Extrafloral nectaries of associated trees can enhance natural pest control

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 188, Issue , 2014, Pages 198-203

  Rezende, M Q ^a   Venzon, M ^b   Perez, A L ^a   Cardoso, I M ^a   Janssen, Arne ^c  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF VIÇOSA   (Brazil)

^b EMPRESA DE PESQUISA AGROPECUÁRIA DE MINAS GERAIS EPAMIG   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Agroforestry systems; Associational defence; Hypothenemus hampei; Inga subnuda subsp. Luschnathiana; Leucoptera coffeella; Natural enemies

Indexed keywords

ABUNDANCE; CORRELATION; FLORA; HERBIVORY; NATURAL ENEMY; NECTAR; PEST CONTROL; PEST DAMAGE; SPECIES RICHNESS; TREE;

EID: 84897899392     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.02.024     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Ab'Sáber A.N. Os domímios de natureza no Brasil: potencialidades paisagísticas 2003, Ateliê Editorial, São Paulo, Brasil.
2. Armbrecht I., Perfecto I. Litter-twig dwelling ant species richness and predation potential within a forest fragment and neighboring coffee plantations of contrasting habitat quality in Mexico. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2003, 97:107-115.
3. Atsatt P.R., O'Dowd D.J. Plant defense guilds. Science 1976, 193:24-29.
4. Barbosa P., Hines J., Kaplan I., Martinson H., Szczepaniec A., Szendrei Z. Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2009, 40:1-20.
5. Bentley B.L. Extra-floral nectaries and protection by pugnacious bodyguards. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 1977, 8:407-427.
6. Bianchi F.J.J.A., Booij C.J.H., Tscharntke T. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. Proc. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 2006, 273:1715-1727.
7. Brown M.W., Mathews C.R. Conservation biological control of spirea aphid. Aphis spiraecola (Hemiptera: Aphididae) on apple by providing natural alternative food resources. Eur. J. Entomol. 2008, 105:537-540.
8. Brown M.W., Mathews C.R., Krawczyk G. Extrafloral nectar in an apple ecosystem to enhance biological control. J. Econ. Entomol. 2010, 103:1657-1664.
9. Cardoso I.M., Guijt I., Franco F.S., Carvalho A.F., Ferreira Neto P.S. Continual learning for agroforestry system design: university, NGO and farmer partnership in Minas Gerais, Brazil. Agric. Syst. 2001, 69:235-257.
10. Crawley M.J. The R Book 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
11. Cuautle M., Rico-Gray V. The effect of wasps and ants on the reproductive success of the extrafloral nectaried plant Turnera ulmifolia (Turneraceae). Funct. Ecol. 2003, 17:417-423.
12. ENGEVIX Caracterização do meio físico da área autorizada para criação do Parque Estadual da Serra do Brigadeiro 1995, 34. Instituto Estadual de Floresta, Bird/Pró-Floresta/SEPLA.
13. Golfari L. Zoneamento ecológico do estado de Minas Gerais para reflorestamento 1975, CPFRC, Belo Horizonte.
14. Gonthier D.J., Ennis K.K., Philpott S.M., Vandermeer J., Perfecto I. Ants defend coffee from berry borer colonization. BioControl 2013, 58:815-820.
15. Gurr G. Multi-function agricultural biodiversity: pest management and other benefits. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2003, 4:107-116.
16. Heil M. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions. New Phytol. 2008, 178:41-61.
17. Heil M., Koch T., Hilpert A., Fiala B., Boland W., Linsenmair K.E. Extrafloral nectar production of the ant-associated plant. Macaranga tanarius, is an induced, indirect, defensive response elicited by jasmonic acid. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001, 98:1083-1088.
18. Jamont M., Crepelliere S., Jaloux B. Effect of extrafloral nectar provisioning on the performance of the adult parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae. Biol. Control 2013, 65:271-277.
19. Jervis M. Functional and evolutionary aspects of mouthpart structure in parasitoid wasps. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 1998, 63:461-493.
20. Jezorek H., Stiling P., Carpenter J. Ant predation on an invasive herbivore: can an extrafloral nectar-producing plant provide associational resistance to Opuntia individuals?. Biol. Invasions 2011, 13:2261-2273.
21. Koptur S. Experimental evidence for defense of Inga (Mimosoideae) saplings by ants. Ecology 1984, 65:1787-1793.
22. Koptur S. Alternative defenses against herbivores in Inga (Fabaceae: Mimosoideae) over an elevational gradient. Ecology 1985, 66:1639-1650.
23. Koptur S. Nectar as fuel for plant protectors. Plant-provided Food for Carnivorous Insects: A Protective Mutualism and Its Applications 2005, 75-108. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. F.L. Wäckers, P.C.J. Van Rijn, J. Bruin (Eds.).
24. Kost C., Heil M. Increased availability of extrafloral nectar reduces herbivory in Lima bean plants (Phaseolus lunatus, Fabaceae). Basic Appl. Ecol. 2005, 6:237-248.
25. Landis D.A., Menalled F.D., Costamagna A.C., Wilkinson T.K. Manipulating plant resources to enhance beneficial arthropods in agricultural landscapes. Weed Sci. 2005, 53:902-908.
26. Landis D.A., Wratten S.D., Gurr G.M. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2000, 45:175-201.
27. Langellotto G., Denno R. Responses of invertebrate natural enemies to complex-structured habitats: a meta-analytical synthesis. Oecologia 2004, 139:1-10.
28. Lavandero B., Wratten S., Shishehbor P., Worner S. Enhancing the effectiveness of the parasitoid Diadegma semiclausum (Helen): movement after use of nectar in the field. Biol. Control 2005, 34:152-158.
29. Le Pelley R.H. Coffee insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1973, 18:121-142.
30. Letourneau D.K., Armbrecht I., Salguero Rivera B., Montoya Lerma J., Jimenez Carmona E., Constanza Daza M., Escobar S., Galindo V., Gutierrez C., Duque Lopez S., Lopez Mejia J., Acosta Rangel A.M., Herrera Rangel J., Rivera L., Arturo Saavedra C., Marina Torres A., Reyes Trujillo A. Does plant diversity benefit agroecosystems? A synthetic review. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:9-21.
31. Lewis W.J., Stapel J.O., Cortesero A.M., Takasu K. Understanding how parasitoids balance food and host needs: importance to biological control. Biol. Control 1998, 11:175-183.
32. Lomeli-Flores R.J., Barrera J.F., Bernal J.S. Impacts of weather, shade cover and elevation on coffee leafminer Leucoptera coffeella (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) population dynamics and natural enemies. Crop Prot. 2010, 29:1039-1048.
33. Mathews C.R., Brown M.W., Bottrell D.G. Leaf extrafloral nectaries enhance biological control of a key economic pest. Grapholita molesta (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), in peach (Rosales: Rosaceae). Environ. Entomol. 2007, 36:383-389.
34. Ness J.H. Catalpa bignonioides alters extrafloral nectar production after herbivory and attracts ant bodyguards. Oecologia 2003, 134:210-218.
35. Nicolson S.W. Nectar consumers. Nectaries and Nectar 2007, 289-342. Springer, Dordrecht. S.W. Nicolson, M. Nepi, E. Pacini (Eds.).
36. Pacini E., Nepi M. Nectar production and presentation. Nectaries and Nectar 2007, 167-214. Springer, Dordrecht. S.W. Nicolson, M. Nepi, E. Pacini (Eds.).
37. Pardee G.L., Philpott S.M. Cascading indirect effects in a coffee agroecosystem: effects of parasitic phorid flies on ants and the coffee berry borer in a high-shade and low-shade habitat. Environ. Entomol. 2011, 40:581-588.
38. Pemberton R.W., Lee J.H. The influence of extrafloral nectaries on parasitism of an insect herbivore. Am. J. Bot. 1996, 83:1187-1194.
39. Pereira E.J.G., Picanço M.C., Bacci L., Crespo A.L.B., Guedes R.N.C. Seasonal mortality factors of the coffee leafminer Leucoptera coffeella. Bull. Entomol. Res. 2007, 97:421-432.
40. Philpott S.M., Arendt W.J., Armbrecht I., Bichier P., Diestch T.V., Gordon C., Greenberg R., Perfecto I., Reynoso-Santos R., Soto-Pinto L., Tejeda-Cruz C., Williams-Linera G., Valenzuela J., Zolotoff J.M. Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees. Conserv. Biol. 2008, 22:1093-1105.
41. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., 2010. Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-97, 339.
42. R Development Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2011, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
43. Rosumek F.B., Silveira F.A.O., Neves F.d.S., Barbosa N.P.d.U., Diniz L., Oki Y., Pezzini F., Fernandes G.W., Cornelissen T. Ants on plants: a meta-analysis of the role of ants as plant biotic defenses. Oecologia 2009, 160:537-549.
44. Rudgers J.A., Gardener M.C. Extrafloral nectar as a resource mediating multispecies interactions. Ecology 2004, 85:1495-1502.
45. Sabelis M.W., van Rijn P.C.J., Janssen A. Fitness consequences of food-for-protection strategies in plants. Plant-provided Food for Carnivorous Insects 2005, 109-134. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. F.L. Wäckers, P.C.J. Rijn, V. Bruin (Eds.).
46. Schilman P.E., Roces F. Assessment of nectar flow rate and memory for patch quality in the ant Camponotus rufipes. Anim. Behav. 2003, 66:687-693.
47. Soto-Pinto L., Villalvazo-López V., Jiménez-Ferrer G., Ramírez-Marcial N., Montoya G., Sinclair F. The role of local knowledge in determining shade composition of multistrata coffee systems in Chiapas, Mexico. Biodiversity Conserv. 2007, 16:419-436.
48. Souza H.N., Cardoso I.M., Fernandes J.M., Garcia F.C.P., Bonfim V.R., Santos A.C., Carvalho A.F., Mendonça E.S. Selection of native trees for intercropping with coffee in the Atlantic Rainforest biome. Agroforestry Syst. 2010, 80:1-16.
49. Souza J.C., Reis P.R. Broca do café: histórico, reconhecimento, biologia, prejuízos, monitoramento e controle 1997, Epamig, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
50. Souza J.C., Reis P.R., Rigitano R.L.d.O. Bicho-mineiro do cafeeiro: biologia, danos e manejo integrado 1998, EPAMIG, Belo Horizonte, Brasil.
51. Spellman B., Brown M.W., Mathews C.R. Effect of floral and extrafloral resources on predation of Aphis spiraecola by Harmonia axyridis on Apple. BioControl 2006, 51:715-724.
52. Teodoro A., Klein A.M., Reis P.R., Tscharntke T. Agroforestry management affects coffee pests contingent on season and developmental stage. Agric. Forest Entomol. 2009, 11:295-300.
53. Teodoro A., Mein A.-M., Tscharntke T. Environmentally mediated coffee pest densities in relation to agroforestry management, using hierarchical partitioning analyses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 125:120-126.
54. Tscharntke T., Clough Y., Bhagwat S.A., Buchori D., Faust H., Hertel D., Hölscher D., Juhrbandt J., Kessler M., Perfecto I., Scherber C., Schroth G., Veldkamp E., Wanger T.C. Multifunctional shade-tree management in tropical agroforestry landscapes - a review. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:619-629.
55. Tylianakis J.M., Didham R.K., Wratten S.D. Improved fitness of aphid parasitoids receiving resource subsidies. Ecology 2004, 85:658-666.
56. Van Rijn P.C.J., Van Houten Y.M., Sabelis M.W. How plants benefit from providing food to predators even when it is also edible to herbivores. Ecology 2002, 83:2664-2679.
57. Vandermeer J., Perfecto I., Philpott S. Ecological complexity and pest control in organic coffee production: uncovering an autonomous ecosystem service. Bioscience 2010, 60:527-537.
58. Vega F.E., Infante F., Castillo A., Jaramillo J. The coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): a short review, with recent findings and future research directions. Terrestrial Arthropod Rev. 2009, 2:129-147.
59. Wäckers F.L. Suitability of (extra-) floral nectar, pollen, and honeydew as insect food sources. Plant-provided Food for Carnivorous Insects: A Protective Mutualism and Its Applications 2005, 17-74. Cambridge University Press. F.L. Wäckers, P.C.J. van Rijn, J. Bruin (Eds.).
60. Whitney K.D. Experimental evidence that both parties benefit in a facultative plant-spider mutualism. Ecology 2004, 85:1642-1650.