Tuning research competences for Bologna three cycles in medicine: report of a MEDINE2 European consensus survey

Perspectives on Medical Education

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 181-195

  Marz, Richard ^a   Dekker, Friedo W ^b   Van Schravendijk, Chris ^c   O’Flynn, Siun ^d   Ross, Michael T ^e  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c DIABETES RESEARCH CENTER   (Belgium)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE CORK   (Ireland)

^e UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bologna process; Learning outcomes; Medical curricula; Research competences; Tuning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897900193     PISSN: 22122761     EISSN: 2212277X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40037-013-0066-z     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Laskowitz DT, Drucker RP, Parsonnet J, Cross PC, Gesundheit N. Engaging students in dedicated research and scholarship during medical school: the long-term experiences at Duke and Stanford. Acad Med. 2010;85(3):419–28.
2. Bologna Process—European Higher Education Area (EHEA). 2010. http://www.ehea.info/. Accessed 14 Mar 2013.
3. ORPHEUS/AMSE/WFME Task Force. Standards for PhD Education in Biomedicine and Health Sciences in Europe2012. Report No.: 978 87 7934 600 0. http://www.wfme.org/standards/phd/doc_download/57-standards-for-phd-education-in-biomedicine-and-health-sciences-in-europe. Accessed 5 Mar 2013.
4. Cumming A, Ross M. The Tuning Project (medicine)—learning outcomes/competences for undergraduate medical education in Europe. Edinburgh: The University of Edinburgh; 2008. http://www.tuning-medicine.com/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013.
5. Dekker FW. Science education in medical curriculum: teaching science or training scientists? Med Sci Educ. 2011;21(3S):258–60.
6. Riley SC, Gibbs TJ, Ferrell WR, Nelson PR, Smith WC, Murphy MJ. Getting the most out of student selected components: 12 tips for participating students. Med Teach. 2009;31(10):895–902.
7. O’Tuathaigh CM, Duggan E, Khashan AS, Boylan GB, O’Flynn S. Selection of student-selected component [SSCs] modules across the medical undergraduate curriculum: relationship with motivational factors. Med Teach. 2012;34(10):813–20.
8. Burgoyne LN, O’Flynn S, Boylan GB. Undergraduate medical research: the student perspective. Med Educ Online. 2010;15. doi:10.3402/meo.v15i0.5212.
9. Frishman WH. Student research projects and theses: should they be a requirement for medical school graduation? Heart Dis. 2001;3(3):140–4.
10. Edwards SJ. Student projects in medicine: a lesson in science and ethics. Account Res. 2009;16(6):285–306.
11. British Medical Association. Academic medicine in the NHS: driving innovation and improving healthcare. London: British Medical Association; 2008.
12. Ley TJ, Rosenberg LE. The physician–scientist career pipeline in 2005: build it, and they will come. JAMA. 2005;294(11):1343–51.
13. MEDINE Thematic Network Website. 2007. http://www.medine2.com/archive/medine1. Accessed 1 Mar 2013.
14. Van Schravendijk C, Marz R, Garcia-Seoane J. Exploring the integration of the biomedical research component in undergraduate medical education. Med Teach. 2013;35(2):e1–9.
15. Van Schravendijk C, Marz R, Seoane J, Arslan P, Halasova E, Roald B, et al. Full report of MEDINE TF-5: exploring and developing links between medical education and research: MEDINE Thematic Network. 2007. http://minf.vub.ac.be/chrisvs/tf5report.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2013.
16. Tuning Project website. www.unideusto.org/tuningeu. Accessed 15 Mar 2013.
17. MEDINE2 Thematic Network Website. http://www.medine2.com/. Accessed 1 Mar 2013.
18. Cumming A, Ross M. The Tuning Project for Medicine—learning outcomes for undergraduate medical education in Europe. Med Teach. 2007;29(7):636–41.
19. Karle H. WFME global standards for quality improvement in medical education. European specification. For basic and postgraduate medical education and continuing professional development: WFME Office. Denmark: University of Copenhagen; 2007.
20. General Medical Council UK. Tomorrow’s doctors: outcomes and standards for undergraduate medical education. London: The General Medical Council; 2009. http://www.gmc-uk.org/publications/medical_education_publications.asp-1. Accessed 5 Mar 2013.
21. Council on Graduate Medical Education. Physician education for a changing health care environment. COGME Rep. 1998;13:1–60.
22. AAMC. ACME-TRI Report. Educating medical students: assessing change in medical education—the road to implementation; 1993.
23. Scottish Deans Medical Education Group. The Scottish Doctor: learning outcomes for the medical undergraduate in Scotland: a foundation for competent and reflective practitioners. Edinburgh: Scottish Deans Medical Education Group; 2009.
24. Metz JCM, Verbeek-Weel AMM, Huisjes HJ. Blueprint 2001—training of Doctors in the Netherlands: adjusted objectives of undergraduate medical education. Nijmegen: University of Nijmegen; 2001.
25. Swiss Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Training—Working Group under a Mandate of the Joint Commission of the Swiss Medical Schools. 2008. http://sclo.smifk.ch/sclo2008/. Accessed 5 Mar 2013.
26. Frank JR. The CanMEDS 2005 physician competency framework. Better standards. Better physicians. Better care. Ottawa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada; 2005.
27. SurveyMonkey [database on the Internet]. http://www.surveymonkey.com. Accessed 1 Mar 2013.
28. Leik RK. A measure of ordinal consensus. Pac Sociol Rev. 1966;9(2):85–90.
29. Murdoch-Eaton D, Ellershaw J, Garden A, Newble D, Perry M, Robinson L, et al. Student-selected components in the undergraduate medical curriculum: a multi-institutional consensus on purpose. Med Teach. 2004;26(1):33–8.
30. Nikkar-Esfahani A, Jamjoom AA, Fitzgerald JE. Extracurricular participation in research and audit by medical students: opportunities, obstacles, motivation and outcomes. Med Teach. 2012;34(5):e317–24.
31. Laidlaw A, Aiton J, Struthers J, Guild S. Developing research skills in medical students: AMEE Guide No. 69. Med Teach. 2012;34(9):754–71.
32. Duggan ED, O’Flynn S, O’Tuathaigh CM. Providing research opportunities for medical students: challenges and opportunities. J Int Assoc Med Sci Educ. 2013;23(1S):117–25.
33. Irish Medical Council. Professional competence—promoting quality assurance 2009.
34. ACfGME. Educational program, residents’ scholarly activities, common program requirements. 2011. http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/dh_dutyhoursCommonPR07012007.pdf; http://www.acgme.org/acgmeweb/Portals/0/PDFs/commonguide/IVB123_EducationalProgram_ResidentScholarlyActivity_Explanation.pdf. Accessed 1 Mar 2013.
35. Coles C. Curriculum development in learning medicine. In: Dornan T, Mann K, Scherpbier A, Spencer J, editors. Medical education theory and practice. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2011. p. 79–95.
36. Stenhouse L. An introduction to curriculum development and research. London: Heinemann Educational Publishers; 1975. Report No.: 0435808516.