Differential reorganization of three syntax-related networks induced by a left frontal glioma

Brain

Volumn 137, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1193-1212

  Kinno, Ryuta ^a,b,c   Ohta, Shinri ^a,d   Muragaki, Yoshihiro ^c,e   Maruyama, Takashi ^c,e   Sakai, Kuniyoshi L ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b SHOWA UNIVERSITY NORTHERN YOKOHAMA HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

^d JAPAN SOCIETY FOR THE PROMOTION OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^e TOKYO WOMEN'S MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

agrammatism; frontal cortex; glioma; language; MRI

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGULAR GYRUS; ARTICLE; BRAIN REGION; CEREBELLUM NUCLEUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPREHENSION; DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GLIOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INFERIOR FRONTAL GYRUS; INTRAPARIETAL SULCUS; LINGUAL GYRUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPORAL LOBE; YOUNG ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; LANGUAGE; NERVE TRACT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; COMPREHENSION; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEURAL PATHWAYS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897897620     PISSN: 00068950     EISSN: 14602156     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu013     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Behin A, Hoang-Xuan K, Carpentier AF, Delattre J-Y. Primary brain tumours in adults. Lancet 2003; 361: 323-31.
2. Behrens TEJ, Johansen-Berg H, Woolrich MW, Smith SM, Wheeler-Kingshott CAM, Boulby PA, et al. Non-invasive mapping of connections between human thalamus and cortex using diffusion imaging. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 750-7.
3. Bornkessel I, Zysset S, Friederici AD, von Cramon DY, Schlesewsky M. Who did what to whom? The neural basis of argument hierarchies during language comprehension. Neuroimage 2005; 26: 221-33.
4. Caplan D, Baker C, Dehaut F. Syntactic determinants of sentence comprehension in aphasia. Cognition 1985; 21: 117-75.
5. Dapretto M, Bookheimer SY. Form and content: dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron 1999; 24: 427-32.
6. Desmurget M, Bonnetblanc F, Duffau H. Contrasting acute and slow-growing lesions: a new door to brain plasticity. Brain 2007; 130: 898-914.
7. Duffau H. Lessons from brain mapping in surgery for low-grade glioma: insights into associations between tumour and brain plasticity. Lancet Neurol 2005; 4: 476-86.
8. Embick D, Marantz A, Miyashita Y, O'Neil W, Sakai KL. A syntactic specialization for Broca's area. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97: 6150-4.
9. Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Ségonne F, Salat DH, et al. Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 2004; 14: 11-22.
10. Friederici AD. The brain basis of language processing: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 2011; 91: 1357-92.
11. Friederici AD, Rüschemeyer S-A, Hahne A, Fiebach CJ. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cereb Cortex 2003; 13: 170-7.
12. Friederici AD, von Cramon DY, Kotz SA. Role of the corpus callosum in speech comprehension: interfacing syntax and prosody. Neuron 2007; 53: 135-45.
13. Goodglass H, Menn L. Is agrammatism a unitary phenomenon? In: Kean M-L, editor. Agrammatism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1985. p. 1-26.
14. Granziera C, Schmahmann JD, Hadjikhani N, Meyer H, Meuli R, Wedeen V, et al. Diffusion spectrum imaging shows the structural basis of functional cerebellar circuits in the human cerebellum in vivo. PLoS One 2009; 4: e5101.
15. Griffiths JD, Marslen-Wilson WD, Stamatakis EA, Tyler LK. Functional organization of the neural language system: dorsal and ventral pathways are critical for syntax. Cereb Cortex 2013; 23: 139-47.
16. Grodzinsky Y. The neurology of syntax: language use without Broca's area. Behav Brain Sci 2000; 23: 1-71.
17. Habas C. Functional imaging of the deep cerebellar nuclei: a review. Cerebellum 2010; 9: 22-8.
18. Hashimoto R, Sakai KL. Specialization in the left prefrontal cortex for sentence comprehension. Neuron 2002; 35: 589-97.
19. Homae F, Hashimoto R, Nakajima K, Miyashita Y, Sakai KL. From perception to sentence comprehension: the convergence of auditory and visual information of language in the left inferior frontal cortex. Neuroimage 2002; 16: 883-900.
20. Horwitz B, Rumsey JM, Donohue BC. Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 8939-44.
21. Karnath H-O, Steinbach JP. Do brain tumours allow valid conclusions on the localisation of human brain functions?-Objections. Cortex 2011; 47: 1004-6.
22. Kato T, Shinoda J, Nakayama N, Miwa K, Okumura A, Yano H, et al. Metabolic assessment of gliomas using 11C-methionine, [ 18F] fluoro-deoxyglucose, and 11C-choline positron-emission tomography. Am J Neuroradiol 2008; 29: 1176-82.
23. Kinno R, Kawamura M, Shioda S, Sakai KL. Neural correlates of non-canonical syntactic processing revealed by a picture-sentence matching task. Hum Brain Mapp 2008; 29: 1015-27.
24. Kinno R, Muragaki Y, Hori T, Maruyama T, Kawamura M, Sakai KL. Agrammatic comprehension caused by a glioma in the left frontal cortex. Brain Lang 2009; 110: 71-80.
25. Krainik A, Lehéricy S, Duffau H, Capelle L, Chainay H, Cornu P, et al. Postoperative speech disorder after medial frontal surgery: role of the supplementary motor area. Neurology 2003; 60: 587-94.
26. Küper M, Timmann D. Cerebellar mutism. Brain Lang 2013; 127: 327-33.
27. Loui P, Li HC, Schlaug G. White matter integrity in right hemisphere predicts pitch-related grammar learning. Neuroimage 2011; 55: 500-7.
28. Mandonnet E, Delattre J-Y, Tanguy M-L, Swanson KR, Carpentier AF, Duffau H, et al. Continuous growth of mean tumor diameter in a subset of grade II gliomas. Ann Neurol 2003; 53: 524-8.
29. Mariën P, De Smet HJ, Wijgerde E, Verhoeven J, Crols R, De Deyn PP. Posterior fossa syndrome in adults: a new case and comprehensive survey of the literature. Cortex 2013; 49: 284-300.
30. Menn L, Obler LK. Theoretical motivations for the cross-language study of agrammatism. In: Menn L, Obler LK, editors. Agrammatic aphasia: a cross-language narrative sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1990. p. 3-12.
31. Meyer M, Friederici AD, von Cramon DY. Neurocognition of auditory sentence comprehension: event related fMRI reveals sensitivity to syntactic violations and task demands. Cogn Brain Res 2000; 9: 19-33.
32. Musso M, Moro A, Glauche V, Rijntjes M, Reichenbach J, Büchel C, et al. Broca's area and the language instinct. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 774-81.
33. Ojemann JG, Miller JW, Silbergeld DL. Preserved function in brain invaded by tumor. Neurosurgery 1996; 39: 253-9.
34. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971; 9: 97-113.
35. Price CJ, Friston KJ. Scanning patients with tasks they can perform. Hum Brain Mapp 1999; 8: 102-8.
36. Pulvermüller F. Agrammatism: behavioral description and neurobiological explanation. J Cogn Neurosci 1995; 7: 165-81.
37. Rolheiser T, Stamatakis EA, Tyler LK. Dynamic processing in the human language system: synergy between the arcuate fascicle and extreme capsule. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 16949-57.
38. Sakai KL. Language acquisition and brain development. Science 2005; 310: 815-9.
39. Sakai KL, Noguchi Y, Takeuchi T, Watanabe E. Selective priming of syntactic processing by event-related transcranial magnetic stimulation of Broca's area. Neuron 2002; 35: 1177-82.
40. Saur D, Kreher BW, Schnell S, Kümmerer D, Kellmeyer P, Vry M-S, et al. Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008; 105: 18035-40.
41. Saur D, Lange R, Baumgaertner A, Schraknepper V, Willmes K, Rijntjes M, et al. Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain 2006; 129: 1371-84.
42. Schwartz MF, Saffran EM, Marin OSM. The word order problem in agrammatism. I. Comprehension. Brain Lang 1980; 10: 249-62.
43. Seghier ML, Fagan E, Price CJ. Functional subdivisions in the left angular gyrus where the semantic system meets and diverges from the default network. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 16809-17.
44. Smith SM. The future of FMRI connectivity. Neuroimage 2012; 62: 1257-66.
45. Stromswold K, Caplan D, Alpert N, Rauch S. Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain Lang 1996; 52: 452-73.
46. Suzuki K, Sakai KL. An event-related fMRI study of explicit syntactic processing of normal/anomalous sentences in contrast to implicit syntactic processing. Cereb Cortex 2003; 13: 517-26.
47. Thiel A, Schumacher B, Wienhard K, Gairing S, Kracht LW, Wagner R, et al. Direct demonstration of transcallosal disinhibition in language networks. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006; 26: 1122-7.
48. Ulmer JL, Hacein-Bey L, Mathews VP, Mueller WM, DeYoe EA, Prost RW, et al. Lesion-induced pseudo-dominance at functional magnetic resonance imaging: implications for preoperative assessments. Neurosurgery 2004; 55: 569-81.
49. Wilson SM, Dronkers NF, Ogar JM, Jang J, Growdon ME, Agosta F, et al. Neural correlates of syntactic processing in the nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 16845-54.
50. Wilson SM, Galantucci S, Tartaglia MC, Rising K, Patterson DK, Henry ML, et al. Syntactic processing depends on dorsal language tracts. Neuron 2011; 72: 397-403.
51. Wong FCK, Chandrasekaran B, Garibaldi K, Wong P.C.M. White matter anisotropy in the ventral language pathway predicts sound-to-word learning success. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 8780-5.