Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on birth certificates: Florida and Massachusetts, 2004-06

Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 181-190

  Cohen, Bruce ^a   Bernson, Dana ^a   Sappenfield, William ^b   Kirby, Russell S ^b   Kissin, Dmitry ^c   Zhang, Yujia ^c   Copeland, Glenn ^d   Zhang, Zi ^e   MacAluso, Maurizio ^f  

^a MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^c CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^d MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY HEALTH   (United States)

^e Center for Information and Systems Engineering   (United States)

^f CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Assisted Reproductive Technology; birth certificates; data quality; validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIRTH; BIRTH CERTIFICATE; DELIVERY; ETHNICITY; FEMALE; FETUS WASTAGE; GOLD STANDARD; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFERTILITY; INFERTILITY THERAPY; LABOR; LABOR COMPLICATION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PARITY; PREDICTION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREMATURE LABOR; RACE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT; BIRTH RATE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH SURVEY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MALE; MULTIPLE PREGNANCY; NEWBORN; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURITY; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELECTION BIAS;

BIRTH CERTIFICATES; BIRTH RATE; FEMALE; FLORIDA; HUMANS; INFANT, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MALE; MASSACHUSETTS; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, MULTIPLE; PREMATURE BIRTH; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SELECTION BIAS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84898010018     PISSN: 02695022     EISSN: 13653016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12110     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Sunderam S, Kissin D, Flowers L, Anderson J, Folger S, Jamieson D, et-al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2009. MMWR Surveillance Summary 2012; 61 (SS7): 1-23.
2. Reynolds MA, Schieve LA, Martin JA, Jeng G, Macaluso M,. Trends in multiple births conceived using assisted reproductive technologies, United States, 1997-2000. Pediatrics 2003; 111: 1159-1162.
3. Boulet SL, Schieve LA, Nannini A, Ferre C, Devine O, Cohen B, et-al. Perinatal outcomes of twin births conceived using assisted reproductive technology: a population-based study. Human Reproduction 2008; 8: 1941-1948.
4. Schieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Macaluso M, Reynolds MA, Wright VC,. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 103: 1144-1153.
5. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu WY, Croughan MS,. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 103: 551-563.
6. Tepper NK, Farrr SL, Cohen BB, Nannini A, Zhang Z, Anderson JE, et-al. Singleton preterm birth: risk factors and association with assisted reproductive technology. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2012; 16: 807-813.
7. Adashi EY, Wyden R,. Public reporting of clinical outcomes of assisted reproductive technology programs: implications for other medical and surgical procedures. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 2011; 306: 1135-1136.
8. Zhang Z, Macaluso M, Cohen B, Schieve L, Nannini A, Chen M, et-al. Accuracy of assisted reproductive technology information on the Massachusetts birth certificate, 1997-2000. Fertility and Sterility 2010; 94: 1657-1661.
9. Sunderam S, Schieve LA, Cohen B, Zhang Z, Jeng G, Reynolds M, et-al. Linking birth and infant death records with assisted reproductive technology data: Massachusetts, 1997-1998. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2006; 10: 115-125.
10. Bureau of Vital Statistics, Florida Department of Health. Preparing the certificate of live birth. In: Vital Records Registration Handbook. History factors for this pregnancy. Editor: Bureau of Vital Statistics. Jacksonville, FL: Bureau of Vital Statistics, 2011; p. 43.
11. Registry of Vital Records and Statistics, Bureau of Health Statistics, Research and Evaluation, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Executive Office of Health and Human Services. Prenatal care: prenatal tests and procedures for this pregnancy. Manual for Completing the Massachusetts Standard Certificate of Live Birth Form R-3. 2001: 40.2.
12. Wright VC, Chang J, Jeng G, Chen M, Macaluso M,. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance-United States, 2004. MMWR Surveillance Summary 2007; 56 (SS06): 1-22.
13. Wright VC, Chang J, Jeng G, Chen M, Macaluso M,. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2005. MMWR Surveillance Summary 2008; 57 (SS05): 1-23.
14. Sunderam S, Chang J, Flowers L, Kulkarni A, Sentelle G, Jeng G, et-al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance-United States, 2006. MMWR Surveillance Summary 2009; 58 (SS05): 1-25.
15. Zhang Y, Cohen B, Macaluso M, Zhang Z, Durant T, Nannini A,. Probabilistic linkage of assisted reproductive technology information with vital records, Massachusetts 1997-2000. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2012; 16: 1703-1708.
16. Kotelchuck M,. The Adequacy of Prenatal Care Utilization Index: its US distribution and association with low birthweight. American Journal of Public Health 1994; 84: 1486-1489.
17. Roohan PJ, Josberger RE, Acar J, Dabir P, Feder HM, Gagliano PJ,. Validation of birth certificate data in New York State. Journal of Community Health 2003; 28: 335-346.
18. Schieve LA, Rosenberg D, Handler A, Rankin K, Reynolds MA,. Validity of self-reported use of assisted reproductive technology treatment among women participating in the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System in five states, 2000. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2006; 10: 427-431.
19. Schieve LA, Devine O, Boyle CA, Petrini JR, Warner L,. Estimation of the contribution of non-assisted reproductive technology ovulation stimulation fertility treatments to US singleton and multiple births. American Journal of Epidemiology 2009; 170: 1396-1407.