International continence society guidelines on urodynamic equipment performance

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 370-379

  Gammie, Andrew ^a   Clarkson, Becky ^b   Constantinou, Chris ^c   Damaser, Margot ^d   Drinnan, Michael ^e   Geleijnse, Geert ^f   Griffiths, Derek ^b   Rosier, Peter ^g   Schäfer, Werner ^b   Van Mastrigt, Ron ^f  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e FREEMAN HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^f ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^g UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

specification; standardization; urodynamics

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL PRESSURE; CALIBRATION; CATHETER TIP TRANSDUCER; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTINENCE; ELECTROMYOGRAM; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; FLOWMETER; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PERFORMANCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE TRANSDUCER; REVIEW; URINE VOLUME; URODYNAMICS; URODYNAMICS SYSTEM; UROFLOWMETRY; ARTIFACT; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DEVICES; STANDARDS; UROLOGY;

ARTIFACTS; CALIBRATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT AND SUPPLIES; HUMANS; TRANSDUCERS, PRESSURE; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84897978119     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.22546     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Rowan D, James ED, Kramer AE, et al. Urodynamic equipment: Technical aspects. produced by the international continence society working party on urodynamic equipment. J Med Eng Technol 1987; 11: 57-64.
2. Rosier PF, de Ridder D, Meijlink J, et al. Developing evidence-based standards for diagnosis and management of lower urinary tract or pelvic floor dysfunction. Neurourol Urodyn 2012; 31: 621-4.
3. Schafer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry, and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 261-74.
4. Parsons BA, Bright E, Shaban AM, et al. The role of invasive and non-invasive urodynamics in male voiding lower urinary tract symptoms. World J Urol 2011; 29: 191-7.
5. Griffiths CJ, Pickard RS,. Review of invasive urodynamics and progress towards non-invasive measurements in the assessment of bladder outlet obstruction. Indian J Urol 2009; 25: 83-91.
6. Rosier PF, de la Rosette JJ, Koldewijn EL, et al. Variability of pressure-flow analysis parameters in repeated cystometry in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 1995; 153: 1520-5.
7. Hansen F, Olsen L, Atan A, et al. Pressure-flow studies: An evaluation of within-testing reproducibility-validity of the measured parameters. Neurourol Urodyn 1997; 16: 521-32.
8. Boci R, Fall M, Walden M, et al. Home uroflowmetry: Improved accuracy in outflow assessment. Neurourol Urodyn 1999; 18: 25-32.
9. van Mastrigt R, Koopal JW, Hak J, et al. Modeling the contractility of urinary bladder smooth muscle using isometric contractions. Am J Physiol 1986; 251: R978-83.
10. van Mastrigt R, Griffiths DJ,. An evaluation of contractility parameters determined from isometric contractions and micturition studies. Urol Res 1986; 14: 45-52.
11. Zinner NR, Ritter RC, Sterling AM, et al. Drop spectrometer: A non-obstructive, non-interfering instrument for analyzing hydrodynamic properties of human urination. J Urol 1969; 101: 914-8.
12. Evaluation Report: Urodynamics Systems CEP09038. Centre for Evidence-based Purchasing. London: NHS Purchasing and Supply Agency; 2009.
13. Griffiths CJ, Murray A, Ramsden PD,. A simple uroflowmeter tester. Br J Urol 1983; 55: 21-4.
14. Kranse R, van Mastrigt R, Bosch R,. Estimation of the lag time between detrusor pressure- and flow rate-signals. Neurourol Urodyn 1995; 14: 217-29.
15. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The Standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 167-78.
16. Klevmark B,. Natural pressure-volume curves and conventional cystometry. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 1999; 201: 1-4.
17. Hellstrom PA, Tammela TL, Kontturi MJ, et al. The bladder cooling test for urodynamic assessment: Analysis of 400 examinations. Br J Urol 1991; 67: 275-9.
18. Thind P, Bagi P, Lose G, et al. Characterization of pressure changes in the lower urinary tract during coughing with special reference to the demands on the pressure recording equipment. Neurourol Urodyn 1994; 13: 219-25.
19. Kim K, Jurnalov CD, Ham S, et al. Mechanisms of female urinary continence under stress: Frequency spectrum analysis. J Biomech 2001; 34: 687-91.
20. Cooper MA, Fletter PC, Zaszczurynski PJ, et al. Comparison of air-charged and water-filled urodynamic pressure measurement catheters. Neurourol Urodyn 2011; 30: 329-34.
21. Gammie A, Drake M, Swithinbank L, et al. Absolute versus relative pressure. Neurourol Urodyn 2009; 28: 468.
22. Enhorning GE,. A concept of urinary continence. Urol Int 1976; 31: 3-5.
23. Lose G, Griffiths D, Hosker G, et al. Standardisation of urethral pressure measurement: Report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002; 21: 258-60.
24. Brown M, Wickham JE,. The urethral pressure profile. Br J Urol 1969; 41: 211-7.
25. van Mastrigt R, Griffiths DJ,. ICS standard for digital exchange of urodynamic study data. Neurourol Urodyn 2004; 23: 280-1.
26. Hogan S, Jarvis P, Gammie A, et al. Quality control in urodynamics and the role of software support in the QC procedure. Neurourol Urodyn 2011; 30: 1557-64.
27. Wyndaele JJ, Gammie A, Bruschini H, et al. Bladder compliance what does it represent: Can we measure it, and is it clinically relevant?. Neurourol Urodyn 2011; 30: 714-22.
28. Hok B,. Dynamic calibration of manometer systems. Med Biol Eng 1976; 14: 193-8.