The role of internet self-efficacy in the acceptance of web-based electronic medical records

Contemporary Issues in End User Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 54-76

  Ma, Qingxiong ^a   Liu, Liping ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL MISSOURI   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897820567     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-926-7.ch003     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Social cognitive determinants of blood donation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1431-1457.
2. Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. (2000). The evolving relationship between general and specific computer literacy. An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
4. Bandura, A. (2001). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. Measurement and evaluation in counseling and development. Retrieved from http://www.emory.edu/EDUCATION/mfp/banseg.html
5. Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (1999). Empirical research in information systems: The practice of relevance. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 3-16.
6. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370.
7. Chau, P. K. (1996). An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(2), 185-205.
8. Chau, P. K. (2000). Influence of computer attitude and self-efficacy on IT usage behavior. Journal of End User Computing, 13(1), 26-33.
9. Chau, P. Y. K., & Hu, P. J. (2002), Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: An empirical test of competing theories. Information & Management, 39(4), 297-311.
10. Chircu, A. M., Davis, G. B., & Kauffman, R. J. (2000). The role of trust and expertise in the adoption of electronic commerce intermediaries (Tech. Rep. No. WP 00-07). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Carlson School of Management.
11. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
12. Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-339.
13. Dinev, T., & Koufteros, X. (2002). Self-efficacy and Internet usage - Measurement and factorial validity. In Proceedings of DSI, San Diego, CA.
14. Ding, L., Velicer, W. F., & Harlow, L. L. (1995). Effects of estimation methods, number of indicators per factor, and improper solutions on structural equation modeling fit indices. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 119-143.
15. Eastin, M. S., & LaRose, R. (2000). Internet self-efficacy and the psychology of the Digital Divide. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(1). Retrieved from http://www.asusc.org/jcmc/vol6/issuel/eastin.html
16. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Gefen, D., & Keil, M. (1998). The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: An extension of the technology acceptance model. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 29(2), 35-49.
18. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (1997). Gender differences in the perception and use of e-mail: An extension to the technology acceptance model. MIS Quarterly, 21(4), 389-401.
19. Gefen, D., & Straub, D. (2000). The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, (digital version) 1(8).
20. Gravill, J. I., Compeau, D. R., & Marcolin, B. L. (2002). Metacognition and IT: The influence of self-efficacy and self-awareness. In Proceedings of the Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems (pp. 1055-1064).
21. Hair, Jr., J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: PrenticeHall.
22. Hendrickson, A. R., Massey, P. D., & Cronan, T. P. (1993). On the test-retest reliability of perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use scales. MIS Quarterly, 17(2), 227-230.
23. Hu, L., Bentler, P. M., & Kano, Y. (1992) Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 325-344.
24. Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish Case Study. Information and Management, 29(5), 227-38.
25. th Hawaii International Conference on System Science. IEEE.
26. Joo, Y., Bong, M., & Choi, H. (2000). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning, academic self-efficacy, and Internet self-efficacy in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48(2), 5-17.
27. Keil, M., Beranek, P. M, & Konsynski, B. R. (1995). Usefulness and ease of use: Field study evidence regarding task considerations. Decision Support Systems, 13(1), 75-91.
28. Ketler, K., Willems, J. R., & Srinivasan, M. (2002). The need for training in information technology: A survey of healthcare. In Proceedings of the Decision Sciences Institute 2002 Annual Meeting. San Diego, CA.
29. Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J. Sena, M. P., & Zhuang, Y. (2000). The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29(3), 269-292.
30. Levine, T., & Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer use, confidence, attitudes, and knowledge: A causal analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(1), 125-146.
31. Lim, K.S. (2001). An empirical test of the technology acceptance model.In Proceedings of the Decision Science Institute Annual Meeting. San Francisco.
32. Liu, L., Li, C. C., & Karau, S. J. (2003). A measurement model of trust in Internet stores. Akron, OH: University of Akron.
33. Liu, L., & Ma, Q. (2004). Emerging e-business technologies for electronic medical records. International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management, 6(1/2), 1-22.
34. Lopez, D., & Manson, D., (1997). A study of individual computer self-efficacy and perceived usefulness of the empowered desktop information system. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10, 83-92.
35. Ma, Q., & Liu, L. (2004). The technology acceptance model: A meta-analysis of empirical findings. Journal of End User Computing, 16(1), 59-72.
36. Marakas, G. M., Yi, M. Y., & Johnson, R. D. (1998). The multilevel and multifaceted character of computer self-efficacy: Toward clarification of the construct and an integrative framework for research. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 126-163.
37. Mathieson, K. (1991). Predicting user intentions: Comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behavior. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 173-191.
38. Metcalfe, J. (1998). Cognitive optimism: Self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics?. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 100-110.
39. Munro, M. C., Huff, S. L., Marcolin, B. L., & Compeau, D. R. (1997). Understanding and measuring user competence. Information & Management, 33(1), 45-57.
40. th ASIS Annual Meeting, Baltimore (Vol. 33, pp. 100-109).
41. Nahl, D., & Meer, P. (1997). User-centered assessment of two Web browsers: Errors, perceived self-efficacy, and success. In Proceedings of the 60th ASIS Annual Meeting, Washington, DC (Vol. 34, pp. 89-97).
42. Peterson, R. R., & Fairchild, A. M. (2003). Adoption trends in application service provisioning: An exploratory field study of small and medium-size enterprises. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS). Naples, Italy.
43. Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2000). Applying TAM to a parallel systems conversion strategy. Journal of Information Technology Theory & Application, 2(2).
44. Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwal, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
45. Straub, D. W. (1994). The effect of culture on IT diffusion: E-mail and FAX in Japan and the U.S. Information Systems Research, 5(1), 23-47.
46. Susarla, A., Barua, A., & Whinston, A. B. (2003). Understanding the service component of application service provision: An empirical analysis of satisfaction with ASP services. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 91-123.
47. Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570.
48. Torkzadeh, G., & Van Dyke, T. P. (2002). Effects of training on Internet selfefficacy and computer user attitudes. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 479-494.
49. Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342-365.
50. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.
51. Voelker, K. G. (2003). Primer on electronic medical records. Retrieved January 3, 2003, from http://www.elmr-electronic-medical-records-emr.com/electronic_medical_record_Primer.htm
52. Waegemann, P. C. (2002). Status report 2002: Electronic health records, status report Medical Records Institute.