User-centered assessment of two web browsers: Errors, perceived self-efficacy, and success

Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting

Volumn 34, Issue , 1997, Pages 89-97

  Nahl, Diane ^a   Meer, Muhammad Pervaiz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0008794556     PISSN: 00447870     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Allwood, C. M. & Eliasson, M. (1987). Analogy and other sources of difficulty in novice's very first text-editing. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 27, 1-22.
2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
3. Carberry, S. & Chu-Carroll, J. (1996). "User models in adaptive systems." In A. Kent & J. G. Williams (Eds.), Encyclopedia of microcomputers (Vol. 19) (pp. 275-292). New York: Marcel Dekker.
4. Chu, H. & Rosenthal, M. (1996). Search engines for the world wide web: A comparative study and evaluation methodology. In In Stephen Hardin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 59th American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting (pp. 127-135) Medford, NJ: Information Today.
5. Craigmile, B. (1995). What a tangled web it is...three browsers reviewed. Library Software.Review, 14, 5-8.
6. Dickson, J. (1984). An analysis of user errors in searching an online catalog. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 4, 19-38.
7. Ding, W. & Marchionini, G. (1996). A comparative study of web search service performance. In Stephen Hardin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 59th American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting.(pp. 136-142) Medford, NJ: Information Today.
8. Heffron, J. K., Dillon, A. & Mostafa, J. A., (1996). Landmarks in the world-wide-web: A preliminary study. In Stephen Hardin (Ed.), Proceedings of the 59th American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting, (pp. 143-145) Medford, NJ: Information Today.
9. Janosky, B., Philip, J. S. & Charles, H. (1986). Online library catalog systems: An analysis of user errors. Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 25, 573-592.
10. Nahl, D. (1995). Affective elaborations in Boolean search instructions for novices: Effects on comprehension, self-confidence, and error type. In Tom Kinney (Ed.), Proceedings of the 58th American Society for Information Science Annual Meeting, (pp. 3-8) Medford, NJ: Information Today.
11. Nahl, D. & Harada, V. H. (1996). Composing boolean search statements: Self-confidence, concept analysis, search logic, and errors. School Library Media Quarterly, 24, 199-207.
12. Notess, G. R. (1995). Comparing web browsers: Mosaic, Cello, Netscape, WinWeb. Online, 19, 36-38.
13. Puttapithakporn, S. (1990). Interface design and user problems and errors: A case study of novice searchers. Reference Quarterly, 30, 195-203.
14. Reichard, K. (1996). Browser wars. Accounting Technology, 21, 12, 14.
15. Rizzo, A., Parlangeli, O., Marchigiani, E. & Bagnara, S. (1996). The management of human errors in user-centered design. SIGCHI Bulletin, 28, 114-118.
16. Wright, P. (1983). Manual dexterity: A user-oriented approach to computer documentation. In J. C. Thomas and M. L. Schneider (Eds.), Proceedings, Human Factors in Computer Systems, (pp. 11-18) Norwood, N.J.: Ablex.