structure in vitro and in vivo including three-dimensional reconstruction. Methods Cell Biol. 2008;88:319-345.
45. Reisert M, Weigel M, Eyal E, et al. Diffusion tensor based reconstruction of the ductal tree. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 19 (2011), 1011.