KeraSkin™-VM: A novel reconstructed human epidermis model for skin irritation tests

Toxicology in Vitro

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 742-750

  Jung, Kyoung Mi ^a   Lee, Su Hyon ^b   Jang, Won Hee ^a   Jung, Haeng Sun ^b   Heo, Yong ^c   Park, Young Ho ^a   Bae, SeungJin ^d   Lim, Kyung Min ^d   Seok, Seung Hyeok ^e  

^a AmorePacific Corporation   (South Korea)

^b Modern Cell and Tissue Technologies Inc   (South Korea)

^c Catholic University of Daegu   (South Korea)

^d Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

^e Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Keraskin VM; Reconstructed human skin; Sensitivity; Skin irritation; Specificity

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GROWTH CURVE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERASKIN MODEL; PREDICTION; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCREENING TEST; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN IRRITATION MODEL; SKIN STRUCTURE; SKIN SURFACE; SKIN TEST; VALIDATION PROCESS; DRUG EFFECTS; EPIDERMIS; HUMAN; IN VITRO STUDY; MALE; PREPUCE; PROCEDURES; TOXICITY; TOXICITY TESTING;

IRRITANT AGENT;

EPIDERMIS; FORESKIN; HUMANS; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; IRRITANTS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKIN IRRITANCY TESTS;

EID: 84897939451     PISSN: 08872333     EISSN: 18793177     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2014.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Alépée N., Tornier C., Robert C., Amsellem C., Roux M.H., Doucet O., Pachot J., Méloni M., de Brugerolle de Fraissinette A. A catch-up validation study on reconstructed human epidermis (SkinEthic RHE) for full replacement of the Draize skinirritation test. Toxicol. In Vitro 2010, 24(1):257-266.
2. Benassi L., Bertazzoni G., Seidenari S. In vitro testing of tensides employing monolayer cultures: a comparison with results of patch tests on human volunteers. Contact Dermatitis 1999, 40(1):38-44.
3. Jirova Dagmar, Liebsch Manfred, Basketter David, Spiller Erin, Kejlova Kristina, Bendova Hana, Marriott Marie, Kandarova Helena Comparison of human skin irritation and photo-irritation patch test data with cellular in vitro assays and animal in vivo data. AATEX 2007, 14:359-365.
4. EC-ECVAM Performance Standards for in vitro skin irritation test methods based on Reconstructed human Epidermis (RhE), 2009a. Available at: N.B. This is the current version of the ECVAM PS, updated in 2009 in view of the implementation of UN GHS. http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_activities/alt-animal-testing.
5. EC-ECVAM ESAC Statement on the Performance Standards (PS) for in vitro skin irritation testing using Reconstructed human Epidermis, issued by the ECVAM Scientific Advisory Committee (ESAC31), 2009b. Available at:. http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_activities/alt-animal-testing.
6. Fentem J.H., Briggs D., Chesné C., Elliott G.R., Harbell J.W., Heylings J.R., Portes P., Roguet R., Van de Sandt J.J., Botham P.A. A prevalidation study on in vitro tests for acute skin irritation: results and evaluation by the Management Team. Toxicol. In Vitro 2001, 15(1):57-93.
7. Kandárová H., Hayden P., Klausner M., Kubilus J., Kearney P., Sheasgreen J. In vitro skin irritation testing: improving the sensitivity of the EpiDerm skin irritation test protocol. Altern. Lab. Anim. 2009, 37(6):671-689.
8. Katoh M., Hamajima F., Ogasawara T., Hata K. Assessment of human epidermal model LabCyte EPI-MODEL for in vitro skin irritation testing according to European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM)-validated protocol. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2009, 34(3):327-334.
9. Perkins M.A., Osborne R., Rana F.R., Ghassemi A., Robinson M.K. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo human skin responses to consumer products and ingredients with a range of irritancy potential. Toxicol. Sci. 1999, 48(2):218-229.
10. Poumay Y., Coquette A. Modelling the human epidermis in vitro: tools for basic and applied research. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 2007, 298:361-369.
11. Purchase I.F. Prospects for reduction and replacement alternatives in regulatory toxicology. Toxicol. In Vitro 1997, 11:313-319.
12. Roguet R., Cohen C., Dossou K.G., Rougier A. Episkin a reconstituted human epidermis for assessing in vitro the irritancy of topically applied compounds. Toxicol. In Vitro 1994, 8(2):283-291.
13. Rosdy M., Clauss L.C. Terminal epidermal differentiation of human keratinocytes grown in chemically defined medium on inert filter substrates at the air-liquid interface. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1990, 95(4):409-414.
14. Stobbe J.L., Drake K.D., Maier K.J. Comparison of in vivo (Draize method) and in vitro (Corrositex assay) dermal corrosion values for selected industrial chemicals. Int. J. Toxicol. 2003, 22(2):99-107.
15. York M., Griffiths H.A., Whittle E., Basketter D.A. Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification and classification of skin irritation potential. Contact Dermatitis 1996, 32:204-212.