Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through assisted reproductive technology in the United States

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 103, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 1144-1153

  Schieve, Laura A ^a   Ferre, Cynthia ^b   Peterson, Herbert B ^b   Macaluso, Maurizio ^b   Reynolds, Meredith A ^b   Wright, Victoria C ^b  

^a CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EMBRYO CULTURE; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMAN; INFANT; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE INFERTILITY; PERINATAL PERIOD; PREMATURE LABOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; ADULT; FEMALE; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; NEWBORN; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MALE; MATERNAL AGE; OBSTETRIC LABOR, PREMATURE; PARITY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, HIGH-RISK; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3042668573     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000127037.12652.76     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology, RESOLVE. 2000 Assisted reproductive technology success rates: national summary and fertility clinic reports. Atlanta (GA): CDC; 2002.
2. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002;346:731-7.
3. Klemetti R, Gissler M, Hemminki E. Comparison of perinatal health of children born from IVF in Finland in the early and late 1990s. Hum Reprod 2002;17:2192-8.
4. Perri T, Chen R, Yoeli R, Merlob P, Orvieto R, Shalev Y, et al. Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity? J Assist Reprod Genet 2001;18:245-9.
5. Wang JX, Norman RJ, Kristiansson P. The effect of various infertility treatments on the risk of preterm birth. Hum Reprod 2002;17:945-9.
6. Westergaard HB, Johansen AM, Erb K, Andersen AN. Danish National In Vitro Fertilization Registry 1994 and 1995: a controlled study of births, malformations and cytogenetic findings. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1896-902.
7. Bergh T, Ericson A, Hillensjo T, Nygren KG, Wennerholm UB. Deliveries and children born after in vitro fertilisation in Sweden 1982-95: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 1999;354:1579-85.
8. Dhont M, De Sutter P, Ruyssinck G, Martens G, Bekaert A. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies after assisted reproduction: a case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999; 181:688-95.
9. Gissler M, Malin Silvero M, Hemminki E. In vitro fertilization pregnancies and perinatal health in Finland 1991-1993. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1856-61.
10. Verlaenen H, Cammu H, Derde MP, Amy JJ. Singleton pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: expectations and outcome. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:906-10.
11. Olivennes F, Rufat P, Andre B, Poourade A, Quiros MC, Frydman R. The increased risk of complication observed in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization (IVF) does not seem to be related to the IVF method itself. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1297-1300.
12. Friedler S, Mashiach S, Laufer N, Births in Israel resulting from in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer, 1982-1989: National Registry of the Israeli Association for Fertility Research. Hum Reprod 1992;7:1159-63.
13. MRC Working Party on Children Conceived by In Vitro Fertilisation. Births in Great Britain resulting from assisted conception, 1978-87. BMJ 1990;300:1229-33.
14. National Center for Health Statistics. Natality Public-Use Tape. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2000.
15. Schieve LA, Cogswell ME, Scanlon KS. An empiric evaluation of the Institute of Medicine's pregnancy weight gain guidelines by race. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:878-84.
16. Buckett WM. A meta-analysis of ultrasound-guided versus clinical touch embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2003;80: 1037-41.
17. Daniel Y, Schreiber L, Geva E, Amit A, Pausner D, Kupferminc MJ, et al. Do placentae of term singleton pregnancies obtained by assisted reproductive technologies differ from those of spontaneously conceived pregnancies? Hum Reprod 1999;14:1107-10.
18. Jauniaux E, Englert Y, Vanesse M, Hiden M, Wilkin P. Pathologic features of placentas from singleton pregnancies obtained by in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol 1990;76:61-4.
19. Wen SW, Kramer MS, Platt R, Demissie K, Joseph KS, Liu S, et al. Secular trends of fetal growth in Canada, 1981 to 1997. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2003;17:347-54.
20. Mitchell AA. Infertility treatment: more risks and challenges. N Engl J Med 2002;346:769-70.
21. Tavaniotou A, Albano C, Smitz J, Devroey P. Impact of ovarian stimulation on corpus luteum function and embryonic implantation. J Reprod Immunol 2002;55:123-30.
22. de Ziegler D, Fanchin R, de Moustier B, Bulletti C. The hormonal control of endometrial receptivity: estrogen (E2) and progesterone. J Reprod Immunol 1998;39:149-66.
23. Barnes FL. The effects of the early uterine environment on the subsequent development of embryo and fetus. Theriogenology 2000;53:649-58.
24. Johnson MR, Riddle AF, Grudzinskas JG, Sharma V, Collins WP, Nicolaides KH. Reduced circulating placental protein concentrations during the first trimester are associated with preterm labour and low birth weight. Hum Reprod 1993;8:1942-7.
25. Haning RV Jr, Goldsmith LT, Seifer DB, Wheeler C, Frishman G, Sarmento J, et al. Relaxin secretion in in vitro fertilization pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;174: 233-40.
26. Weiss G, Goldsmith LT, Sachdev R, Von Hagen S, Lederer K. Elevated first-trimester serum relaxin concentrations in pregnant women following ovarian stimulation predict prematurity risk and preterm delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:821-8.
27. Boiso I, Veiga A, Edwards RG. Fundamentals of human embryonic growth in vitro and the selection of high-quality embryos for transfer. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;5: 328-50.