Absolute versus relative pressure

Neurourology and Urodynamics

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 468-

  Gammie, Andrew ^a   Drake, Marcus ^a   Swithinbank, Lucy ^a   Abrams, Paul ^a  

^a SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTIFACT; BLADDER PRESSURE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GOOD CLINICAL PRACTICE; LETTER; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY CONTROL; STANDARDIZATION; URINARY CATHETER; URODYNAMICS; VESICOURETERAL REFLUX;

DIAGNOSTIC TECHNIQUES, UROLOGICAL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PRESSURE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; URINARY BLADDER DISEASES; URINATION DISORDERS; URODYNAMICS;

EID: 67649962238     PISSN: 07332467     EISSN: 15206777     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nau.20716     Document Type: Letter

References (2)

1. www.pasa.nhs.uk/cep report CEP08045 published 17/12/08.
2. Schäfer W, Abrams P, Liao L, et al. Good urodynamic practices: Uroflowmetry, filling cystometry and pressure-flow studies. Neurourol Urodynam 2002;21: 261-274.