An amino acid substitution-selection model adjusts residue fitness to improve phylogenetic estimation

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 779-792

  Wang, Huai Chun ^a,b   Susko, Edward ^a,b   Roger, Andrew J ^b,c  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Amino acid substitution; Maximum likelihood; Mixture model; Molecular phylogenetics; Selection; Site specific frequencies

Indexed keywords

CYTOCHROME B; NUCLEAR PROTEIN;

AMINO ACID ANALYSIS; AMINO ACID COMPOSITION; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CHLOROPLAST GENOME; CODON; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; LONG BRANCH ATTRACTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; PHYLOGENETIC TREE; PHYLOGENOMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; PROBABILITY; RESIDUE ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; MIXTURE MODEL; MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS; SELECTION; SITE-SPECIFIC FREQUENCIES;

ALGORITHMS; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; ANGIOSPERMS; CHLOROPLASTS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; GENES, PLANT; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PLANT PROTEINS;

EID: 84897856309     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu044     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Adachi J, Hasegawa M. 1996. Model of amino acid substitution in proteins encoded by mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 42:459-468.
2. Adachi J, Waddell PJ, Martin W, Hasegawa M. 2000. Plastid genome phylogeny and a model of amino acid substitution for proteins encoded by chloroplast DNA. J Mol Evol. 50:348-358.
3. Akaike H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Automatic Control. 19:716-723.
4. Averof M, Rokas A, Wolfe KH, Sharp PM. 2000. Evidence for a high frequency of simultaneous double-nucleotide substitutions. Science 287:1283-1286.
5. Brinkmann H, van der Giezen M, Zhou Y, Poncelin de Raucourt G, Philippe H. 2005. An empirical assessment of long-branch attraction artefacts in deep eukaryotic phylogenomics. Syst Biol. 54:743-757.
6. Brown MW, Sharpe S, Silberman JD, Heiss A, Lang BF, Simpson AGB, Roger AJ. 2013. Phylogenomics demonstrates that breviate flagellates are related to opisthokonts: implications for the origin of genes involved in multicellularity. Proc Biol Sci. 280:1755-1764.
7. Cao Y, Adachi J, Janke A, Pääbo S, Hasegawa M. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of a tree based on a single gene. J Mol Evol. 39:519-527.
8. Dayhoff MO, Schwartz R, Orcutt BC. 1978. A model for evolutionary change in proteins. Atlas of protein sequence and structure (Vol. 5 suppl. 3). Washington (DC): National Biomedical Research Foundation. Chapter 22, p. 345-352.
9. Dimmic MW, Mindell DP, Goldstein RA. 2000. Modeling evolution at the protein level using an adjustable amino acid fitness model. Pac Symp Biocomput. 5:18-29.
10. Doron-Faigenboim A, Pupko T. 2007. A combined empirical and mechanistic codon model. Mol Biol Evol. 24:388-397.
11. Felsenstein J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 17:368-376.
12. Felsenstein J. 2005. PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package) version 3.6. Distributed by the author. Seattle (WA): Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington.
13. Foster PG, Jermiin LS, Hickey DA. 1997. Nucleotide composition bias affects amino acid content in proteins coded by animal mitochondria. J Mol Evol. 44:282-288.
14. Goldman N, Whelan S. 2002. A novel use of equilibrium frequencies in models of sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 19:1821-1831.
15. Goremykin VV, Nikiforova SV, Biggs PJ, Zhong B, Delange P, Martin W, Woetzel S, Atherton RA, McLenachan PA, Lockhart PJ. 2013. The evolutionary root of flowering plants. Syst Biol. 62:50-61.
16. Halpern AL, Bruno WJ. 1998. Evolutionary distances for protein-coding sequences: modeling site-specific residue frequencies. Mol Biol Evol. 15:910-917.
17. Henikoff S, Henikoff JG. 1991. Automated assembly of protein blocks for database searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 19:6565-657.
18. Holder MT, Zwickl DJ, Desimoz C. 2008. Evaluating the robustness of phylogenetic methods to among-site variability in substitution processes. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363:4012-4013.
19. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM. 1992. The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Comput Appl Biosci. 8: 275-282.
20. Kimura M. 1962. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics 4:713-719.
21. Kishino H, Hasegawa M. 1989. Evaluation of the maximum likelihood estimate of the evolutionary tree topologies from DNA sequence data, and the branching order in Hominoidea. J Mol Evol. 29: 170-179.
22. Kosiol C, Holmes I, Goldman N. 2007. An empirical codon model for protein sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 24:1464-1479.
23. Kuhner MK, Felsenstein J. 1994. A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol Biol Evol. 11:459-468.
24. Lartillot N, Lepage T, Blanquart S. 2009. PhyloBayes 3: a Bayesian software package for phylogenetic reconstruction and molecular dating. Bioinformatics 25:2286-2288.
25. Lartillot N, Philippe H. 2004. A Bayesian mixture model for across-site heterogeneities in the amino-acid replacement process. Mol Biol Evol. 21:1095-1109.
26. Le SQ, Gascuel O. 2008. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol. 25:1307-1320.
27. Le SQ, Lartillot N, Gascuel O. 2008. Phylogenetic mixture models for proteins. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 363:3965-3976.
28. Leebens-Mack J, Raubeson LA, Cui L, Kuehl JV, Fourcade MH, Chumley TW, Boore JL, Jansen RK, depamphilis CW. 2005. Identifying the basal angiosperm node in chloroplast genome phylogenies: sampling one's way out of the Felsenstein zone. Mol Biol Evol. 22: 1948-1963.
29. Quang LS, Gascuel O, Lartillot N. 2008. Empirical profile mixture models for phylogenetic reconstruction. Bioinformatics 24:2317-2323.
30. Robinson DR, Foulds LR. 1981. Comparison of phylogenetic trees. Math Biosci. 53:131-147.
31. Rodrigue N. 2013. On the statistical interpretation of site-specific variables in phylogeny-based substitution models. Genetics 193:557-564.
32. Rodrigue N, Philippe H, Lartillot N. 2010. Mutation-selection models of coding sequence evolution with site-heterogeneous amino acid fitness profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 107:4629-4634.
33. Sander C, Schneider R. 1991. Database of homology-derived protein structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins 9:56-68.
34. Self S, Liang K. 1987. Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under non-standard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc. 82:605-610.
35. Sjölander K, Karplus K, Brown M, Hughey R, Krogh A, Mian IS, Haussler D. 1996. Dirichlet mixtures: a method for improved detection of weak but significant protein sequence homology. Comput Appl Biosci. 12:327-345.
36. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Syst Biol. 57:758-771.
37. Susko E, Roger AJ. 2007. On reduced amino acid alphabets for phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol. 24:2139-2150.
38. Tamuri AU, dos Reis M, Goldstein RA. 2012. Estimating the distribution of selection coefficients from phylogenetic data using sitewise mutation-selection models. Genetics 190:1101-1115.
39. Wang HC, Li K, Susko E, Roger AJ. 2008. A class frequencymixture model that adjusts for site specific amino acid frequencies and improves inference of protein phylogeny. BMC Evol Biol. 8:331.
40. Wang HC, Singer GAC, Hickey DA. 2004. Mutational bias affects protein evolution in flowering plants. Mol Biol Evol. 21:90-96.
41. Wang HC, Spencer M, Susko E, Roger AJ. 2007. Testing for covarion-like evolution in protein sequences. Mol Biol Evol. 24:294-305.
42. Wang HC, Susko E, Roger AJ. 2013. The site-wise log-likelihood score is a good predictor of genes under positive selection. J Mol Evol. 76: 280-294.
43. Whelan S, Goldman N. 2001. A general empirical model of protein evolution derived from multiple protein families using a maximum- likelihood approach. Mol Biol Evol. 18:691-699.
44. Whelan S, Goldman N. 2004. Estimating the frequency of events that cause multiple-nucleotide changes. Genetics 167:2027-2043.
45. Yang Z. 1994. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 39:306-314.
46. Yang Z, Nielsen R. 2008. Mutation-selection models of codon substitution and their use to estimate selective strengths on codon usage. Mol Biol Evol. 25:568-579.
47. Yang Z, Nielsen R, Goldman N, Pedersen AM. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics 155:431-449.