Environmentally mediated coffee pest densities in relation to agroforestry management, using hierarchical partitioning analyses

Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment

Volumn 125, Issue 1-4, 2008, Pages 120-126

  Teodoro, Adenir ^a   Klein, Alexandra Maria ^a   Tscharntke, Teja ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abiotic and biotic habitat variables; Berry borers; Leaf miners; Spider mites

Indexed keywords

AGROFORESTRY; COFFEE; HABITAT TYPE; MITE; PEST OUTBREAK; POPULATION DENSITY; SPECIES-AREA RELATIONSHIP; PEST SPECIES;

ACARI; AGROMYZIDAE; ARANEAE; TETRANYCHIDAE;

ECUADOR; SOUTH AMERICA;

EID: 40849116614     PISSN: 01678809     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2007.12.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anonymous, 2001. Statgraphics Plus for Windows, version 5.1. Manugistics, Rockville, MD, USA.
2. Bonato O., Mapangou-Divassa S., and Gutierrez J. Influence of relative humidity on life-history parameters of Mononychellus progresivus and Oligonychus gossypii (Acari: Tetranychidae). Popul. Ecol. 24 (1995) 841-845
3. Broufas G.D., and Koveos D.S. Development, survival and reproduction of Euseius finlandicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae) at different constant temperatures. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 25 (2001) 441-460
4. Cushman S.A., and McGarigal K. Hierarchical analysis of forest bird species-environment relationships in the oregon coast range. Ecol. Appl. 14 (2004) 1090-1105
5. De Vis R.M.J., De Moraes G.J., and Bellini M.R. Effect of air humidity on the egg viability of predatory mites (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Stigmaeidae) common on rubber trees in Brazil. Exp. Appl. Acarol. 38 (2006) 25-32
6. Gotoh T., Suwa A., Kitashima Y., and Rezek H.A. Developmental and reproductive performance of Tetranychus pueraricola Ehara and Gotoh (Acari: Tetranychidae) at four constant temperatures. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 39 (2004) 675-682
7. Gotoh T., Yamaguchi K., and Mori K. Effect of the temperature on life history of the predatory mite Amblyseius (Neoseilus) californicus (Acari: Phytoseiidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol. 32 (2004) 15-30
8. Heikkinen R.K., Luoto M., Virkkala R., and Rainio K. Effects of habitat cover, landscape structure and spatial variables on the abundance of birds in an agricultural-forest mosaic. J. Appl. Ecol. 41 (2004) 824-835
9. Heikkinen R.K., Luoto M., Kuussaari M., and Pöyry J. New insights into butterfly-environment relationships using partitioning methods. Proc. R. Soc. B 272 (2005) 2203-2210
10. Hofmann T.A., and Mason C.F. Importance of management on the distribution and abundance of Staphylinidae (insecta: coleoptera) on coastal grazing marshes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 114 (2006) 397-406
11. Klein A.M., Stefan-Dewenter I., Buchori D., and Tscharntke T. Effects of land-use intensity in tropical agroforestry systems on coffee flower-visiting and trap-nesting bees and wasps. Conserv. Biol. 16 (2002) 1003-1014
12. Landis D.A., Wratten S.D., and Gurr G.M. Habitat management to conserve natural enemies of arthropod pests in agriculture. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 45 (2000) 175-201
13. Le Pelley R.H. Coffee insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 18 (1973) 121-142
14. Lozada T., de Koning G.H.J., Marché R., Klein A.M., and Tscharntke T. Tree recovery and seed dispersal by birds, comparing forest, agroforestry and abandoned agroforestry in coastal Ecuador. Perspect. Plant Ecol. Evol. Syst. 8 (2007) 131-140
15. Luoto M., Heikkinen R.K., Pöyry J., and Saarinen K. Determinants of the biogeographical distribution of butterflies in boreal regions. J. Biogeogr. 33 (2006) 1764-1778
16. Luoto M., Virkkala R., and Heikkinen R.K. The role of land cover in bioclimatic models depends on spatial resolution. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 16 (2007) 34-42
17. Mc Nally R. Hierarchical partitioning as an interpretative tool in multivariate inference. Aust. J. Ecol. 21 (1996) 224-228
18. Mc Nally R. Regression and model-building in conservation biology, biogeography and ecology: The distinction between - and reconciliation of - "predictive" and explanatory models. Biodivers. Conserv. 9 (2000) 655-671
19. Mc Nally R., and Walsh C.J. Hierarchical partitioning public-domain software. Biodivers. Conserv. 13 (2004) 659-660
20. Mcneely J.A., and Schroth G. Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation-traditional practices, present dynamics, and lessons for the future. Biodivers. Conserv. 15 (2006) 549-554
21. Miller J.R., Dixon M.D., and Turner M.G. Response of avian communities in large-river floodplains to environmental variation at multiple scales. Ecol. Appl. 14 (2004) 1394-1410
22. Moguel P., and Toledo W.M. Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv. Biol. 13 (1999) 11-21
23. Murphy S.T., and Moore D. Biological control of the coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae): previous programmes and possibilities for the future. Biocontrol News Inf. 11 (1990) 107-117
24. Nestel D., Dickschen F., and Altieri M.A. Seasonal and spatial population loads of a tropical insect: the case of the coffee leaf-miner in Mexico. Ecol. Entomol. 19 (1994) 159-167
25. Perfecto I., Rice R.A., Greenberg R., and Van der Voort M.E. Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Shade coffee plantations can contain as much biodiversity as forest habitats. Bioscience 46 (1996) 598-608
26. Perfecto I., Mas A., Dietsch T., and Vandermeer J. Conservation of biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems: a tri-taxa comparison in southern Mexico. Biodivers. Conserv. 12 (2003) 1239-1252
27. Pineda E., Moreno C., Escobar F., and Halffter G. Frog, bat, and dung beetle diversity in the cloud forest and coffee agroecosystems of Veracruz, Mexico. Conserv. Biol. 19 (2005) 400-410
28. R Development Core Team, 2004. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org. Vienna, Austria.
29. Rao M.R., Singh M.P., and Day R. Insect pest problems in tropical agroforestry systems: contributory factors and strategies for management. Agroforest. Syst. 50 (2000) 243-277
30. Reis P.R., and Souza J.C. Pragas do cafeeiro. In: Rena A.B., Malavolta E., Rocha M., and Yamada T. (Eds). Cultura do Cafeeiro: Fatores que Afetam a Produtividade (1986), Piracicaba, Brasil 338-378
31. Roininen H., Price P.W., and Tahvanainen J. Bottom-up and top-down influences in the trophic system of a willow, a galling sawfly and inquilines. Oikos 77 (1996) 44-50
32. Root R.B. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and diverse habitats: the fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol. Monogr. 43 (1973) 95-124
33. Shahabuddin, Schulze C.H., and Tscharntke T. Changes of dung beetle communities from rainforests towards agroforestry systems and annual cultures in Sulawesi (Indonesia). Biodivers. Conserv. 14 (2005) 863-877
34. Soto-Pinto L., Perfecto I., and Caballero-Nieto J. Shade over coffee: its effects on berry borer, leaf rust and spontaneous herbs on Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest. Syst. 55 (2002) 37-45
35. StatSoft Inc., 1984-2004. Statistica for Windows (Software-system for data-analyses), Version 7.0. Tulsa, USA.
36. Tylianakis J.M., Klein A.M., and Tscharntke T. Spatiotemporal variation in the diversity of hymenoptera across a tropical habitat gradient. Ecology 12 (2005) 3296-3302
37. Yarnes C.T., and Boecklen W.J. Abiotic factors promote plant heterogeneity and influence herbivore performance and mortality in Gambel's oak (Quercus gambelii). Entomol. Exp. Appl. 114 (2005) 87-95