Space, time, and causality in the human brain

NeuroImage

Volumn 92, Issue , 2014, Pages 285-297

  Woods, Adam J ^a,b   Hamilton, Roy H ^b   Kranjec, Alexander ^c   Minhaus, Preet ^d   Bikson, Marom ^d   Yu, Jonathan ^b   Chatterjee, Anjan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c DUQUESNE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d City University of New York   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; FMRI; Perceptual causality; Space; TDCS; Time

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FRONTAL CORTEX; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION; ADOLESCENT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NERVE NET; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION; TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897801119     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: 10959572     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.02.015     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Assmus A., Marshall J.C., Ritzl A., Noth J., Zilles K., Fink G.R. Left inferior parietal cortex integrates time and space during collision judgments. Neuroimage 2003, 20:S82-S88.
2. Blakemore S.J., Fonlupt P., Pachot-Clouard M., Darmon C., Boyer P., Meltzoff A.N., et al. How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport 2001, 12:3741-3746.
3. Blakemore S.J., Boyer P., Pachot-Clouard M., Meltzoff A., Segebarth C., Decety J. The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 13:837-844.
4. Blos J., Chatterjee A., Kircher T., Straube B. Neural correlates of causality judgment in physical and social context: the reversed effects of space and time. Neuroimage 2012, 63:882-893.
5. Bolognini N., Fregni F., Casati C., Olgiati E., Vallar G. Brain polarization of parietal cortex augments training-induced improvement of visual exploratory and attentional skills. Brain Res. 2010, 1349:76-89.
6. Buehner M.J., Humphreys G. Causal contraction: spatial binding in the perception of collision events. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:44-48.
7. Buehner M.J., May J. Knowledge mediates the timeframe of covariation assessment in human causal induction. Think. Reasoning 2002, 8:269-295.
8. Buehner M.J., May J. Rethinking temporal contiguity and the judgment of causality: effects of prior knowledge, experience, and reinforcement procedure. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 2003, 56A:865-890.
9. Bueti D., Walsh V., Frith C., Rees G. Different brain circuits underlie motor and perceptual representations of temporal intervals. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2008, 20:204-214.
10. Chang L.J., Yarkoni T., Khaw M.W., Sanfey A.G. Decoding the role of the insula in human cognition: functional parcellation and large-scale reverse inference. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23:739-749.
11. Chatterjee A. A madness to the methods in cognitive neuroscience?. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:847-849.
12. Colebatch J.G., Deiber M.P., Passingham R.E., Friston K., Frackowiak R.S.J. Regional cerebral blood flow during voluntary arm and hand movements in human subjects. J. Neurophysiol. 1991, 65:1392-1401.
13. Datta A., Bansal V., Diaz J., Patel J., Reato D., Bikson M. Gyri-precise head model of transcranial DC stimulation: improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad. Brain Stimul. 2009, 2:201-207.
14. Debaere F., Wenderoth N., Sunaert S., Van Hecke P., Swinnen S.P. Internal vs external generation of movements: differential neural pathways involved in bimanual coordination performed in the presence or absence of augmented visual feedback. Neuroimage 2003, 19:764-776.
15. Dettore D. Obsessive-compulsive disorder and thinking illusions. Psicoter. Cognit. Comportam. 2011, 17:381-394.
16. Dodds C.M., Morein-Zamir S., Robbins T.W. Dissociating inhibition, attention, and response control in the frontoparietal network using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb. Cortex 2011, 21:1155-1165.
17. Dosenbach N.U., Visscher K.M., Palmer E.D., Miezin F.M., Wenger K.K., Kang H.C., et al. A core system for the implementation of task sets. Neuron 2006, 50:799-812.
18. Duncan J., Owen A.M. Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands. Trends Neurosci. 2000, 23:475-483.
19. Eickhoff S.B., Paus T., Caspers S., Grosbras M.H., Evance A.C., Zilles K., et al. Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited. Neuroimage 2007, 36:511-521.
20. Feceteau S., Pascual-Leone A., Zald D.H., Liguori P., Theoret H., Boggio P.S., et al. Activation of prefrontal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation reduces appetite for risk during ambiguous decision making. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:6212-6218.
21. Fonlupt P. Perception and judgment of physical causality involve different brain structures. Cogn. Brain Res. 2003, 17:248-254.
22. Friston K.J. Statistical parametric mapping: ontology and current issues. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 1995, 15:361-370.
23. Fugelsang J.A., Roser M.E., Corballis P.M., Gazzaniga M.S., Dunbar K.N. Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. Cogn. Brain Res. 2005, 24:41-47.
24. Gooch C.M., Wiener M., Hamilton A.C., Coslett H.B. Temporal discrimination of sub- and suprasecond time intervals: a voxel-based lesion mapping analysis. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5:59.
25. Gruber H.E., Fink C.D., Damm V. Effects of experience on the perception of causality. J. Exp. Psychol. 1957, 53:89-93.
26. Guski R., Troje N.F. Audiovisual phenomenal causality. Percept. Psychophys. 2003, 65:789-800.
27. Hecht D., Walsh V., Lavidor M. Transcranial direct current stimulation facilitates decision making in a probabilistic guessing task. J. Neurosci. 2010, 30:4241-4245.
28. Heekeren H.R., Marrett S., Ungerleider L.G. The neural systems that mediate human perceptual decision making. Nat. Neurosci. 2008, 9:467-479.
29. Keeser D., Padberg F., Reisinger E., Pogarell O., Kirsch V., Palm U., et al. Prefrontal direct current stimulation modulates resting EEG and event-related potentials in healthy subjects: a standardized low resolution tomography (sLORETA) study. Neuroimage 2011, 55:644-657.
30. Kuo H.I., Bikson M., Datta A., Minhas P., Paulus W., Kuo M.F., et al. Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4×1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study. Brain Stimul. 2013, 6:644-648.
31. Laufs H., Krakow K., Sterzer P., Eger E., Beyerle A., Salek-Haddadi A., et al. Electroencephalographic signatures of attentional and cognitive default modes in spontaneous brain activity fluctuations at rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:11053-11058.
32. Lee K.-H., Egelston P.N., Brown W.H., Gregory A.N., Braker A.T., Woodruff P.W.R. The role of the cerebellum in subsecond time perception: evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2007, 19:147-157.
33. Leslie A.M. The perception of causality in infants. Perception 1982, 11:173-186.
34. Leslie A.M. Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception 1984, 13:287-305.
35. Leslie A.M., Keeble S. Do six-month-old infants perceive causality?. Cognition 1987, 25:265-288.
36. Menon V., Uddin L.Q. Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Struct. Funct. 2010, 214:655-667.
37. Michotte A.E. The Perception of Causality. Translated by T. R. Miles and E. Miles in 1963 1946/1963, Methuen, London.
38. Moss H.E., Abdallah S., Fletcher P., Bright P., Pilgrim L., Acres K., et al. Selecting among competing alternatives: selection and retrieval in the left inferior frontal gyrus. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 15:1723-1735.
39. Nelson J.T., McKinley R.A., Golob E.J., Warm J.S., Parasuraman R. Enhancing vigilance in operators with prefrontal cortex transcranial direct current stimulation. tDCS. Neuroimage 2014, 85:909-917.
40. Nichols T., Brett M., Andersson J., Wager T., Poline J.B. Valid conjunction inference with the minimum statistic. Neuroimage 2005, 25:653-660.
41. Oakes L.M., Cohen L.B. Infant perception of a causal event. Cogn. Dev. 1990, 5:193-207.
42. Picard N., Strick P.L. Activation of the supplementary motor area (SMA) during performance of visually guided movements. Cereb. Cortex 2003, 13:977-986.
43. Powesland P.F. The effect of practice upon the perception of causality. Can. J. Psychol. 1959, 13:155-168.
44. Raichle M.E., MacLeod A.M., Snyder A.Z., Powers W.J., Gusnard D.A., Shulman G.L. A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:676-682.
45. Ray E.D., Schlottmann A. The perception of social and mechanical causality in young children with ASD. Res. Autism Spectr. Dis. 2007, 1:266-280.
46. Roser M.E., Fugelsang J.A., Dunbar K.N., Corballis P.M., Gazzaniga M.S. Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. Neuropsychology 2005, 19:591-602.
47. Salman M.S. The cerebellum: it's about time! But timing is not everything-new insights into the role of the cerebellum in timing motor and cognitive tasks. J. Child Neurol. 2002, 17:1-9.
48. Schlottmann A. Seeing it happen and knowing how it works: how children understand the relation between perceptual causality and underlying mechanisms. Dev. Psychol. 1999, 3:303-317.
49. Scholl B.J., Tremoulet P. Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:299-309.
50. Shanks D.R. Forward and backward blocking in human contingency judgment. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. B 1985, 37:1-21.
51. Singh-Curry V., Husain M. The functional role of the inferior parietal lobe in the dorsal and ventral stream dichotomy. Neuropsychologia 2009, 47:1434-1448.
52. Straube B., Chatterjee A. Space and time in perceptual causality. Front. Human Neurosci. 2010, 4:1-10.
53. Straube B., Wolk D., Chatterjee A. The role of the right parietal lobe in the perception of causality: a tDCS study. Exp. Brain Res. 2011, 215:315-325.
54. Thielscher A., Pessoa L. Neural correlates of perceptual choice and decision making during fear-disgust discrimination. J. Neurosci. 2007, 27:2908-2917.
55. Tschacher W., Kupper Z. Perception of causality in schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Schizophr. Bull. 2006, 32:106-112.
56. van den Heuvel M., Mandl R., Luigjes J., Hulshoff Pol H. Microstructural organization of the cingulum tract and the level of default mode functional connectivity. J. Neurosci. 2008, 28:10844-10851.
57. Wencil E.B., Aguirre G.K., Coslett H.B., Chatterjee A. Carving the clock at its component joints: neural basis for interval timing. J. Neurophysiol. 2010, 104:160-168.
58. Wende K.C., Nagels A., Blos J., Stratmann M., Chatterjee A., Kircher T., et al. Differences and commonalities in the judgment of causality in physical and social contexts: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2013, 51:2572-2580.
59. Wendelken C., Ditterich J., Bunge S.A., Carter C.S. Stimulus and response conflict processing during perceptual decision-making. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2009, 9:437-447.
60. Wolff P. Representing causation. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2007, 136:82-111.
61. Wolff P. Dynamics and the perception of causal events. Understanding Events 2008, 555-585. Oxford University Press, New York. T.F. Shipley, J.M. Zacks (Eds.).
62. Wolpert L. Casual belief and the origins of technology. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 2003, 361:1709-1719.
63. Wolpert L. Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast 2006, Faber & Faber, London.
64. Wolpert L. Cognition: evolution does help to explain how minds work. Nature 2009, 459:506.
65. Woods A.J., Lehet M., Chatterjee A. Context modulates the contribution of time and space in causal inference. Front. Psychol. 2012, 3:371.
66. Yarkoni T., Poldrack R.A., Nichols T.E., Van Essen D.C., Wager T.D. Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data. Nat. Methods 2011, 8:665-670.
67. Yin B., Troger A.B. Exploring the 4th dimension: hippocampus, time, and memory revisited. Front. Integr. Neurosci. 2011, 5:36.
68. Yoon K.J., Oh B.M., Kim D.Y. Functional improvement and neuroplastic effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) delivered 1day vs. 1week after cerebral ischemia in rats. Brain Res. 2012, 1452:61-72.
69. Yousry T.A., Schmid U.D., Alkadhi H., Schmidt D., Peraud A., Buettner A., Winkler P. Localization of the motor hand area to a knob on the precentral gyrus. A new landmark. Brain 1997, 120:141-157.
70. Zhang J.X., Feng C.M., Fox P.T., Gao J.H., Tab L.H. Is left inferior frontal gyrus a general mechanism for selection?. Neuroimage 2004, 23:596-603.
71. Zhang J., Hughes L.E., Rowe J.B. Selection and inhibition mechanisms for human voluntary action decisions. Neuroimage 2012, 63:392-402.